项目目标设定的理论框架:尼日利亚组织实践的定性案例研究。

O. Ogbeiwi
{"title":"项目目标设定的理论框架:尼日利亚组织实践的定性案例研究。","authors":"O. Ogbeiwi","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nGoal-setting in any practice context is vague unless the process is based on a framework that produces good goals. Popular goal-setting frameworks construct Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, and Time-bound (SMART) goal statements. Yet, research of how healthcare goals that are foundational to health plans are formulated is scanty. This case study explored the goal-setting practice of an organisation in Nigeria to discover the theoretical frameworks for setting the goals of their leprosy projects.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe study triangulated individual semi-structured interviews of 10 leprosy managers with a review of their project plans and a participant observation of the organisation's annual planning event. A five-stage thematic analysis was used to serially identify, code, and integrate goal-setting themes from the data collected.\n\n\nFINDINGS\nThis produced three final emergent themes: stakeholders, strategy, and goal statements, with 11 associated conceptual frameworks. All were further theoretically integrated into one general framework that illustrates the organisational goal-setting practice at the time of study. This revealed a practice with a four-staged linear centre-driven process that led to a top-down, problem-based goal formulation, and produced assigned project plans based on hierarchical non-SMART goal statements.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nCollaborative goal-setting process is proposed for Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Timed, and Agreeable statements of project objectives and aims written with Change, Beneficiaries, Indicator, Target, Timeframe and Change, Beneficiaries, Location, and Timeframe models respectively.","PeriodicalId":250539,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of health planning and management","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical frameworks for project goal-setting: A qualitative case study of an organisational practice in Nigeria.\",\"authors\":\"O. Ogbeiwi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpm.3471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\nGoal-setting in any practice context is vague unless the process is based on a framework that produces good goals. Popular goal-setting frameworks construct Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, and Time-bound (SMART) goal statements. Yet, research of how healthcare goals that are foundational to health plans are formulated is scanty. This case study explored the goal-setting practice of an organisation in Nigeria to discover the theoretical frameworks for setting the goals of their leprosy projects.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThe study triangulated individual semi-structured interviews of 10 leprosy managers with a review of their project plans and a participant observation of the organisation's annual planning event. A five-stage thematic analysis was used to serially identify, code, and integrate goal-setting themes from the data collected.\\n\\n\\nFINDINGS\\nThis produced three final emergent themes: stakeholders, strategy, and goal statements, with 11 associated conceptual frameworks. All were further theoretically integrated into one general framework that illustrates the organisational goal-setting practice at the time of study. This revealed a practice with a four-staged linear centre-driven process that led to a top-down, problem-based goal formulation, and produced assigned project plans based on hierarchical non-SMART goal statements.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nCollaborative goal-setting process is proposed for Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Timed, and Agreeable statements of project objectives and aims written with Change, Beneficiaries, Indicator, Target, Timeframe and Change, Beneficiaries, Location, and Timeframe models respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":250539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International journal of health planning and management\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International journal of health planning and management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3471\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of health planning and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在任何实践环境中,目标的设定都是模糊的,除非这个过程是基于一个产生良好目标的框架。流行的目标设定框架构建了具体的、可测量的、可实现的、现实的和有时限的(SMART)目标声明。然而,关于作为健康计划基础的医疗保健目标是如何制定的研究却很少。本案例研究探讨了尼日利亚一个组织的目标设定实践,以发现为其麻风病项目设定目标的理论框架。方法:本研究对10名麻风病管理人员进行了半结构化的访谈,回顾了他们的项目计划,并参与观察了该组织的年度计划活动。采用五阶段主题分析,从收集的数据中依次确定、编码和整合目标设定主题。这产生了三个最终涌现的主题:利益相关者、战略和目标声明,以及11个相关的概念框架。所有这些都进一步在理论上整合到一个总体框架中,说明了研究时组织目标设定的实践。这揭示了一个四阶段线性中心驱动过程的实践,该过程导致了自上而下的、基于问题的目标制定,并基于分层非smart目标声明产生了分配的项目计划。针对具体的、可测量的、可实现的、现实的、时间的和可同意的项目目标和目的陈述,建议采用协作目标设定流程,分别用变更、受益人、指标、目标、时间框架和变更、受益人、地点和时间框架模型来编写。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Theoretical frameworks for project goal-setting: A qualitative case study of an organisational practice in Nigeria.
INTRODUCTION Goal-setting in any practice context is vague unless the process is based on a framework that produces good goals. Popular goal-setting frameworks construct Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, and Time-bound (SMART) goal statements. Yet, research of how healthcare goals that are foundational to health plans are formulated is scanty. This case study explored the goal-setting practice of an organisation in Nigeria to discover the theoretical frameworks for setting the goals of their leprosy projects. METHODS The study triangulated individual semi-structured interviews of 10 leprosy managers with a review of their project plans and a participant observation of the organisation's annual planning event. A five-stage thematic analysis was used to serially identify, code, and integrate goal-setting themes from the data collected. FINDINGS This produced three final emergent themes: stakeholders, strategy, and goal statements, with 11 associated conceptual frameworks. All were further theoretically integrated into one general framework that illustrates the organisational goal-setting practice at the time of study. This revealed a practice with a four-staged linear centre-driven process that led to a top-down, problem-based goal formulation, and produced assigned project plans based on hierarchical non-SMART goal statements. CONCLUSION Collaborative goal-setting process is proposed for Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Timed, and Agreeable statements of project objectives and aims written with Change, Beneficiaries, Indicator, Target, Timeframe and Change, Beneficiaries, Location, and Timeframe models respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 vaccine wastage in Africa: A case of Nigeria. Financial issues in times of a COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary hospital in Mali. Improving access to maternal care in Africa through telemedicine and digital health. Foresight study on online health community: The perspective of knowledge empowerment for patients with chronic diseases. Evaluation of supply sustainability of vaccine alternatives with multi-criteria decision-making methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1