国际航空法哲学

Sivaramapanicker Sreejith, Lakshmi Srinivasan, Vistasp Irani
{"title":"国际航空法哲学","authors":"Sivaramapanicker Sreejith, Lakshmi Srinivasan, Vistasp Irani","doi":"10.18060/27369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“International Air Law” has been justifiably arrested in a straight-jacketed approach centred on the classical doctrines of state sovereignty and sources, which is in addition to a limiting classicism in IAL’s discourses, methods, and meanings. This Article problematizes the said classicism on account of it distancing, and often dissociating, IAL from the global realities in civil aviation. It proposes an alternative approach to read IAL including rechristening it as “International Aviation Law,”, a new epistemological and disciplinary category, which has a modernist approach, and which stays close to the reality of functions in civil aviation. In making a case for IAvL, the Article primarily draws on many renewalist and radical thinking in international law and elsewhere mindful of the prevailing global and economic realities. Motivated by the same, the Article lets orthodoxies to fall for making ground for an epistemological revolution in the regulation of civil aviation. The Article organizes its critique and construction under four major heads: Sovereignty, Sources, Subjects, and Meanings. \n ","PeriodicalId":442356,"journal":{"name":"Indiana International & Comparative Law Review","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Philosophy of International Aviation Law\",\"authors\":\"Sivaramapanicker Sreejith, Lakshmi Srinivasan, Vistasp Irani\",\"doi\":\"10.18060/27369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“International Air Law” has been justifiably arrested in a straight-jacketed approach centred on the classical doctrines of state sovereignty and sources, which is in addition to a limiting classicism in IAL’s discourses, methods, and meanings. This Article problematizes the said classicism on account of it distancing, and often dissociating, IAL from the global realities in civil aviation. It proposes an alternative approach to read IAL including rechristening it as “International Aviation Law,”, a new epistemological and disciplinary category, which has a modernist approach, and which stays close to the reality of functions in civil aviation. In making a case for IAvL, the Article primarily draws on many renewalist and radical thinking in international law and elsewhere mindful of the prevailing global and economic realities. Motivated by the same, the Article lets orthodoxies to fall for making ground for an epistemological revolution in the regulation of civil aviation. The Article organizes its critique and construction under four major heads: Sovereignty, Sources, Subjects, and Meanings. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":442356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indiana International & Comparative Law Review\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indiana International & Comparative Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18060/27369\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana International & Comparative Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/27369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“国际航空法”被合理地限制在以国家主权和来源的古典学说为中心的刻板方法中,这是对国际航空法的话语,方法和意义的限制古典主义的补充。本文对上述古典主义提出了质疑,因为它与民航的全球现实脱节。它提出了另一种解读国际航空法的方法,包括将其重新命名为“国际航空法”,这是一种新的认识论和学科类别,具有现代主义的方法,并且接近民用航空功能的现实。该条在为国际法辩护时,主要借鉴了国际法和其他地方的许多更新主义和激进思想,注意到当前的全球和经济现实。出于同样的动机,文章放弃了正统观念,为民航监管的认识论革命奠定了基础。文章从主权、来源、主体、意义四个方面来组织其批判与建构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Philosophy of International Aviation Law
“International Air Law” has been justifiably arrested in a straight-jacketed approach centred on the classical doctrines of state sovereignty and sources, which is in addition to a limiting classicism in IAL’s discourses, methods, and meanings. This Article problematizes the said classicism on account of it distancing, and often dissociating, IAL from the global realities in civil aviation. It proposes an alternative approach to read IAL including rechristening it as “International Aviation Law,”, a new epistemological and disciplinary category, which has a modernist approach, and which stays close to the reality of functions in civil aviation. In making a case for IAvL, the Article primarily draws on many renewalist and radical thinking in international law and elsewhere mindful of the prevailing global and economic realities. Motivated by the same, the Article lets orthodoxies to fall for making ground for an epistemological revolution in the regulation of civil aviation. The Article organizes its critique and construction under four major heads: Sovereignty, Sources, Subjects, and Meanings.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Educational Prerogative or Public Health Program: A Comparative Approach to Sex Education Policies in the United States and Spain Is Justice Possible in Russian Courts? A Case Study of Housing Disputes Indigenous Arts and Crafts and Copyright Law: A Comparative Analysis of the United States and Australian Legal Frameworks Conceptualizing Multi-Level Legal Systems to Address Global Food Security: The Hard Law-Soft Law Interface of International Law and Corporate Social Responsibility Achieving Paris Agreement Goals by Addressing Cropland Fundamentals: Real Property Recording and Landlord-Tenant Lease Length
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1