爱尔兰岛与“脱欧”——对脱欧协议草案的法律-政治批判

D. Schiek
{"title":"爱尔兰岛与“脱欧”——对脱欧协议草案的法律-政治批判","authors":"D. Schiek","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3150394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on a legal analysis of the position of the island of Ireland in the draft withdrawal agreement, this paper argues that the draft does neither fully protect socio-economic and civic cooperation between on the island of Ireland, nor do justice to the Agreement concluded in Belfast o Good Friday 1998 (the 1998 Agreement). While the common regulatory area is an ingenious proposal to keep Northern Ireland in the Customs Union as well as the EU Internal Market for goods (including agricultural goods and electricity), the fledgling service economy on the island of Ireland remains unprotected, as well as civic cooperation and an all-island services of (social) general interests such as (higher) education and health care. As a consequence, even the second draft falls short of fully safeguarding North-South cooperation on the island of Ireland. If that is to be achieved, Northern Ireland will have to remain not only in the Customs Union, but also in the Internal Market and covered by the EU citizenship acquis, including the anti-discrimination acquis. However, if Great Britain does not follow the same course, the existing constitutional divergence between Northern Ireland and Great Britain will become more pronounced. The draft is thus testimony to the decisive role of common EU membership of the UK and Ireland for safeguarding the 1998 Agreement.","PeriodicalId":141296,"journal":{"name":"Conflict Studies: International Cooperation eJournal","volume":"2011 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Island of Ireland and ‘Brexit’ – A Legal-Political Critique of the Draft Withdrawal Agreement\",\"authors\":\"D. Schiek\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3150394\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on a legal analysis of the position of the island of Ireland in the draft withdrawal agreement, this paper argues that the draft does neither fully protect socio-economic and civic cooperation between on the island of Ireland, nor do justice to the Agreement concluded in Belfast o Good Friday 1998 (the 1998 Agreement). While the common regulatory area is an ingenious proposal to keep Northern Ireland in the Customs Union as well as the EU Internal Market for goods (including agricultural goods and electricity), the fledgling service economy on the island of Ireland remains unprotected, as well as civic cooperation and an all-island services of (social) general interests such as (higher) education and health care. As a consequence, even the second draft falls short of fully safeguarding North-South cooperation on the island of Ireland. If that is to be achieved, Northern Ireland will have to remain not only in the Customs Union, but also in the Internal Market and covered by the EU citizenship acquis, including the anti-discrimination acquis. However, if Great Britain does not follow the same course, the existing constitutional divergence between Northern Ireland and Great Britain will become more pronounced. The draft is thus testimony to the decisive role of common EU membership of the UK and Ireland for safeguarding the 1998 Agreement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":141296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conflict Studies: International Cooperation eJournal\",\"volume\":\"2011 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conflict Studies: International Cooperation eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3150394\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict Studies: International Cooperation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3150394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

基于对爱尔兰岛在脱欧协议草案中的地位的法律分析,本文认为该草案既没有充分保护爱尔兰岛上的社会经济和公民合作,也没有公正地对待1998年耶稣受难日在贝尔法斯特达成的协议(1998年协议)。虽然共同监管区域是一项巧妙的提议,旨在将北爱尔兰留在关税同盟以及欧盟商品(包括农产品和电力)内部市场,但爱尔兰岛上羽翼未丰的服务经济,以及公民合作和(高等)教育和医疗保健等(社会)普遍利益的全岛服务仍然不受保护。因此,即使是第二份草案也未能充分保障爱尔兰岛上的南北合作。如果要实现这一目标,北爱尔兰不仅必须留在关税同盟,而且必须留在内部市场,并受到欧盟公民资格规定的保护,包括反歧视规定。然而,如果大不列颠不遵循同样的路线,北爱尔兰和大不列颠之间现有的宪法分歧将变得更加明显。因此,该草案证明了英国和爱尔兰作为欧盟共同成员国在维护1998年协议方面的决定性作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Island of Ireland and ‘Brexit’ – A Legal-Political Critique of the Draft Withdrawal Agreement
Based on a legal analysis of the position of the island of Ireland in the draft withdrawal agreement, this paper argues that the draft does neither fully protect socio-economic and civic cooperation between on the island of Ireland, nor do justice to the Agreement concluded in Belfast o Good Friday 1998 (the 1998 Agreement). While the common regulatory area is an ingenious proposal to keep Northern Ireland in the Customs Union as well as the EU Internal Market for goods (including agricultural goods and electricity), the fledgling service economy on the island of Ireland remains unprotected, as well as civic cooperation and an all-island services of (social) general interests such as (higher) education and health care. As a consequence, even the second draft falls short of fully safeguarding North-South cooperation on the island of Ireland. If that is to be achieved, Northern Ireland will have to remain not only in the Customs Union, but also in the Internal Market and covered by the EU citizenship acquis, including the anti-discrimination acquis. However, if Great Britain does not follow the same course, the existing constitutional divergence between Northern Ireland and Great Britain will become more pronounced. The draft is thus testimony to the decisive role of common EU membership of the UK and Ireland for safeguarding the 1998 Agreement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Public Country-by-Country Reporting: Corporate Law, Fiscal Law and the Principle of Unanimity No Country is an Island: International Cooperation and Climate Change The Political Economy of Foreign Sovereign Immunity Extraterritorial Obligations in the United Nations System: U.N. Treaty-Based Bodies China India in Afghanistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1