卡塔尔伊斯兰银行和传统银行的财务绩效:比较分析

Naseem Shah Shirazi
{"title":"卡塔尔伊斯兰银行和传统银行的财务绩效:比较分析","authors":"Naseem Shah Shirazi","doi":"10.58932/muld0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of bank performance evaluation is to guarantee that they efficiently ‎utilize resources. Financial performance analysis is a critical tool for recognizing ‎the bank's weaknesses and strengths across its numerous activities. The CAMELS ‎technique is regarded as a supervisory tool to evaluate bank performance based on ‎several aspects, according to the literature review. Regulators use on-site and off-‎site monitoring tools to assess a bank's financial stability. The CAMELS rating ‎system encourages transparency, evolution, and change in all financial ‎institutions. Furthermore, this method identifies the structural strengths and ‎weaknesses of financial organizations. This study conducts a comparative analysis ‎of Islamic and conventional banks in Qatar using the CAMELS rating scale from ‎‎2015 to 2020. We used a sample of 14 banks in Qatar, four of which were Islamic ‎while the others were conventional. The findings indicate that Islamic banks ‎showcase superior performance in Qatar while outperforming their conventional ‎counterparts in many variables. However, none of the banks in Qatar could obtain ‎a rating of 1, indicating areas of weaknesses that need to be worked on, particularly ‎in the area of liquidity, which was a critical factor for all banks. According to this ‎study, the Qatar Central Bank should improve the monitoring and screening of all ‎Islamic banks in Qatar. Furthermore, it is suggested that the Qatar central bank ‎employs the CAMELS system to track operations and field offices for banks ‎functioning to facilitate regular access to a stable banking sector. Banks can use ‎CAMELS to track their performance, and the necessary actions must be ‎undertaken.‎","PeriodicalId":336327,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Islamic Economics and Governance","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial Performance of Islamic and Conventional Banks in Qatar: A ‎Comparative Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Naseem Shah Shirazi\",\"doi\":\"10.58932/muld0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The goal of bank performance evaluation is to guarantee that they efficiently ‎utilize resources. Financial performance analysis is a critical tool for recognizing ‎the bank's weaknesses and strengths across its numerous activities. The CAMELS ‎technique is regarded as a supervisory tool to evaluate bank performance based on ‎several aspects, according to the literature review. Regulators use on-site and off-‎site monitoring tools to assess a bank's financial stability. The CAMELS rating ‎system encourages transparency, evolution, and change in all financial ‎institutions. Furthermore, this method identifies the structural strengths and ‎weaknesses of financial organizations. This study conducts a comparative analysis ‎of Islamic and conventional banks in Qatar using the CAMELS rating scale from ‎‎2015 to 2020. We used a sample of 14 banks in Qatar, four of which were Islamic ‎while the others were conventional. The findings indicate that Islamic banks ‎showcase superior performance in Qatar while outperforming their conventional ‎counterparts in many variables. However, none of the banks in Qatar could obtain ‎a rating of 1, indicating areas of weaknesses that need to be worked on, particularly ‎in the area of liquidity, which was a critical factor for all banks. According to this ‎study, the Qatar Central Bank should improve the monitoring and screening of all ‎Islamic banks in Qatar. Furthermore, it is suggested that the Qatar central bank ‎employs the CAMELS system to track operations and field offices for banks ‎functioning to facilitate regular access to a stable banking sector. Banks can use ‎CAMELS to track their performance, and the necessary actions must be ‎undertaken.‎\",\"PeriodicalId\":336327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Islamic Economics and Governance\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Islamic Economics and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58932/muld0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Islamic Economics and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58932/muld0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

银行绩效评估的目的是保证银行有效地利用资源。财务绩效分析是识别银行在众多活动中的弱点和优势的关键工具。根据文献综述,骆驼技术被视为一种基于几个方面评估银行绩效的监督工具。监管机构使用现场和场外监测工具来评估银行的财务稳定性。骆驼评级体系鼓励所有金融机构透明化、演进和变革。此外,该方法确定了金融组织的结构优势和劣势。本研究使用2015年至2020年的camel评级量表对卡塔尔的伊斯兰银行和传统银行进行了比较分析。我们选取了卡塔尔的14家银行作为样本,其中4家是伊斯兰银行,其他的是传统银行。研究结果表明,伊斯兰银行在卡塔尔表现优异,同时在许多变量上优于传统银行。然而,卡塔尔没有一家银行能够获得1级的评级,这表明存在需要改进的薄弱环节,特别是在流动性方面,这对所有银行来说都是一个关键因素。根据这项研究,卡塔尔中央银行应该改善对卡塔尔所有伊斯兰银行的监控和筛选。此外,有人建议卡塔尔中央银行采用camel系统来跟踪银行的业务和外地办事处,以促进定期进入稳定的银行业。银行可以使用camel来跟踪它们的业绩,并且必须采取必要的行动
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Financial Performance of Islamic and Conventional Banks in Qatar: A ‎Comparative Analysis
The goal of bank performance evaluation is to guarantee that they efficiently ‎utilize resources. Financial performance analysis is a critical tool for recognizing ‎the bank's weaknesses and strengths across its numerous activities. The CAMELS ‎technique is regarded as a supervisory tool to evaluate bank performance based on ‎several aspects, according to the literature review. Regulators use on-site and off-‎site monitoring tools to assess a bank's financial stability. The CAMELS rating ‎system encourages transparency, evolution, and change in all financial ‎institutions. Furthermore, this method identifies the structural strengths and ‎weaknesses of financial organizations. This study conducts a comparative analysis ‎of Islamic and conventional banks in Qatar using the CAMELS rating scale from ‎‎2015 to 2020. We used a sample of 14 banks in Qatar, four of which were Islamic ‎while the others were conventional. The findings indicate that Islamic banks ‎showcase superior performance in Qatar while outperforming their conventional ‎counterparts in many variables. However, none of the banks in Qatar could obtain ‎a rating of 1, indicating areas of weaknesses that need to be worked on, particularly ‎in the area of liquidity, which was a critical factor for all banks. According to this ‎study, the Qatar Central Bank should improve the monitoring and screening of all ‎Islamic banks in Qatar. Furthermore, it is suggested that the Qatar central bank ‎employs the CAMELS system to track operations and field offices for banks ‎functioning to facilitate regular access to a stable banking sector. Banks can use ‎CAMELS to track their performance, and the necessary actions must be ‎undertaken.‎
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Factors Affecting Liquidity Risk in Islamic Banking in Pakistan Financial Performance of Islamic and Conventional Banks in Qatar: A ‎Comparative Analysis Islamic Capital Market Research: A Bibliometric Visualization based on Scopus ‎Database (2000-2022) Islamic Banking: Role of Customer’s Perception and Awareness to make it ‎competitive with Conventional Banking The Role of Financial Inclusion in Income Inequality, Poverty Reduction & ‎Economic Growth in Developing Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1