{"title":"提前执行取代运行时:神经网络预测期权波动","authors":"M. Malliaris, L. Salchenberger","doi":"10.1109/CAIA.1994.323630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compares three methods of estimating the volatility of daily S&P 100 Index stock market options. The implied volatility, calculated via the Black-Scholes model, is currently the most popular method of estimating volatility and is used by traders in the pricing of options. Historical volatility has been used to predict the implied volatility, but the estimates are poor predictors. A neural network for predicting volatility is shown to be far superior to the historical method.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":297396,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do-ahead replaces run-time: a neural network forecasts options volatility\",\"authors\":\"M. Malliaris, L. Salchenberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CAIA.1994.323630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Compares three methods of estimating the volatility of daily S&P 100 Index stock market options. The implied volatility, calculated via the Black-Scholes model, is currently the most popular method of estimating volatility and is used by traders in the pricing of options. Historical volatility has been used to predict the implied volatility, but the estimates are poor predictors. A neural network for predicting volatility is shown to be far superior to the historical method.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":297396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CAIA.1994.323630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CAIA.1994.323630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do-ahead replaces run-time: a neural network forecasts options volatility
Compares three methods of estimating the volatility of daily S&P 100 Index stock market options. The implied volatility, calculated via the Black-Scholes model, is currently the most popular method of estimating volatility and is used by traders in the pricing of options. Historical volatility has been used to predict the implied volatility, but the estimates are poor predictors. A neural network for predicting volatility is shown to be far superior to the historical method.<>