重新设想组织级军备测试

Stephen T. Sargeant, A. Wells
{"title":"重新设想组织级军备测试","authors":"Stephen T. Sargeant, A. Wells","doi":"10.1109/AUTOTESTCON47462.2022.9984781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organizational Level (O-Level) Maintenance personnel face tremendous pressure to maintain the mission readiness of aircraft and weapons systems in some of the most inhospitable conditions imaginable. Whether deployed on an aircraft carrier in the middle of the Atlantic, or on a remote airbase in Alaska, maintainers are only as effective as their training and test equipment. This can be especially challenging for the armament maintainer as new weapons systems and munitions are developed and fielded, and commonly utilized alongside legacy munitions. Test equipment must not only address the legacy test requirements, but must include new capabilities; this results in the proliferation of multiple types and generations of test equipment that impacts test execution performance, training, logistics and ultimately aircraft mission readiness. O-Level armament maintenance includes scheduled and unscheduled activities; scheduled test occurs after installation or scheduled maintenance, and unscheduled test occurs in support of fault analysis and troubleshooting. For this reason, the USAF has employed two versions of O-Level testers for most fighter aircraft. The first is a simple reliability tester most often known as the Armament Circuit Preload Test Set (ACPTS), and the second is an advanced tester (COLT, SST, 198, etc.) used for functional checkouts. Furthermore, O-Level armament support for the F-16 may require up to five different testers (5060, SST, FIST, MBFI and Viper), with each tester being employed for a different function or mission. Clearly this poses significant training and proficiency challenges for the maintainer, but also impacts logistics as any deployment must also include each of these test sets along with associated cable assemblies. This paper will explore the need for a universal O-Level armament test set that combines all O-Level armament tests into one test set, and identify the reliability and functional test requirements that must be addressed to support legacy as well as new and emerging aircraft armament and weapons.","PeriodicalId":298798,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE AUTOTESTCON","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizational Level Armament Test Reimagined\",\"authors\":\"Stephen T. Sargeant, A. Wells\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AUTOTESTCON47462.2022.9984781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Organizational Level (O-Level) Maintenance personnel face tremendous pressure to maintain the mission readiness of aircraft and weapons systems in some of the most inhospitable conditions imaginable. Whether deployed on an aircraft carrier in the middle of the Atlantic, or on a remote airbase in Alaska, maintainers are only as effective as their training and test equipment. This can be especially challenging for the armament maintainer as new weapons systems and munitions are developed and fielded, and commonly utilized alongside legacy munitions. Test equipment must not only address the legacy test requirements, but must include new capabilities; this results in the proliferation of multiple types and generations of test equipment that impacts test execution performance, training, logistics and ultimately aircraft mission readiness. O-Level armament maintenance includes scheduled and unscheduled activities; scheduled test occurs after installation or scheduled maintenance, and unscheduled test occurs in support of fault analysis and troubleshooting. For this reason, the USAF has employed two versions of O-Level testers for most fighter aircraft. The first is a simple reliability tester most often known as the Armament Circuit Preload Test Set (ACPTS), and the second is an advanced tester (COLT, SST, 198, etc.) used for functional checkouts. Furthermore, O-Level armament support for the F-16 may require up to five different testers (5060, SST, FIST, MBFI and Viper), with each tester being employed for a different function or mission. Clearly this poses significant training and proficiency challenges for the maintainer, but also impacts logistics as any deployment must also include each of these test sets along with associated cable assemblies. This paper will explore the need for a universal O-Level armament test set that combines all O-Level armament tests into one test set, and identify the reliability and functional test requirements that must be addressed to support legacy as well as new and emerging aircraft armament and weapons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE AUTOTESTCON\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE AUTOTESTCON\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTOTESTCON47462.2022.9984781\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE AUTOTESTCON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTOTESTCON47462.2022.9984781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

组织级(o级)维护人员面临着巨大的压力,要在一些可以想象的最恶劣的条件下保持飞机和武器系统的任务准备状态。无论是部署在大西洋中部的航空母舰上,还是部署在阿拉斯加偏远的空军基地上,维护人员的有效性取决于他们的训练和测试设备。这对于武器维护人员来说尤其具有挑战性,因为新的武器系统和弹药正在开发和部署,并且通常与传统弹药一起使用。测试设备不仅要满足传统的测试需求,还必须包含新的功能;这导致了多种类型和几代测试设备的激增,影响了测试执行性能、训练、后勤和最终的飞机任务准备。o级军备维修包括计划内和计划外活动;计划测试在安装或定期维护之后进行,计划外测试在支持故障分析和故障排除时进行。出于这个原因,美国空军已经为大多数战斗机使用了两个版本的o级测试器。第一个是一个简单的可靠性测试仪,通常被称为军备电路预载测试集(ACPTS),第二个是一个先进的测试仪(COLT, SST, 198等),用于功能检查。此外,F-16的o级武器支持可能需要多达五个不同的测试器(5060,SST, FIST, MBFI和Viper),每个测试器被用于不同的功能或任务。显然,这对维护人员的培训和熟练程度提出了重大挑战,但也影响了后勤工作,因为任何部署都必须包括这些测试集以及相关的电缆组件。本文将探讨将所有o级武器测试合并为一个测试集的通用o级武器测试集的需求,并确定必须解决的可靠性和功能测试需求,以支持传统以及新型和新兴的飞机武器和武器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Organizational Level Armament Test Reimagined
Organizational Level (O-Level) Maintenance personnel face tremendous pressure to maintain the mission readiness of aircraft and weapons systems in some of the most inhospitable conditions imaginable. Whether deployed on an aircraft carrier in the middle of the Atlantic, or on a remote airbase in Alaska, maintainers are only as effective as their training and test equipment. This can be especially challenging for the armament maintainer as new weapons systems and munitions are developed and fielded, and commonly utilized alongside legacy munitions. Test equipment must not only address the legacy test requirements, but must include new capabilities; this results in the proliferation of multiple types and generations of test equipment that impacts test execution performance, training, logistics and ultimately aircraft mission readiness. O-Level armament maintenance includes scheduled and unscheduled activities; scheduled test occurs after installation or scheduled maintenance, and unscheduled test occurs in support of fault analysis and troubleshooting. For this reason, the USAF has employed two versions of O-Level testers for most fighter aircraft. The first is a simple reliability tester most often known as the Armament Circuit Preload Test Set (ACPTS), and the second is an advanced tester (COLT, SST, 198, etc.) used for functional checkouts. Furthermore, O-Level armament support for the F-16 may require up to five different testers (5060, SST, FIST, MBFI and Viper), with each tester being employed for a different function or mission. Clearly this poses significant training and proficiency challenges for the maintainer, but also impacts logistics as any deployment must also include each of these test sets along with associated cable assemblies. This paper will explore the need for a universal O-Level armament test set that combines all O-Level armament tests into one test set, and identify the reliability and functional test requirements that must be addressed to support legacy as well as new and emerging aircraft armament and weapons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Next Generation Streaming Data Test System for High Bandwidth Applications Information Assurance in modern ATE Towards Continuous Cyber Testing with Reinforcement Learning for Whole Campaign Emulation The Dichotomy of Commonality versus Form Factor for O-level ATE Securing ATE Using the DoD's Risk Management Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1