给予者还是接受者?金融科技与传统金融业的回报与波动溢出效应

Yuxuan Chen, J. Chiu, Hui-Young Chung
{"title":"给予者还是接受者?金融科技与传统金融业的回报与波动溢出效应","authors":"Yuxuan Chen, J. Chiu, Hui-Young Chung","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3919636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate the return and volatility spillovers between a Fintech ETF and the ETFs of the traditional financial industry with an empirical network model. We find that the traditional financial ETFs are still the main givers, and the Fintech ETF is the net receiver. The Fintech ETF does not lead to greater volatility and financial instability in most of the traditional financial sectors. The information transmission between these ETFs is high, especially during the period of US-China trade friction. Our results provide a full understanding of the effect of changes in information transmission between Fintech and the traditional financial industry.","PeriodicalId":331807,"journal":{"name":"Banking & Insurance eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Givers or Receivers? Return and volatility spillovers between Fintech and the Traditional Financial Industry\",\"authors\":\"Yuxuan Chen, J. Chiu, Hui-Young Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3919636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigate the return and volatility spillovers between a Fintech ETF and the ETFs of the traditional financial industry with an empirical network model. We find that the traditional financial ETFs are still the main givers, and the Fintech ETF is the net receiver. The Fintech ETF does not lead to greater volatility and financial instability in most of the traditional financial sectors. The information transmission between these ETFs is high, especially during the period of US-China trade friction. Our results provide a full understanding of the effect of changes in information transmission between Fintech and the traditional financial industry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Banking & Insurance eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Banking & Insurance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3919636\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banking & Insurance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3919636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

本文运用实证网络模型研究了金融科技ETF与传统金融行业ETF之间的收益和波动溢出效应。我们发现,传统的金融ETF仍然是主要的给予者,金融科技ETF是净接受者。金融科技ETF不会导致大多数传统金融领域的更大波动和金融不稳定。这些etf之间的信息传递较高,特别是在中美贸易摩擦期间。我们的研究结果充分理解了金融科技与传统金融业之间信息传递变化的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Givers or Receivers? Return and volatility spillovers between Fintech and the Traditional Financial Industry
We investigate the return and volatility spillovers between a Fintech ETF and the ETFs of the traditional financial industry with an empirical network model. We find that the traditional financial ETFs are still the main givers, and the Fintech ETF is the net receiver. The Fintech ETF does not lead to greater volatility and financial instability in most of the traditional financial sectors. The information transmission between these ETFs is high, especially during the period of US-China trade friction. Our results provide a full understanding of the effect of changes in information transmission between Fintech and the traditional financial industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Wealth Management Products, Banking Competition, and Stability: Evidence from China Mirco-level Prediction of Outstanding Claim Counts using Neural Networks Lending Competition, Regulation and Non-Traditional Mortgages PE for the Public: The Rise of SPACs Lawmaking Without Law: How Overreliance on Economics Fails Financial Regulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1