{"title":"质疑结局效应:结局本身并不会对体验评估产生不成比例的影响","authors":"Stephanie M. Tully, T. Meyvis","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2498663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present research re-examines one of the most basic findings regarding the evaluation of hedonic experiences: the end effect. The end effect suggests that people’s retrospective evaluations of an experience are disproportionately influenced by the final moments of the experience. The findings in this paper indicate that endings are not inherently over-weighted in retrospective evaluations. That is, episodes do not disproportionately affect the evaluation of an experience simply because they occur at the end. We replicate prior demonstrations of the end effect, but provide additional evidence implicating other processes as driving factors of those findings.","PeriodicalId":268180,"journal":{"name":"ACR North American Advances","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Questioning the End Effect: Endings Do Not Inherently Have a Disproportionate Impact on Evaluations of Experiences\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie M. Tully, T. Meyvis\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2498663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present research re-examines one of the most basic findings regarding the evaluation of hedonic experiences: the end effect. The end effect suggests that people’s retrospective evaluations of an experience are disproportionately influenced by the final moments of the experience. The findings in this paper indicate that endings are not inherently over-weighted in retrospective evaluations. That is, episodes do not disproportionately affect the evaluation of an experience simply because they occur at the end. We replicate prior demonstrations of the end effect, but provide additional evidence implicating other processes as driving factors of those findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":268180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACR North American Advances\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACR North American Advances\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2498663\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACR North American Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2498663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Questioning the End Effect: Endings Do Not Inherently Have a Disproportionate Impact on Evaluations of Experiences
The present research re-examines one of the most basic findings regarding the evaluation of hedonic experiences: the end effect. The end effect suggests that people’s retrospective evaluations of an experience are disproportionately influenced by the final moments of the experience. The findings in this paper indicate that endings are not inherently over-weighted in retrospective evaluations. That is, episodes do not disproportionately affect the evaluation of an experience simply because they occur at the end. We replicate prior demonstrations of the end effect, but provide additional evidence implicating other processes as driving factors of those findings.