消费者对强制仲裁的看法

Lisa Abraham, K. Carman
{"title":"消费者对强制仲裁的看法","authors":"Lisa Abraham, K. Carman","doi":"10.1257/rct.8928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mandatory arbitration clauses are now included in almost every contract that a consumer signs with a large corporation, such as banks, insurance companies, and cable and internet providers. Because these clauses are typically hidden in the fine print, consumers may have a limited understanding of these clauses, and under current law, consumers also have little recourse to fight mandatory arbitration clauses. As a result of these factors, little is known about consumers’ demand for services and products without such clauses. This project will be among the first to examine consumers’ understanding of mandatory arbitration, provide estimates of consumers’ willingness to pay for contracts without mandatory arbitration, and correlate how the provision of information changes consumers’ willingness to pay for contracts without mandatory arbitration.","PeriodicalId":129991,"journal":{"name":"AEA Randomized Controlled Trials","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumers’ Views about Mandatory Arbitration\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Abraham, K. Carman\",\"doi\":\"10.1257/rct.8928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mandatory arbitration clauses are now included in almost every contract that a consumer signs with a large corporation, such as banks, insurance companies, and cable and internet providers. Because these clauses are typically hidden in the fine print, consumers may have a limited understanding of these clauses, and under current law, consumers also have little recourse to fight mandatory arbitration clauses. As a result of these factors, little is known about consumers’ demand for services and products without such clauses. This project will be among the first to examine consumers’ understanding of mandatory arbitration, provide estimates of consumers’ willingness to pay for contracts without mandatory arbitration, and correlate how the provision of information changes consumers’ willingness to pay for contracts without mandatory arbitration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEA Randomized Controlled Trials\",\"volume\":\"135 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEA Randomized Controlled Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.8928\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEA Randomized Controlled Trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1257/rct.8928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

强制性仲裁条款现在几乎包含在消费者与大公司签订的每一份合同中,比如银行、保险公司、有线电视和互联网提供商。由于这些条款通常隐藏在细则中,消费者对这些条款的理解可能有限,而且在现行法律下,消费者也几乎没有追索权来对抗强制性仲裁条款。由于这些因素,我们对消费者对没有这些条款的服务和产品的需求知之甚少。这个项目将是第一个检验消费者对强制性仲裁的理解,提供消费者对没有强制性仲裁的合同支付意愿的估计,并关联信息的提供如何改变消费者对没有强制性仲裁的合同支付意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consumers’ Views about Mandatory Arbitration
Mandatory arbitration clauses are now included in almost every contract that a consumer signs with a large corporation, such as banks, insurance companies, and cable and internet providers. Because these clauses are typically hidden in the fine print, consumers may have a limited understanding of these clauses, and under current law, consumers also have little recourse to fight mandatory arbitration clauses. As a result of these factors, little is known about consumers’ demand for services and products without such clauses. This project will be among the first to examine consumers’ understanding of mandatory arbitration, provide estimates of consumers’ willingness to pay for contracts without mandatory arbitration, and correlate how the provision of information changes consumers’ willingness to pay for contracts without mandatory arbitration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Changing the System, Not the Seeker Can Information on School Attributes and Assignment Probabilities Direct Search and Choice? Evidence from Choice Platforms in Ecuador and Peru Behavioral Biases among Producers: Experimental Evidence of Anchoring in Procurement Auctions PUBLIC GOODS PROVISION, WELFARE POLICIES, AND GOVERNMENT SIZE Effectiveness of a Mayan language social media campaign on COVID-19 vaccine beliefs in Guatemala
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1