南非公共部门工作场所雇佣关系、雇佣关系满意度与心理契约的关系

David Isaac Ntimba, K. Lessing, I. Swarts
{"title":"南非公共部门工作场所雇佣关系、雇佣关系满意度与心理契约的关系","authors":"David Isaac Ntimba, K. Lessing, I. Swarts","doi":"10.25159/2664-3731/8129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" \nThe Global Competitiveness Report of 2014 rated the South African labour market as the lowest (137th position) out of the 137 countries measured with regard to employment relationship, which included cooperation in labour–employer relations. In the 2018 report, 148 countries were rated, and again South Africa was placed in the last position. The antagonism that continues to characterise employment relationship in the South African workplace in general and the public sector in particular has impacted equally negatively on employment relations satisfaction and the fulfilment of the psychological contract. This article explores the interrelationship between the three variables (employment relationship, employment relations satisfaction and psychological contract), and the effect that each has on workplace relations in general. The study adopted a quantitative research approach and used a survey design. A proportionate stratified random sampling method was used to determine the sample size, and the data were collected through a structured questionnaire. A scientific analysis of the data results revealed that psychological contract was a mediator and that employment relationship was a predictor that had a direct influence on both psychological contract and employment relations satisfaction. Based on the mediation results, the researchers reached the conclusion that employment relationship and employment relations satisfaction were both influenced by psychological contract. Therefore they recommend that, to improve relationships in the South African workplace, management and employees should invest more effort in encouraging a positive employment relationship and the fulfilment of psychological contract obligations.","PeriodicalId":143111,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Employee Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship between Employment Relationship, Employment Relations Satisfaction and Psychological Contracts in the South African Public Sector Workplace\",\"authors\":\"David Isaac Ntimba, K. Lessing, I. Swarts\",\"doi\":\"10.25159/2664-3731/8129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\" \\nThe Global Competitiveness Report of 2014 rated the South African labour market as the lowest (137th position) out of the 137 countries measured with regard to employment relationship, which included cooperation in labour–employer relations. In the 2018 report, 148 countries were rated, and again South Africa was placed in the last position. The antagonism that continues to characterise employment relationship in the South African workplace in general and the public sector in particular has impacted equally negatively on employment relations satisfaction and the fulfilment of the psychological contract. This article explores the interrelationship between the three variables (employment relationship, employment relations satisfaction and psychological contract), and the effect that each has on workplace relations in general. The study adopted a quantitative research approach and used a survey design. A proportionate stratified random sampling method was used to determine the sample size, and the data were collected through a structured questionnaire. A scientific analysis of the data results revealed that psychological contract was a mediator and that employment relationship was a predictor that had a direct influence on both psychological contract and employment relations satisfaction. Based on the mediation results, the researchers reached the conclusion that employment relationship and employment relations satisfaction were both influenced by psychological contract. Therefore they recommend that, to improve relationships in the South African workplace, management and employees should invest more effort in encouraging a positive employment relationship and the fulfilment of psychological contract obligations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Employee Relations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Employee Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25159/2664-3731/8129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Employee Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2664-3731/8129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《2014年全球竞争力报告》将南非劳动力市场在就业关系(包括劳资关系方面的合作)方面评为137个国家中最低(第137位)。在2018年的报告中,对148个国家进行了排名,南非再次排在最后。在整个南非工作场所,特别是公共部门的就业关系中,对抗仍然是其特点,这同样对就业关系的满意度和心理契约的履行产生了消极影响。本文探讨了三个变量(雇佣关系、雇佣关系满意度和心理契约)之间的相互关系,以及它们对一般职场关系的影响。本研究采用定量研究方法和调查设计。采用比例分层随机抽样法确定样本量,采用结构化问卷收集数据。对数据结果的科学分析表明,心理契约是中介变量,雇佣关系是预测因子,对心理契约和雇佣关系满意度均有直接影响。基于中介结果,研究者得出雇佣关系和雇佣关系满意度都受到心理契约的影响。因此,他们建议,为了改善南非工作场所的关系,管理层和雇员应该在鼓励积极的雇佣关系和履行心理契约义务方面投入更多的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Relationship between Employment Relationship, Employment Relations Satisfaction and Psychological Contracts in the South African Public Sector Workplace
  The Global Competitiveness Report of 2014 rated the South African labour market as the lowest (137th position) out of the 137 countries measured with regard to employment relationship, which included cooperation in labour–employer relations. In the 2018 report, 148 countries were rated, and again South Africa was placed in the last position. The antagonism that continues to characterise employment relationship in the South African workplace in general and the public sector in particular has impacted equally negatively on employment relations satisfaction and the fulfilment of the psychological contract. This article explores the interrelationship between the three variables (employment relationship, employment relations satisfaction and psychological contract), and the effect that each has on workplace relations in general. The study adopted a quantitative research approach and used a survey design. A proportionate stratified random sampling method was used to determine the sample size, and the data were collected through a structured questionnaire. A scientific analysis of the data results revealed that psychological contract was a mediator and that employment relationship was a predictor that had a direct influence on both psychological contract and employment relations satisfaction. Based on the mediation results, the researchers reached the conclusion that employment relationship and employment relations satisfaction were both influenced by psychological contract. Therefore they recommend that, to improve relationships in the South African workplace, management and employees should invest more effort in encouraging a positive employment relationship and the fulfilment of psychological contract obligations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
South African Industry and Geographic Dynamics Perspective on the Link Between Employee Diversity Attributes and Employee Productivity Investigating the Prevalence of Gender Stereotypes in a South African Mine Job Satisfaction in South Africa: The Quest for Job Quality Psychological Contracts and Employee Voice: Does Breach Matter? The Rise of Public Sector Employee Strikes in Africa: Should We Be worried?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1