羁押视角下的个人自由与比例原则

Domnița Vizdoagă
{"title":"羁押视角下的个人自由与比例原则","authors":"Domnița Vizdoagă","doi":"10.52277/1857-2405.2022.2(61).01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although some limitations of the right to liberty are allowed, these measures must be applied in strict accordance with the law, guaranteeing the protection of any person against arbitrary or abusive detention, as the effects of such violations can have irreparable consequences. The detention is an extremely severe intervention of the State in a fundamental right, the mechanisms used for its application are to be subject to the strictest requirements, which determine the competence of the intervention and the means of ensuring respect for the rights of the detained person. In the present study, the detention was investigated in the light of the principle of proportionality, in order to assess the appropriateness of its conduct, analyzing the reasonable suspicion, the complexity of the criminal investigation, the nature of the crime under investigation, the conduct of the perpetrator and many other circumstances, which influences the need to limit freedom for a short time.","PeriodicalId":254422,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual freedom from the perspective of detention and the principle of proportionality\",\"authors\":\"Domnița Vizdoagă\",\"doi\":\"10.52277/1857-2405.2022.2(61).01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although some limitations of the right to liberty are allowed, these measures must be applied in strict accordance with the law, guaranteeing the protection of any person against arbitrary or abusive detention, as the effects of such violations can have irreparable consequences. The detention is an extremely severe intervention of the State in a fundamental right, the mechanisms used for its application are to be subject to the strictest requirements, which determine the competence of the intervention and the means of ensuring respect for the rights of the detained person. In the present study, the detention was investigated in the light of the principle of proportionality, in order to assess the appropriateness of its conduct, analyzing the reasonable suspicion, the complexity of the criminal investigation, the nature of the crime under investigation, the conduct of the perpetrator and many other circumstances, which influences the need to limit freedom for a short time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2022.2(61).01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the National Institute of Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52277/1857-2405.2022.2(61).01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然允许对自由权进行一些限制,但必须严格按照法律实施这些措施,保证保护任何人不受任意或虐待拘留,因为这种侵犯行为的后果可能造成无法弥补的后果。拘留是国家对一项基本权利的极其严重的干预,用于实施这种干预的机制应符合最严格的要求,这些要求决定了干预的权限和确保尊重被拘留者权利的手段。在本研究中,根据相称性原则对拘留进行了调查,以便评估其行为的适当性,分析合理怀疑、刑事调查的复杂性、所调查罪行的性质、犯罪者的行为和许多其他情况,这些情况影响到需要在短时间内限制自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Individual freedom from the perspective of detention and the principle of proportionality
Although some limitations of the right to liberty are allowed, these measures must be applied in strict accordance with the law, guaranteeing the protection of any person against arbitrary or abusive detention, as the effects of such violations can have irreparable consequences. The detention is an extremely severe intervention of the State in a fundamental right, the mechanisms used for its application are to be subject to the strictest requirements, which determine the competence of the intervention and the means of ensuring respect for the rights of the detained person. In the present study, the detention was investigated in the light of the principle of proportionality, in order to assess the appropriateness of its conduct, analyzing the reasonable suspicion, the complexity of the criminal investigation, the nature of the crime under investigation, the conduct of the perpetrator and many other circumstances, which influences the need to limit freedom for a short time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of informational technologies in the education of drtainees: foreign experience and legal regulation Criminological specificity of war crimes, their difference from crimes against humanity and genocide Applicability of the ECHR case law within the judicial higher Court remedy examination Presumption of innocence in the doctrinal and regulatory sources of Western Europe (XIX-XX centuries) The presumption of lack of sexual consent in the case of a minor victim: a model of inspiration for the Moldovan legislator?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1