对限价单市场流动性难题中零收益的再思考

P. Mazza
{"title":"对限价单市场流动性难题中零收益的再思考","authors":"P. Mazza","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2212101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The frequency of zero returns has often been used as a proxy for illiquidity in the literature. Based on Euronext intraday data, we show that zero returns are significantly related to liquidity instead. We conduct an event study and run conditional logit regressions using spread, depth, dispersion and slope measures as liquidity variables. Although we find that zero returns are associated with less informed trading as previously outlined in the literature, this does not necessarily lead to higher illiquidity.","PeriodicalId":341097,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Europe (Developed Markets) (Topic)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking Zero Returns in the Liquidity Puzzle of a Limit Order Market\",\"authors\":\"P. Mazza\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2212101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The frequency of zero returns has often been used as a proxy for illiquidity in the literature. Based on Euronext intraday data, we show that zero returns are significantly related to liquidity instead. We conduct an event study and run conditional logit regressions using spread, depth, dispersion and slope measures as liquidity variables. Although we find that zero returns are associated with less informed trading as previously outlined in the literature, this does not necessarily lead to higher illiquidity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Europe (Developed Markets) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Europe (Developed Markets) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2212101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Europe (Developed Markets) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2212101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在文献中,零回报的频率经常被用作非流动性的代表。基于Euronext盘中数据,我们发现零回报与流动性显著相关。我们进行了一个事件研究,并运行条件logit回归使用蔓延,深度,分散和斜率措施作为流动性变量。虽然我们发现零回报与之前文献中概述的不知情交易有关,但这并不一定导致更高的非流动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rethinking Zero Returns in the Liquidity Puzzle of a Limit Order Market
The frequency of zero returns has often been used as a proxy for illiquidity in the literature. Based on Euronext intraday data, we show that zero returns are significantly related to liquidity instead. We conduct an event study and run conditional logit regressions using spread, depth, dispersion and slope measures as liquidity variables. Although we find that zero returns are associated with less informed trading as previously outlined in the literature, this does not necessarily lead to higher illiquidity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Revisiting Index Methodology for Thinly Traded Stock Market. Case: Helsinki Stock Exchange Carbon Home Bias of European Investors Simulating Stress in the UK Corporate Bond Market: Investor Behaviour and Asset Fire-Sales It Only Takes a Few Moments to Hedge Financial Markets Behaviour Around ECB Announcements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1