根据土耳其建筑抗震规范:TBEC-2007与TBEC-2018设计多层钢结构建筑

İbrahim Emrah Katmer, Tuğçe Sevil Yaman
{"title":"根据土耳其建筑抗震规范:TBEC-2007与TBEC-2018设计多层钢结构建筑","authors":"İbrahim Emrah Katmer, Tuğçe Sevil Yaman","doi":"10.31462/jseam.2023.02195223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People have built structures to survive and to meet their shelter needs. While buildings had progressed horizontally at first, the increase in population and shrinkage of spaces over time led the construction industry to build multi-story buildings. In the research, the Turkish Building Earthquake Code 2007 (TBEC-2007) and the Turkish Building Earthquake Code 2018 (TBEC-2018) were extensively examined and an 8-story steel business center building having high ductility levels in both directions and consisting of concentrically braced steel frames was designed according to the two earthquake codes. The Equivalent Static Method was utilized while designing according to the codes. For structural elements’ dimensioning, the Regulation on Design, Calculation, and Construction Principles of Steel Structures principles were followed and the Load and Resistance Factor Design Method was utilized. After performing the analyses of the building according to both earthquake codes, the effects of the code differences on the system periods, earthquake loads, lateral displacements, the story drifts, second-order effects, A1 type torsional irregularities, B2 type stiffness irregularities, and dimensioning of the elements were evaluated in detail. It was observed that in TBEC-2018 compared to TBEC-2007, the structure’s coordinates are determined more specifically while identifying the earthquake load, more sensitive soil options are presented, separate calculations according to building height are performed, and base shear forces are smaller. Moreover, it was deduced that there was no significant variance between the codes in terms of calculations of building importance coefficient, natural vibration period, story drifts, and irregularities.","PeriodicalId":151121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design of a multi-story steel building according to the Turkish Building Earthquake Codes: TBEC-2007 vs. TBEC-2018\",\"authors\":\"İbrahim Emrah Katmer, Tuğçe Sevil Yaman\",\"doi\":\"10.31462/jseam.2023.02195223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"People have built structures to survive and to meet their shelter needs. While buildings had progressed horizontally at first, the increase in population and shrinkage of spaces over time led the construction industry to build multi-story buildings. In the research, the Turkish Building Earthquake Code 2007 (TBEC-2007) and the Turkish Building Earthquake Code 2018 (TBEC-2018) were extensively examined and an 8-story steel business center building having high ductility levels in both directions and consisting of concentrically braced steel frames was designed according to the two earthquake codes. The Equivalent Static Method was utilized while designing according to the codes. For structural elements’ dimensioning, the Regulation on Design, Calculation, and Construction Principles of Steel Structures principles were followed and the Load and Resistance Factor Design Method was utilized. After performing the analyses of the building according to both earthquake codes, the effects of the code differences on the system periods, earthquake loads, lateral displacements, the story drifts, second-order effects, A1 type torsional irregularities, B2 type stiffness irregularities, and dimensioning of the elements were evaluated in detail. It was observed that in TBEC-2018 compared to TBEC-2007, the structure’s coordinates are determined more specifically while identifying the earthquake load, more sensitive soil options are presented, separate calculations according to building height are performed, and base shear forces are smaller. Moreover, it was deduced that there was no significant variance between the codes in terms of calculations of building importance coefficient, natural vibration period, story drifts, and irregularities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31462/jseam.2023.02195223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31462/jseam.2023.02195223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们建造建筑来生存和满足他们对住所的需求。虽然建筑最初是水平发展的,但随着时间的推移,人口的增加和空间的缩小导致建筑行业建造了多层建筑。在研究中,对2007年土耳其建筑地震规范(tbc -2007)和2018年土耳其建筑地震规范(tbc -2018)进行了广泛的审查,并根据两个地震规范设计了一座8层钢结构商业中心建筑,该建筑在两个方向上都具有高延展性,由同心支撑钢框架组成。在按规范进行设计时,采用了等效静力法。结构单元尺寸的确定遵循《钢结构设计、计算和施工原则规范》,采用荷载和阻力系数设计方法。根据两种地震规范对建筑进行分析后,详细评估了规范差异对系统周期、地震荷载、侧向位移、楼层漂移、二阶效应、A1型扭转不规则性、B2型刚度不规则性和构件尺寸的影响。观察发现,与TBEC-2007相比,TBEC-2018在确定地震荷载时更具体地确定了结构坐标,提出了更敏感的土壤选择,根据建筑物高度进行了单独计算,基底剪力更小。两种规范在建筑重要系数计算、自振周期计算、层间漂移计算、不规则度计算等方面均无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Design of a multi-story steel building according to the Turkish Building Earthquake Codes: TBEC-2007 vs. TBEC-2018
People have built structures to survive and to meet their shelter needs. While buildings had progressed horizontally at first, the increase in population and shrinkage of spaces over time led the construction industry to build multi-story buildings. In the research, the Turkish Building Earthquake Code 2007 (TBEC-2007) and the Turkish Building Earthquake Code 2018 (TBEC-2018) were extensively examined and an 8-story steel business center building having high ductility levels in both directions and consisting of concentrically braced steel frames was designed according to the two earthquake codes. The Equivalent Static Method was utilized while designing according to the codes. For structural elements’ dimensioning, the Regulation on Design, Calculation, and Construction Principles of Steel Structures principles were followed and the Load and Resistance Factor Design Method was utilized. After performing the analyses of the building according to both earthquake codes, the effects of the code differences on the system periods, earthquake loads, lateral displacements, the story drifts, second-order effects, A1 type torsional irregularities, B2 type stiffness irregularities, and dimensioning of the elements were evaluated in detail. It was observed that in TBEC-2018 compared to TBEC-2007, the structure’s coordinates are determined more specifically while identifying the earthquake load, more sensitive soil options are presented, separate calculations according to building height are performed, and base shear forces are smaller. Moreover, it was deduced that there was no significant variance between the codes in terms of calculations of building importance coefficient, natural vibration period, story drifts, and irregularities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thermal insulation and sound absorption properties of fibrous layered structures Examination of acoustic properties of polymer-coated nonwoven textile samples Influence of carbon fiber non-crimp fabrics stitching parameters on the out-of-plane permeability in liquid composite molding process Competitive analysis of the Turkish composite industry by using the five forces model: A case study Production and characterization of basalt fiber/pet composites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1