蒙古高原SMOS和AMSR-E土壤水分产品时空特征对比

X. Wen, Hui Lu, Chengwei Li
{"title":"蒙古高原SMOS和AMSR-E土壤水分产品时空特征对比","authors":"X. Wen, Hui Lu, Chengwei Li","doi":"10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7325855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we inter-compared the spatial-temporal characteristics of SMOS and AMSR-E soil moisture products over Mongolia plateau. The results show that in temporal scale, the standard deviation of SMOS soil moisture data is higher than JAXA and ECMWF products, comparable to the in situ observation. To demonstrate the spatial variation of SMOS and JAXA soil moisture products, we first defined the smoothness index (SSI). The mean and maximum value of SSI of SMOS are much higher than those of JAXA and ECMWF for both daily and monthly soil moisture products. The mean value of SSI of daily SMOS products is 1.284, while that of JAXA and ECMWF is 0.010 and 5.010@10-4, respectively. For monthly products, the mean value of SSI of SMOS is 0.264, while the value of JAXA is 0.004, and 3.753*10-4 for ECMWF. Further, we counted the SSI of SMOS and JAXA TB, and the SSI mean value of SMOS TB is higher than that of JAXA TB for both daily and monthly time scale. It indicates that the big uncertainty of SMOS soil moisture products may raises from the unstable TB observation, which is highly contaminated by RFI and even cannot be removed at monthly scale.","PeriodicalId":125717,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An intercomparison of the spatial-temporal characteristics of SMOS and AMSR-E soil moisture products over Mongolia plateau\",\"authors\":\"X. Wen, Hui Lu, Chengwei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7325855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, we inter-compared the spatial-temporal characteristics of SMOS and AMSR-E soil moisture products over Mongolia plateau. The results show that in temporal scale, the standard deviation of SMOS soil moisture data is higher than JAXA and ECMWF products, comparable to the in situ observation. To demonstrate the spatial variation of SMOS and JAXA soil moisture products, we first defined the smoothness index (SSI). The mean and maximum value of SSI of SMOS are much higher than those of JAXA and ECMWF for both daily and monthly soil moisture products. The mean value of SSI of daily SMOS products is 1.284, while that of JAXA and ECMWF is 0.010 and 5.010@10-4, respectively. For monthly products, the mean value of SSI of SMOS is 0.264, while the value of JAXA is 0.004, and 3.753*10-4 for ECMWF. Further, we counted the SSI of SMOS and JAXA TB, and the SSI mean value of SMOS TB is higher than that of JAXA TB for both daily and monthly time scale. It indicates that the big uncertainty of SMOS soil moisture products may raises from the unstable TB observation, which is highly contaminated by RFI and even cannot be removed at monthly scale.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS)\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7325855\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7325855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究对蒙古高原SMOS和AMSR-E土壤水分产品的时空特征进行了对比。结果表明:在时间尺度上,SMOS土壤湿度数据的标准偏差高于JAXA和ECMWF产品,与现场观测结果相当;为了展示SMOS和JAXA土壤水分产品的空间变化,我们首先定义了平滑指数(SSI)。SMOS的日、月土壤水分产品SSI均值和最大值均远高于JAXA和ECMWF。SMOS日产品的SSI平均值为1.284,JAXA和ECMWF的SSI平均值分别为0.010和5.010@10-4。月度产品SMOS的SSI平均值为0.264,JAXA的SSI平均值为0.004,ECMWF的SSI平均值为3.753*10-4。此外,我们对SMOS和JAXA TB的SSI进行了统计,SMOS TB的SSI平均值在日和月时间尺度上都高于JAXA TB。这表明SMOS土壤水分产品的不确定性很大,可能是由于TB观测不稳定,受RFI污染严重,甚至无法在月尺度上消除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An intercomparison of the spatial-temporal characteristics of SMOS and AMSR-E soil moisture products over Mongolia plateau
In this study, we inter-compared the spatial-temporal characteristics of SMOS and AMSR-E soil moisture products over Mongolia plateau. The results show that in temporal scale, the standard deviation of SMOS soil moisture data is higher than JAXA and ECMWF products, comparable to the in situ observation. To demonstrate the spatial variation of SMOS and JAXA soil moisture products, we first defined the smoothness index (SSI). The mean and maximum value of SSI of SMOS are much higher than those of JAXA and ECMWF for both daily and monthly soil moisture products. The mean value of SSI of daily SMOS products is 1.284, while that of JAXA and ECMWF is 0.010 and 5.010@10-4, respectively. For monthly products, the mean value of SSI of SMOS is 0.264, while the value of JAXA is 0.004, and 3.753*10-4 for ECMWF. Further, we counted the SSI of SMOS and JAXA TB, and the SSI mean value of SMOS TB is higher than that of JAXA TB for both daily and monthly time scale. It indicates that the big uncertainty of SMOS soil moisture products may raises from the unstable TB observation, which is highly contaminated by RFI and even cannot be removed at monthly scale.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interferometric and polarimetric methods to determine SWE, fresh snow depth and the anisotropy of dry snow Usefulness assessment of polarimetric parameters for line extraction from agricultural areas DEM and DHM reconstruction in tropical forests: Tomographic results at P-band with three flight tracks Nationwide ground deformation monitoring by persistent scatterer interferometry MICAP (Microwave imager combined active and passive): A new instrument for Chinese ocean salinity satellite
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1