通过规范和控制知识密集型过程来限制多样性

I. Bider, A. Jalali
{"title":"通过规范和控制知识密集型过程来限制多样性","authors":"I. Bider, A. Jalali","doi":"10.1109/EDOCW.2016.7584366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies the effects of applying process improvement principles to knowledge-intensive processes, which are typical for being supported by Adaptive Case Management systems. The study is being completed by investigating a process of conducting a small-scale research project that results in BS or MS thesis being defended and graded. The research is a mixture of the case study at the department with which both authors are affiliated and reflections on own experience as active participants of the process. The preliminary results show that the improvement principles applied in the project have helped to smoothen the process and improve its outcome in terms of producing defendable theses that satisfy the requirements set by the relevant authority. However, it seems they might not positively affect other outcomes, like the size and quality of research contribution.","PeriodicalId":287808,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 20th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limiting Variety by Standardizing and Controlling Knowledge Intensive Processes\",\"authors\":\"I. Bider, A. Jalali\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDOCW.2016.7584366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper studies the effects of applying process improvement principles to knowledge-intensive processes, which are typical for being supported by Adaptive Case Management systems. The study is being completed by investigating a process of conducting a small-scale research project that results in BS or MS thesis being defended and graded. The research is a mixture of the case study at the department with which both authors are affiliated and reflections on own experience as active participants of the process. The preliminary results show that the improvement principles applied in the project have helped to smoothen the process and improve its outcome in terms of producing defendable theses that satisfy the requirements set by the relevant authority. However, it seems they might not positively affect other outcomes, like the size and quality of research contribution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":287808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE 20th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW)\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE 20th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2016.7584366\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 20th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2016.7584366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文研究了将过程改进原则应用于知识密集型过程的效果,这些过程通常由自适应案例管理系统支持。该研究是通过调查进行小规模研究项目的过程来完成的,结果是学士或硕士论文被辩护和评分。这项研究结合了两位作者所在部门的案例研究,以及作为该过程积极参与者的自身经验的反思。初步结果表明,在项目中应用的改进原则有助于使过程更加顺利,并在产生符合有关当局规定的可辩护的论文方面改善了其结果。然而,它们似乎不会对其他结果产生积极影响,比如研究贡献的规模和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Limiting Variety by Standardizing and Controlling Knowledge Intensive Processes
This paper studies the effects of applying process improvement principles to knowledge-intensive processes, which are typical for being supported by Adaptive Case Management systems. The study is being completed by investigating a process of conducting a small-scale research project that results in BS or MS thesis being defended and graded. The research is a mixture of the case study at the department with which both authors are affiliated and reflections on own experience as active participants of the process. The preliminary results show that the improvement principles applied in the project have helped to smoothen the process and improve its outcome in terms of producing defendable theses that satisfy the requirements set by the relevant authority. However, it seems they might not positively affect other outcomes, like the size and quality of research contribution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Artifact-Centric Business Process Execution Platform Untangling EA's Long Path of Becoming a Partner for Business Transformation: The Case of Swiss Federal Railways Social Set Visualizer (SoSeVi) II: Interactive Computational Set Analysis of Big Social Data Automated Change Planning for Differential Update IT Systems with State Constraint Message from the CeSCop/ProMoS 2016 Workshop Chairs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1