哮喘患儿电子肺活量计与小儿莱特峰值流量计的比较及其与临床症状的关系。

S Schurman, L T Charamonte
{"title":"哮喘患儿电子肺活量计与小儿莱特峰值流量计的比较及其与临床症状的关系。","authors":"S Schurman,&nbsp;L T Charamonte","doi":"10.3109/02770907609104165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the correlations between the Wright Peak Flow Meter and an Electronic Spirometer with clinical symptomatology in chronic asthmatic chidlren, objective measurements of Peak Flow (PF) on both electronic (Vanguard Electric Spirometer) and mechanical (Wright Peak Flow Meter) Spirometers, Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), Forced, Expiratory Volune 1/2 second (FEV 0.5), Forced Expiratory Volume 1/2 per cent (FEV 0.5%), AND Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate (MMEFR) were obtained. Subjective observations of clinical wheezing were recorded immediately before each flow rate by trained nurses. PF determinations of both the mechanical and electronic spirometers were in close agreement. PF on the electronic spirometer correlated best with clinical wheezing in this study. The MMEFR calculated from the electronically produced graphys had the nex best coefficient of corelation. These were followed by the PF measured mechanically on the WPFM.</p>","PeriodicalId":76644,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of asthma research","volume":"13 3","pages":"129-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/02770907609104165","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of an electronic spirometer with a pediatric Wright Peak Flow Meter and their relationship to clinical symptomatology in asthmatic children.\",\"authors\":\"S Schurman,&nbsp;L T Charamonte\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/02770907609104165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To evaluate the correlations between the Wright Peak Flow Meter and an Electronic Spirometer with clinical symptomatology in chronic asthmatic chidlren, objective measurements of Peak Flow (PF) on both electronic (Vanguard Electric Spirometer) and mechanical (Wright Peak Flow Meter) Spirometers, Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), Forced, Expiratory Volune 1/2 second (FEV 0.5), Forced Expiratory Volume 1/2 per cent (FEV 0.5%), AND Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate (MMEFR) were obtained. Subjective observations of clinical wheezing were recorded immediately before each flow rate by trained nurses. PF determinations of both the mechanical and electronic spirometers were in close agreement. PF on the electronic spirometer correlated best with clinical wheezing in this study. The MMEFR calculated from the electronically produced graphys had the nex best coefficient of corelation. These were followed by the PF measured mechanically on the WPFM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76644,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of asthma research\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"129-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1976-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/02770907609104165\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of asthma research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/02770907609104165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of asthma research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/02770907609104165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

为了评价Wright峰值流量仪和电子肺活量仪与慢性哮喘患儿临床症状的相关性,我们对电子(Vanguard电动肺活量仪)和机械(Wright峰值流量仪)肺活量仪、用力肺活量(FVC)、用力呼气容积1/2秒(FEV 0.5)、用力呼气容积1/2 % (FEV 0.5%)和最大呼气中流量(MMEFR)进行客观测量。由训练有素的护士在每次心跳前记录临床喘息的主观观察结果。机械肺活量计和电子肺活量计的测定结果一致。电子肺活计上的肺活量与临床喘息的相关性最好。由电子生成的图形计算的MMEFR具有次佳的相关系数。然后在WPFM上机械测量PF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of an electronic spirometer with a pediatric Wright Peak Flow Meter and their relationship to clinical symptomatology in asthmatic children.

To evaluate the correlations between the Wright Peak Flow Meter and an Electronic Spirometer with clinical symptomatology in chronic asthmatic chidlren, objective measurements of Peak Flow (PF) on both electronic (Vanguard Electric Spirometer) and mechanical (Wright Peak Flow Meter) Spirometers, Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), Forced, Expiratory Volune 1/2 second (FEV 0.5), Forced Expiratory Volume 1/2 per cent (FEV 0.5%), AND Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate (MMEFR) were obtained. Subjective observations of clinical wheezing were recorded immediately before each flow rate by trained nurses. PF determinations of both the mechanical and electronic spirometers were in close agreement. PF on the electronic spirometer correlated best with clinical wheezing in this study. The MMEFR calculated from the electronically produced graphys had the nex best coefficient of corelation. These were followed by the PF measured mechanically on the WPFM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of pulmonary monitor and Wright peak flow meter. A few clinical statistical observations on the use of Solganal-B-Oleosum n bronchial asthma. The historical and cultural spectra of homosexuality and their relationship to the fear of being a lesbian. A new method of administering aqueous epinephrine: the EpiPen, an automatic syringe. Effect of Triiodothyronine on Bronchial Asthma. III.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1