锯肌前平面阻滞与静脉使用阿片类药物治疗急性开胸术后疼痛

F. Badawy, Abd El-Rahman Hassan El-Rahman, K. Hassan, Asmaa Farghaly Gad-Allah, K. Abdelfattah
{"title":"锯肌前平面阻滞与静脉使用阿片类药物治疗急性开胸术后疼痛","authors":"F. Badawy, Abd El-Rahman Hassan El-Rahman, K. Hassan, Asmaa Farghaly Gad-Allah, K. Abdelfattah","doi":"10.4103/roaic.roaic_63_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Inadequate treatment of post-thoracotomy pain can lead to both acute impact on patient comfort and pulmonary function, and long-term pain interfering with patients’ regular activities for a long time. This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic effectiveness of serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) as a regional analgesic procedure in post-thoracotomy pain. Patients and methods In this randomized, prospective, interventional, single-center, and double-blind study, patients were randomly assigned into two groups of 30 patients each. Group A: patients were subjected to standard anesthesia and ultrasound-guided SAPB using 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine after induction of anesthesia. In addition, rescue postoperative intravenous opioid analgesia was used when needed to maintain the visual analog scale (VAS) at less than or equal to 3.Group B: standard anesthesia was done, and titrated postoperative intravenous opioid analgesia was used for post-thoracotomy pain relief to maintain the VAS at less than or equal to 3. Our primary outcome was to measure postoperative VAS at rest and on coughing up to 24 h postoperatively. Our secondary outcomes were to measure total intraoperative and postoperative opioid used, to record opioid use over time intervals, time to first postoperative opioid administration, and to assess opioid-related complications, all up to 24 h postoperatively. Results VAS at rest and on coughing up to 6 h postoperatively was significantly less in the SAPB group, and there was no significant difference between both groups from 6 h up to 24 h postoperatively. Total intravenous opioids used, total intraoperative fentanyl, total postoperative morphine, and time-related postoperative morphine up to 6 h postoperatively were significantly less in the SAPB group, and there was no significant difference between both groups from 6 up to 24 h postoperatively. The time to first postoperative opioid use was also significantly longer in the SAPB group. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided SAPB can be an effective technique for post-thoracotomy analgesia with probably better pain control compared with intravenous opioid analgesia alone, with less total opioid use.","PeriodicalId":151256,"journal":{"name":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Serratus anterior plane block versus intravenous opioid use for acute post-thoracotomy pain\",\"authors\":\"F. Badawy, Abd El-Rahman Hassan El-Rahman, K. Hassan, Asmaa Farghaly Gad-Allah, K. Abdelfattah\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/roaic.roaic_63_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Inadequate treatment of post-thoracotomy pain can lead to both acute impact on patient comfort and pulmonary function, and long-term pain interfering with patients’ regular activities for a long time. This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic effectiveness of serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) as a regional analgesic procedure in post-thoracotomy pain. Patients and methods In this randomized, prospective, interventional, single-center, and double-blind study, patients were randomly assigned into two groups of 30 patients each. Group A: patients were subjected to standard anesthesia and ultrasound-guided SAPB using 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine after induction of anesthesia. In addition, rescue postoperative intravenous opioid analgesia was used when needed to maintain the visual analog scale (VAS) at less than or equal to 3.Group B: standard anesthesia was done, and titrated postoperative intravenous opioid analgesia was used for post-thoracotomy pain relief to maintain the VAS at less than or equal to 3. Our primary outcome was to measure postoperative VAS at rest and on coughing up to 24 h postoperatively. Our secondary outcomes were to measure total intraoperative and postoperative opioid used, to record opioid use over time intervals, time to first postoperative opioid administration, and to assess opioid-related complications, all up to 24 h postoperatively. Results VAS at rest and on coughing up to 6 h postoperatively was significantly less in the SAPB group, and there was no significant difference between both groups from 6 h up to 24 h postoperatively. Total intravenous opioids used, total intraoperative fentanyl, total postoperative morphine, and time-related postoperative morphine up to 6 h postoperatively were significantly less in the SAPB group, and there was no significant difference between both groups from 6 up to 24 h postoperatively. The time to first postoperative opioid use was also significantly longer in the SAPB group. