新自由主义和公司:相互矛盾和腐败

David Ciepley
{"title":"新自由主义和公司:相互矛盾和腐败","authors":"David Ciepley","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3230520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neoliberalism and the corporate economy stand in fundamental contradiction. First, corporations are created and sustained through government intervention in the economy, contradicting neoliberal strictures. Second, the neoliberal attempt, in the face of this contradiction, to better square the corporation with free market principles, by treating it as a private partnership of stockholders as opposed to a state franchise, renders the corporation dysfunctional. Particularly damaging has been the application of a distorted version of agency theory that, as I show, is indebted to game theory, in which stockholders are modeled as the “principal” and management (and workers) as their opportunistic agent. This exaggerated “agency problem” has been addressed through a massive reallocation of firm revenues, from reinvestment and workers, to executives and stockholders. Far from supercharging capital accumulation, as widely assumed, neoliberalism has the opposite effect, decapitalizing the corporation, the state, and the worker in order to enrich the stockholder and stock-compensated executive. In contradiction to its ideals, neoliberalism applied to a corporate economy lowers investment, slows growth, heightens irresponsibility, intensifies worker coercion, and sharply raises economic inequality. And for all this, it fails to reduce the corporation’s dependence on government intervention.","PeriodicalId":185902,"journal":{"name":"Investment & Social Responsibility eJournal","volume":"239 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neoliberalism and the Corporation: Mutually Contradictory and Corrupting\",\"authors\":\"David Ciepley\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3230520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neoliberalism and the corporate economy stand in fundamental contradiction. First, corporations are created and sustained through government intervention in the economy, contradicting neoliberal strictures. Second, the neoliberal attempt, in the face of this contradiction, to better square the corporation with free market principles, by treating it as a private partnership of stockholders as opposed to a state franchise, renders the corporation dysfunctional. Particularly damaging has been the application of a distorted version of agency theory that, as I show, is indebted to game theory, in which stockholders are modeled as the “principal” and management (and workers) as their opportunistic agent. This exaggerated “agency problem” has been addressed through a massive reallocation of firm revenues, from reinvestment and workers, to executives and stockholders. Far from supercharging capital accumulation, as widely assumed, neoliberalism has the opposite effect, decapitalizing the corporation, the state, and the worker in order to enrich the stockholder and stock-compensated executive. In contradiction to its ideals, neoliberalism applied to a corporate economy lowers investment, slows growth, heightens irresponsibility, intensifies worker coercion, and sharply raises economic inequality. And for all this, it fails to reduce the corporation’s dependence on government intervention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":185902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investment & Social Responsibility eJournal\",\"volume\":\"239 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investment & Social Responsibility eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3230520\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investment & Social Responsibility eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3230520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

新自由主义与公司经济存在根本矛盾。首先,公司是通过政府对经济的干预而创建和维持的,这与新自由主义的限制相矛盾。其次,面对这种矛盾,新自由主义试图通过将公司视为股东的私人伙伴关系而不是国家特许经营来更好地将公司与自由市场原则结合起来,从而使公司功能失调。特别具有破坏性的是对代理理论的扭曲版本的应用,正如我所指出的,它得益于博弈论,在博弈论中,股东被建模为“委托人”,管理层(和工人)被建模为他们的机会主义代理人。这种被夸大的“代理问题”已经通过企业收入的大规模再分配得到了解决,从再投资和工人,到高管和股东。新自由主义远没有像人们普遍认为的那样加速资本积累,而是产生了相反的效果,使公司、国家和工人的资本减少,以使股东和获得股票补偿的高管变得富裕。与其理想相悖的是,新自由主义适用于企业经济,会降低投资,减缓增长,加剧不负责任,加剧对工人的胁迫,并急剧加剧经济不平等。尽管如此,它未能减少公司对政府干预的依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neoliberalism and the Corporation: Mutually Contradictory and Corrupting
Neoliberalism and the corporate economy stand in fundamental contradiction. First, corporations are created and sustained through government intervention in the economy, contradicting neoliberal strictures. Second, the neoliberal attempt, in the face of this contradiction, to better square the corporation with free market principles, by treating it as a private partnership of stockholders as opposed to a state franchise, renders the corporation dysfunctional. Particularly damaging has been the application of a distorted version of agency theory that, as I show, is indebted to game theory, in which stockholders are modeled as the “principal” and management (and workers) as their opportunistic agent. This exaggerated “agency problem” has been addressed through a massive reallocation of firm revenues, from reinvestment and workers, to executives and stockholders. Far from supercharging capital accumulation, as widely assumed, neoliberalism has the opposite effect, decapitalizing the corporation, the state, and the worker in order to enrich the stockholder and stock-compensated executive. In contradiction to its ideals, neoliberalism applied to a corporate economy lowers investment, slows growth, heightens irresponsibility, intensifies worker coercion, and sharply raises economic inequality. And for all this, it fails to reduce the corporation’s dependence on government intervention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unlocking ESG Premium from Options Chasing the ESG Factor Renewable Governance: Good for the Environment? Corporate Social Irresponsibility and Portfolio Performance: A Cross-National Study Climate Change and India’s Capital Market: Do Investors Care about Climate Change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1