最近墨西哥、澳大利亚和中国媒体对美国超级大国的矛盾评价

Christian Jimenez
{"title":"最近墨西哥、澳大利亚和中国媒体对美国超级大国的矛盾评价","authors":"Christian Jimenez","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-9312-6.CH002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"America as a superpower is alleged to be able to set the news agenda through framing devices that even foreign media often mimics. A noteworthy theory explaining how this agenda is set is given by E.S. Hermann and Noam Chomsky in their propaganda model (PM). The PM model would assume educated elites in the US and in other comparable states (like China) will simply reiterate the framing narrative given by a state. Five films from non-American directors are selected and several issues the state has a consensus on are used (immigration, Iraq) to test the PM. In only three cases was the PM confirmed and even in those not for the reasons given by Hermann and Chomsky. In two cases the PM was moderately disconfirmed. While the PM is a valuable model, it needs refinement by taking more seriously how ideas by social groups in society such as feminism and gender equality complicate the agenda of the state. The conclusion makes recommendations how the PM can be better built to examine how non-Americans view America through film and the mass media.","PeriodicalId":186144,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Media, Entertainment, and the Arts","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"America as Ambivalent Superpower in Recent Mexican, Australian, and Chinese Media\",\"authors\":\"Christian Jimenez\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/978-1-5225-9312-6.CH002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"America as a superpower is alleged to be able to set the news agenda through framing devices that even foreign media often mimics. A noteworthy theory explaining how this agenda is set is given by E.S. Hermann and Noam Chomsky in their propaganda model (PM). The PM model would assume educated elites in the US and in other comparable states (like China) will simply reiterate the framing narrative given by a state. Five films from non-American directors are selected and several issues the state has a consensus on are used (immigration, Iraq) to test the PM. In only three cases was the PM confirmed and even in those not for the reasons given by Hermann and Chomsky. In two cases the PM was moderately disconfirmed. While the PM is a valuable model, it needs refinement by taking more seriously how ideas by social groups in society such as feminism and gender equality complicate the agenda of the state. The conclusion makes recommendations how the PM can be better built to examine how non-Americans view America through film and the mass media.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Media, Entertainment, and the Arts\",\"volume\":\"155 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Media, Entertainment, and the Arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9312-6.CH002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Media, Entertainment, and the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-9312-6.CH002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

作为一个超级大国,美国据称能够通过框架装置设定新闻议程,甚至外国媒体也经常模仿这些装置。赫尔曼(E.S. Hermann)和乔姆斯基(Noam Chomsky)在他们的宣传模型(PM)中给出了一个值得注意的理论来解释这一议程是如何设定的。总理模型会假设美国和其他类似国家(如中国)的受过教育的精英们会简单地重申一个国家给出的框架叙事。选出了五部非美国导演的电影,并使用了几个国家达成共识的问题(移民,伊拉克)来测试总理。在只有三种情况下,总理得到了确认,甚至在那些没有赫尔曼和乔姆斯基给出的原因。在两个病例中,PM是中度不确定的。虽然总理是一个有价值的榜样,但他需要改进,更认真地对待女权主义和性别平等等社会团体的想法如何使国家议程复杂化。结论提出了建议,如何更好地建立PM,以检查非美国人如何通过电影和大众媒体看待美国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
America as Ambivalent Superpower in Recent Mexican, Australian, and Chinese Media
America as a superpower is alleged to be able to set the news agenda through framing devices that even foreign media often mimics. A noteworthy theory explaining how this agenda is set is given by E.S. Hermann and Noam Chomsky in their propaganda model (PM). The PM model would assume educated elites in the US and in other comparable states (like China) will simply reiterate the framing narrative given by a state. Five films from non-American directors are selected and several issues the state has a consensus on are used (immigration, Iraq) to test the PM. In only three cases was the PM confirmed and even in those not for the reasons given by Hermann and Chomsky. In two cases the PM was moderately disconfirmed. While the PM is a valuable model, it needs refinement by taking more seriously how ideas by social groups in society such as feminism and gender equality complicate the agenda of the state. The conclusion makes recommendations how the PM can be better built to examine how non-Americans view America through film and the mass media.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sustaining Creativity and the Arts in the Digital Age Handbook of Research on Issues, Challenges, and Opportunities in Sustainable Architecture Exploring Gender Studies and Feminism through Literature and Media Handbook of Research on Connecting Philosophy, Media, and Development in Developing Countries “Too Good to Be True”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1