转介儿童听觉加工障碍(APD)筛查工具的评估

L. Sanchez, Emilie Lam
{"title":"转介儿童听觉加工障碍(APD)筛查工具的评估","authors":"L. Sanchez, Emilie Lam","doi":"10.1375/AUDI.29.1.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is increased recognition of auditory processing disorder (APD) as a significant disorder, predominantly of childhood, which typically has broad effects on the development of communication and educational and social skills. Accordingly, reconsideration of screening children for APD is warranted, either in whole populations or high risk groups. This study investigated the sensitivity and specificity of four instruments, audiological and non audiological, against diagnostic outcome in a clinical sample of 23 children, aged 7-10 years, referred for assessment of their auditory processing abilities. One instrument, the Competing Sentences Test, which is a subtest of the SCAN-A, met the study's statistical and practicality criteria for a potential screening test. A cut off score for the left ear of four out of 10 gave a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 61%. Further research is needed to test the Competing Sentences Test, and other instruments, on larger samples of children for their potential as screening tests for APD.","PeriodicalId":114768,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Screening Instruments for Auditory Processing Disorder (APD) in a Sample of Referred Children\",\"authors\":\"L. Sanchez, Emilie Lam\",\"doi\":\"10.1375/AUDI.29.1.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is increased recognition of auditory processing disorder (APD) as a significant disorder, predominantly of childhood, which typically has broad effects on the development of communication and educational and social skills. Accordingly, reconsideration of screening children for APD is warranted, either in whole populations or high risk groups. This study investigated the sensitivity and specificity of four instruments, audiological and non audiological, against diagnostic outcome in a clinical sample of 23 children, aged 7-10 years, referred for assessment of their auditory processing abilities. One instrument, the Competing Sentences Test, which is a subtest of the SCAN-A, met the study's statistical and practicality criteria for a potential screening test. A cut off score for the left ear of four out of 10 gave a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 61%. Further research is needed to test the Competing Sentences Test, and other instruments, on larger samples of children for their potential as screening tests for APD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1375/AUDI.29.1.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1375/AUDI.29.1.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

越来越多的人认识到听觉处理障碍(APD)是一种重要的障碍,主要发生在儿童时期,它通常对沟通、教育和社交技能的发展有广泛的影响。因此,重新考虑对儿童进行APD筛查是有必要的,无论是在整个人群中还是在高风险人群中。本研究对23名7-10岁儿童的临床样本进行了听力处理能力评估,研究了听力学和非听力学四种仪器对诊断结果的敏感性和特异性。作为SCAN-A测试的一个子测试,竞争句测试满足了潜在筛选测试的统计和实用性标准。左耳的切除评分为4分(满分10分),灵敏度为89%,特异性为61%。需要进一步的研究来测试竞争句子测试和其他工具,在更大的儿童样本上测试它们作为APD筛查测试的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Screening Instruments for Auditory Processing Disorder (APD) in a Sample of Referred Children
There is increased recognition of auditory processing disorder (APD) as a significant disorder, predominantly of childhood, which typically has broad effects on the development of communication and educational and social skills. Accordingly, reconsideration of screening children for APD is warranted, either in whole populations or high risk groups. This study investigated the sensitivity and specificity of four instruments, audiological and non audiological, against diagnostic outcome in a clinical sample of 23 children, aged 7-10 years, referred for assessment of their auditory processing abilities. One instrument, the Competing Sentences Test, which is a subtest of the SCAN-A, met the study's statistical and practicality criteria for a potential screening test. A cut off score for the left ear of four out of 10 gave a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 61%. Further research is needed to test the Competing Sentences Test, and other instruments, on larger samples of children for their potential as screening tests for APD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rehabilitation Efforts and Stress in Parents of Children With Cochlear Implants Communicating with Australian Deaf People about Communication Technology Student Audiologists' Impressions of a Simulation Training Program An Independent Review of Neuromonics Tinnitus Treatment Controlled Clinical Trials A Pilot Investigation into the Provision of Hearing Services Using Tele-audiology to Remote Areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1