把P4C带进本科课堂

Ashby Butnor
{"title":"把P4C带进本科课堂","authors":"Ashby Butnor","doi":"10.5840/THINKING2004171/224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"achieved according to the group’s own standards. Finally, the community is engaged collaboratively in inquiry. This is where the philosophical component of our work is perhaps most recognizable. Above and beyond the “facts” of a particular topic (and, in the case of a college course, the assigned reading materials), members of the community develop the skills necessary to take inquiry to a deeper and more intellectually rigorous level. As the community strengthens, there is an expectation that reasons will be given to support views, that evidence will be sought in support of claims, that recognition of ambiguity and the consequent clarification of meaning is necessary, that assumptions and implications will be pursued, and that counter-examples will be envisioned to test the truth of the claims being made. The exercise of these thinking tools, coupled with a responsibility for one’s own thinking and participation in the inquiry, transforms students—too many of whom have internalized the role of passive listener—into active co-inquirers, reflective thinkers, and lifetime learners. Prior to my teaching on the UH Manoa campus, I worked as a teaching assistant in the Philosophy in the Schools Project for two and one half years. During that time, I engaged in philosophical dialogues on a weekly basis with over twenty classes in Hawai’i’s public schools ranging from kindergarten to fifth grade. While the formation of an intellectually safe place and the practice of higher-order thinking skills are of first importance in preparing for philosophical inquiry, “doing” philosophy with children advances far beyond these initial requirements. Although these young students do not engage directly with traditional philosophical theories, their chosen topics and the depth of their insights are far-reaching and rich. It is not uncommon, within the course of the year, for the students to inquire into the nature of reality, space, and time, the existence of God and the role of religion, the definition of hapEverything I know about teaching I learned from P4C.","PeriodicalId":432238,"journal":{"name":"Thinking: The journal of philosophy for children","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bringing P4C Into the Undergraduate Classroom\",\"authors\":\"Ashby Butnor\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/THINKING2004171/224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"achieved according to the group’s own standards. Finally, the community is engaged collaboratively in inquiry. This is where the philosophical component of our work is perhaps most recognizable. Above and beyond the “facts” of a particular topic (and, in the case of a college course, the assigned reading materials), members of the community develop the skills necessary to take inquiry to a deeper and more intellectually rigorous level. As the community strengthens, there is an expectation that reasons will be given to support views, that evidence will be sought in support of claims, that recognition of ambiguity and the consequent clarification of meaning is necessary, that assumptions and implications will be pursued, and that counter-examples will be envisioned to test the truth of the claims being made. The exercise of these thinking tools, coupled with a responsibility for one’s own thinking and participation in the inquiry, transforms students—too many of whom have internalized the role of passive listener—into active co-inquirers, reflective thinkers, and lifetime learners. Prior to my teaching on the UH Manoa campus, I worked as a teaching assistant in the Philosophy in the Schools Project for two and one half years. During that time, I engaged in philosophical dialogues on a weekly basis with over twenty classes in Hawai’i’s public schools ranging from kindergarten to fifth grade. While the formation of an intellectually safe place and the practice of higher-order thinking skills are of first importance in preparing for philosophical inquiry, “doing” philosophy with children advances far beyond these initial requirements. Although these young students do not engage directly with traditional philosophical theories, their chosen topics and the depth of their insights are far-reaching and rich. It is not uncommon, within the course of the year, for the students to inquire into the nature of reality, space, and time, the existence of God and the role of religion, the definition of hapEverything I know about teaching I learned from P4C.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thinking: The journal of philosophy for children\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thinking: The journal of philosophy for children\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/THINKING2004171/224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thinking: The journal of philosophy for children","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/THINKING2004171/224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

按照集团自己的标准完成。最后,社区协作参与调查。这可能是我们工作中哲学成分最明显的地方。在特定主题的“事实”之外(在大学课程的情况下,指定的阅读材料),社区成员发展了将探究推向更深层次和更严格的智力水平所必需的技能。随着社区的加强,人们期望给出支持观点的理由,寻求支持主张的证据,认识到模糊性和随后的意义澄清是必要的,将追求假设和含义,并设想反例来检验所提出主张的真实性。这些思考工具的运用,加上对自己思考和参与探究的责任,将学生——其中太多的人已经内化了被动倾听者的角色——转变为积极的共同探究者、反思者和终身学习者。在我在休斯敦大学马诺阿校区任教之前,我在学校哲学项目中担任助教两年半。在那段时间里,我每周与夏威夷公立学校从幼儿园到五年级的二十多个班级进行哲学对话。虽然在准备哲学探究时,智力安全场所的形成和高阶思维技能的实践是最重要的,但与孩子一起“做”哲学远远超出了这些最初的要求。虽然这些年轻的学生没有直接接触传统的哲学理论,但他们所选择的主题和见解的深度是深远而丰富的。在这一年的课程中,学生们对现实、空间和时间的本质、上帝的存在和宗教的作用、“发生”的定义等问题的探究并不罕见。我所知道的关于教学的一切都是从P4C中学到的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bringing P4C Into the Undergraduate Classroom
achieved according to the group’s own standards. Finally, the community is engaged collaboratively in inquiry. This is where the philosophical component of our work is perhaps most recognizable. Above and beyond the “facts” of a particular topic (and, in the case of a college course, the assigned reading materials), members of the community develop the skills necessary to take inquiry to a deeper and more intellectually rigorous level. As the community strengthens, there is an expectation that reasons will be given to support views, that evidence will be sought in support of claims, that recognition of ambiguity and the consequent clarification of meaning is necessary, that assumptions and implications will be pursued, and that counter-examples will be envisioned to test the truth of the claims being made. The exercise of these thinking tools, coupled with a responsibility for one’s own thinking and participation in the inquiry, transforms students—too many of whom have internalized the role of passive listener—into active co-inquirers, reflective thinkers, and lifetime learners. Prior to my teaching on the UH Manoa campus, I worked as a teaching assistant in the Philosophy in the Schools Project for two and one half years. During that time, I engaged in philosophical dialogues on a weekly basis with over twenty classes in Hawai’i’s public schools ranging from kindergarten to fifth grade. While the formation of an intellectually safe place and the practice of higher-order thinking skills are of first importance in preparing for philosophical inquiry, “doing” philosophy with children advances far beyond these initial requirements. Although these young students do not engage directly with traditional philosophical theories, their chosen topics and the depth of their insights are far-reaching and rich. It is not uncommon, within the course of the year, for the students to inquire into the nature of reality, space, and time, the existence of God and the role of religion, the definition of hapEverything I know about teaching I learned from P4C.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Russian Realities of P4C Beginning Interpretative Inquiry Death in Children’s Construction of the World: A German-Japanese Comparison with Gender Analysis Nurturing Communities of Inquiry in Philippine Schools Thirteen Reasons Why
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1