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided SAPB can be an effective technique for post-thoracotomy analgesia with probably better pain control compared with intravenous opioid analgesia alone, with less total opioid use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_63_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_63_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景对开胸术后疼痛治疗不当,既会急性影响患者的舒适度和肺功能,也会长期影响患者的正常活动。本研究旨在评估锯肌前平面阻滞(SAPB)作为一种局部镇痛方法对开胸术后疼痛的镇痛效果。在这项随机、前瞻性、介入性、单中心、双盲研究中,患者被随机分为两组,每组30例患者。A组:诱导麻醉后采用标准麻醉,超声引导下使用0.25%布比卡因30 ml进行SAPB。此外,当需要维持视觉模拟评分(VAS)小于或等于3分时,术后给予紧急静脉阿片类镇痛。B组:标准麻醉,术后静脉滴注阿片类镇痛用于开胸后镇痛,维持VAS≤3。我们的主要结果是测量术后休息时和术后24小时咳嗽时的VAS。我们的次要结果是测量术中和术后阿片类药物的总使用量,记录阿片类药物的使用时间间隔,术后第一次阿片类药物使用时间,并评估阿片类药物相关并发症,所有这些都持续到术后24小时。结果SAPB组术后6 h及休息时VAS评分明显低于对照组,术后6 h至24 h评分差异无统计学意义。SAPB组术后6 h静脉总阿片类药物用量、术中总芬太尼用量、术后总吗啡用量、术后时间相关吗啡用量均显著低于SAPB组,两组术后6 ~ 24 h无显著差异。SAPB组术后首次使用阿片类药物的时间也明显更长。结论超声引导下SAPB是一种有效的开胸后镇痛技术,与单纯静脉阿片类药物镇痛相比,其镇痛效果可能更好,且阿片类药物的总用量较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Serratus anterior plane block versus intravenous opioid use for acute post-thoracotomy pain
Background Inadequate treatment of post-thoracotomy pain can lead to both acute impact on patient comfort and pulmonary function, and long-term pain interfering with patients’ regular activities for a long time. This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic effectiveness of serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) as a regional analgesic procedure in post-thoracotomy pain. Patients and methods In this randomized, prospective, interventional, single-center, and double-blind study, patients were randomly assigned into two groups of 30 patients each. Group A: patients were subjected to standard anesthesia and ultrasound-guided SAPB using 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine after induction of anesthesia. In addition, rescue postoperative intravenous opioid analgesia was used when needed to maintain the visual analog scale (VAS) at less than or equal to 3.Group B: standard anesthesia was done, and titrated postoperative intravenous opioid analgesia was used for post-thoracotomy pain relief to maintain the VAS at less than or equal to 3. Our primary outcome was to measure postoperative VAS at rest and on coughing up to 24 h postoperatively. Our secondary outcomes were to measure total intraoperative and postoperative opioid used, to record opioid use over time intervals, time to first postoperative opioid administration, and to assess opioid-related complications, all up to 24 h postoperatively. Results VAS at rest and on coughing up to 6 h postoperatively was significantly less in the SAPB group, and there was no significant difference between both groups from 6 h up to 24 h postoperatively. Total intravenous opioids used, total intraoperative fentanyl, total postoperative morphine, and time-related postoperative morphine up to 6 h postoperatively were significantly less in the SAPB group, and there was no significant difference between both groups from 6 up to 24 h postoperatively. The time to first postoperative opioid use was also significantly longer in the SAPB group. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided SAPB can be an effective technique for post-thoracotomy analgesia with probably better pain control compared with intravenous opioid analgesia alone, with less total opioid use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of combined pulsed radiofrequency and steroid injection to the dorsal root ganglion in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a prospective randomized clinical trial Sacrococcygeal local anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia for pilonidal sinus surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study Role of enteral metoprolol tartrate on hemodynamics and clinical outcomes of septic shock patients of various pretargeted heart rate groups Prediction of protective lung tidal volume using the ulna length in Egyptian adults Characteristics and clinical outcomes of critically ill pregnant patients with COVID-19 disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1