作为狭窄的自由走廊属性的非主导选择

A. Khodykin
{"title":"作为狭窄的自由走廊属性的非主导选择","authors":"A. Khodykin","doi":"10.36906/ksp-2021/32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of freedom as non-domination is analyzed in the context of the theory of the “narrow corridor” by D. Acemoglu and J. Robinson. The article presents the argumentation of researchers of republicanism about the correlation of the concepts of freedom as non-interference and freedom as non-domination. On the basis of the metaphor \"cage of norms\" proposed by Acemoglu and Robinson, the social factors that make the choice dominant are analyzed.","PeriodicalId":237329,"journal":{"name":"IХ Международная научно-практическая конференция","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NON-DOMINANT CHOICE AS AN ATTRIBUTE OF A NARROW CORRIDOR OF FREEDOM\",\"authors\":\"A. Khodykin\",\"doi\":\"10.36906/ksp-2021/32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concept of freedom as non-domination is analyzed in the context of the theory of the “narrow corridor” by D. Acemoglu and J. Robinson. The article presents the argumentation of researchers of republicanism about the correlation of the concepts of freedom as non-interference and freedom as non-domination. On the basis of the metaphor \\\"cage of norms\\\" proposed by Acemoglu and Robinson, the social factors that make the choice dominant are analyzed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IХ Международная научно-практическая конференция\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IХ Международная научно-практическая конференция\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36906/ksp-2021/32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IХ Международная научно-практическая конференция","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36906/ksp-2021/32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在阿西莫格鲁(D. Acemoglu)和罗宾逊(J. Robinson)的“狭窄走廊”理论背景下,对自由即非支配的概念进行了分析。本文介绍了共和主义研究者关于自由作为不干涉和自由作为不支配概念的相关性的论证。在Acemoglu和Robinson提出的“规范笼子”隐喻的基础上,分析了使选择占主导地位的社会因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NON-DOMINANT CHOICE AS AN ATTRIBUTE OF A NARROW CORRIDOR OF FREEDOM
The concept of freedom as non-domination is analyzed in the context of the theory of the “narrow corridor” by D. Acemoglu and J. Robinson. The article presents the argumentation of researchers of republicanism about the correlation of the concepts of freedom as non-interference and freedom as non-domination. On the basis of the metaphor "cage of norms" proposed by Acemoglu and Robinson, the social factors that make the choice dominant are analyzed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE MAIN ISSUES OF ENSURING SPORTS SAFETY IN THE FIELD OF PHYSICAL CULTURE AND SPORTS HOW AND FOR WHAT RUSSIAN YOUTH USES YOUTUBE: EXPERIENCE OF SOCIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF REGIONAL CONSTRUCTION IN THE RSFSR IN THE FIRST HALF OF THE 1920 S. EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE USE OF REACTIVE POWER COMPENSATION IN THE ELECTRICAL NETWORKS OF OIL AND GAS PRODUCING ENTERPRISES ONLINE COURSES FOR STUDENTS INDEPENDENT LEARNING
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1