{"title":"工程教育与实践的战略框架","authors":"Anthony Quayle","doi":"10.1109/TEE.2010.5508869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emerging initiatives in engineering education can often appear partial in isolation. An integrated strategic framework for engineering education and practice is presented to support defining a roadmap of knowledge and skills for future engineers. The framework comprises the three domain pillars of engineering science, design and commercialization with a contextual element of management, culture and professionalization. Each pillar has a vertical hierarchy of knowledge, methods, skills and transition to practice from freshman to senior professional and above. Relative weaknesses in knowledge, methods, skills and transition to practice are highlighted in the design pillar and contrasted unfavorably with clinical teaching in medicine. The lack of a recognized route in technology commercialization is highlighted. Strategies suggested by the framework include: a broader integrative foundation on entry; teaching a more explicit sense of professionalization; professional degrees in the design and commercialization pillars; and strengthened post-experience teaching of engineering approaches across adjacent professional domains, a skill increasingly important in large scale systems engineering. A set of high-level strategic actions is derived from the framework for defining more detailed initiatives for a roadmap of knowledge and skills for future engineers.","PeriodicalId":201873,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skills for Complex Global Environments","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Strategic Framework for Engineering Education and Practice\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Quayle\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEE.2010.5508869\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Emerging initiatives in engineering education can often appear partial in isolation. An integrated strategic framework for engineering education and practice is presented to support defining a roadmap of knowledge and skills for future engineers. The framework comprises the three domain pillars of engineering science, design and commercialization with a contextual element of management, culture and professionalization. Each pillar has a vertical hierarchy of knowledge, methods, skills and transition to practice from freshman to senior professional and above. Relative weaknesses in knowledge, methods, skills and transition to practice are highlighted in the design pillar and contrasted unfavorably with clinical teaching in medicine. The lack of a recognized route in technology commercialization is highlighted. Strategies suggested by the framework include: a broader integrative foundation on entry; teaching a more explicit sense of professionalization; professional degrees in the design and commercialization pillars; and strengthened post-experience teaching of engineering approaches across adjacent professional domains, a skill increasingly important in large scale systems engineering. A set of high-level strategic actions is derived from the framework for defining more detailed initiatives for a roadmap of knowledge and skills for future engineers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skills for Complex Global Environments\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skills for Complex Global Environments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEE.2010.5508869\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skills for Complex Global Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TEE.2010.5508869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

工程教育中出现的新举措往往是部分孤立的。提出了工程教育和实践的综合战略框架,以支持为未来工程师定义知识和技能的路线图。该框架包括工程科学、设计和商业化三大领域的支柱,并结合管理、文化和专业化的背景元素。每个支柱都有垂直层次的知识、方法、技能和从大一到高级专业人员及以上的实践过渡。设计支柱突出了在知识、方法、技能和向实践过渡方面的相对弱点,与医学临床教学形成了不利的对比。在技术商业化方面缺乏公认的路线是突出问题。该框架建议的战略包括:在进入时建立更广泛的综合基础;教学专业化意识更加明确;设计和商业化支柱专业学位;并在相邻的专业领域加强工程方法的经验后教学,这是一项在大规模系统工程中日益重要的技能。一组高层次的战略行动是从框架中衍生出来的,用于为未来工程师的知识和技能路线图定义更详细的计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Strategic Framework for Engineering Education and Practice
Emerging initiatives in engineering education can often appear partial in isolation. An integrated strategic framework for engineering education and practice is presented to support defining a roadmap of knowledge and skills for future engineers. The framework comprises the three domain pillars of engineering science, design and commercialization with a contextual element of management, culture and professionalization. Each pillar has a vertical hierarchy of knowledge, methods, skills and transition to practice from freshman to senior professional and above. Relative weaknesses in knowledge, methods, skills and transition to practice are highlighted in the design pillar and contrasted unfavorably with clinical teaching in medicine. The lack of a recognized route in technology commercialization is highlighted. Strategies suggested by the framework include: a broader integrative foundation on entry; teaching a more explicit sense of professionalization; professional degrees in the design and commercialization pillars; and strengthened post-experience teaching of engineering approaches across adjacent professional domains, a skill increasingly important in large scale systems engineering. A set of high-level strategic actions is derived from the framework for defining more detailed initiatives for a roadmap of knowledge and skills for future engineers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adapting Engineering Education Curriculum for Global Competiveness in Developing Countries Multidisciplinary Engineering Systems Graduate Education: Master of Engineering in Mechatronics Services Science Curriculum: Design and Web-Based Delivery Developing a Sustainable Engineering Education in the Middle East and North Africa Region A Model of Cross Disciplinary Education, Technology Transfer and Teaching Non-Technical Skills for Engineers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1