{"title":"马氏族的民族志概念","authors":"Bongani Nyoka","doi":"10.1080/18186874.2019.1587587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In classical anthropology, the term “ethnography” refers to the scientific description of races. Yet, Archie Mafeje uses the concept of ethnography in what seems to be two ways. On the one hand, ethnography, such as he conceives of it, has socio-cultural connotations. It is his preferred substitute for the nebulous concept of “culture”. On the other hand, by ethnography he seems to refer to the idea of non-disciplinarity. In other words, the concept of ethnography becomes the substitute candidate for the social sciences, as they are conventionally known. Either the concept carries both meanings or Mafeje simply equivocates. This article discusses Mafeje's concept of ethnography. First, the article contextualises the discussion by providing a broad outline of his theoretical orientation. Second, given that his use of the concept of ethnography departs from that of an anthropological research method, the concept is explained and outlined. The remainder of the article demonstrates how Mafeje sets this concept to work by discussing his study of the tributary mode of production of the pre-colonial interlacustrine kingdoms of the Great Lakes region.","PeriodicalId":256939,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Concept of Ethnography in Mafeje\",\"authors\":\"Bongani Nyoka\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18186874.2019.1587587\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In classical anthropology, the term “ethnography” refers to the scientific description of races. Yet, Archie Mafeje uses the concept of ethnography in what seems to be two ways. On the one hand, ethnography, such as he conceives of it, has socio-cultural connotations. It is his preferred substitute for the nebulous concept of “culture”. On the other hand, by ethnography he seems to refer to the idea of non-disciplinarity. In other words, the concept of ethnography becomes the substitute candidate for the social sciences, as they are conventionally known. Either the concept carries both meanings or Mafeje simply equivocates. This article discusses Mafeje's concept of ethnography. First, the article contextualises the discussion by providing a broad outline of his theoretical orientation. Second, given that his use of the concept of ethnography departs from that of an anthropological research method, the concept is explained and outlined. The remainder of the article demonstrates how Mafeje sets this concept to work by discussing his study of the tributary mode of production of the pre-colonial interlacustrine kingdoms of the Great Lakes region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18186874.2019.1587587\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18186874.2019.1587587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在古典人类学中,“民族志”一词指的是对种族的科学描述。然而,阿奇·马杰似乎以两种方式使用了民族志的概念。一方面,民族志,如他所设想的,具有社会文化内涵。他更喜欢用这个词来代替“文化”这个模糊的概念。另一方面,通过民族志,他似乎指的是非纪律性的概念。换句话说,民族志的概念成为社会科学的替代品,因为它们通常被称为社会科学。要么这个概念有两种含义,要么majee只是在含糊其辞。本文讨论了马杰的民族志概念。首先,文章通过提供他的理论取向的大致轮廓,将讨论置于语境中。其次,考虑到他对民族志概念的使用与人类学研究方法的使用不同,对这个概念进行了解释和概述。本文的其余部分通过讨论maeje对大湖地区前殖民时期湖间王国的支流生产模式的研究,展示了他是如何将这一概念付诸实践的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Concept of Ethnography in Mafeje
Abstract In classical anthropology, the term “ethnography” refers to the scientific description of races. Yet, Archie Mafeje uses the concept of ethnography in what seems to be two ways. On the one hand, ethnography, such as he conceives of it, has socio-cultural connotations. It is his preferred substitute for the nebulous concept of “culture”. On the other hand, by ethnography he seems to refer to the idea of non-disciplinarity. In other words, the concept of ethnography becomes the substitute candidate for the social sciences, as they are conventionally known. Either the concept carries both meanings or Mafeje simply equivocates. This article discusses Mafeje's concept of ethnography. First, the article contextualises the discussion by providing a broad outline of his theoretical orientation. Second, given that his use of the concept of ethnography departs from that of an anthropological research method, the concept is explained and outlined. The remainder of the article demonstrates how Mafeje sets this concept to work by discussing his study of the tributary mode of production of the pre-colonial interlacustrine kingdoms of the Great Lakes region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Afrocentric Analysis of the Practicality of Radical Economic Transformation in the Context of South Africa–China Relations, 2013–2017 Lembede's Afrika for the Afrikans and the Azanian Tradition Today: A Comparative Analysis of Two Forms of Afrikan Nationalism in “South Africa” Is Ifá Divination Girded by Logic? A Case for Ezumezu Logic African Thought and Western (European) Misconception: An Afrocentric Paradigm In Search of Authentic Personhood: An Existentialist Reading of Femi Osofisan’s Tẹgọnni: An African Antigone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1