{"title":"修复过程中细菌对营养物改进剂和浸出除烃反应的比较研究","authors":"E. Ughala, C. Ogugbue, G. Okpokwasili","doi":"10.24940/theijst/2019/v7/i12/st1912-005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Introduction: Hydrocarbon pollution is of global concern because of it deleterious effect on the environment and on biodiversity. This study investigated the percentage of hydrocarbon loss through leaching during remediation and how organic-based nutrients impact leaching and the rate of hydrocarbon degradation. Methods: The investigation involved both microbiological and chemical methods. Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) was monitored using Gas chromatography – Flame ionization detection (GC - FID). Other physicochemical parameters analysed included, total organic carbon, nitrate, phosphate and the soil pH. Bacterial monitoring was based on a culture dependent assessment of both heterotrophic and hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria. The nutrients used as biostimulant were: soy bean waste, poultry droppings, NPK and a combined treatment of all nutrient sources. Results: Initial concentrations of TPH and PAHs in the oil-polluted leachate were 2648.3 mg/l and 6320 mg/l respectively while the baseline TPH concentration in the polluted soil was 48, 501 mg/kg. The baseline pH of 7.6 was optimal for microbial multiplication, however nutrient concentrations of nitrate (1.39 mg/kg) and phosphate (2.16 mg/kg) was low.HUB counts in the contaminated leachate was 8.5 x 10 6 (cfu/ml) while that of the pristine soil was 6.1 x 10 6 (cfu/ml). Approximately 6% of TPH and 6.7% of PAHs was lost through leaching from across all the setups during remediation. Nutrient amendment had no direct or significant (p ≤ 0.05) effect on the rate of hydrocarbon loss via leaching. Treatment C had the fastest rate of hydrocarbon loss (0.0207 d -1 ) while the least rate of TPH removal (0.0144 d 1 ) was observed in the unamended control. Analysis of variance revealed there were significant differences (p = 0.001) in HUB counts between the nutrient amended treatments and the unamended control treatment. Also, HUB counts significantly correlated (p = 0.05 and R = - 0.83) with TPH removal in all the nutrient amended treatments Conclusion: The findings from this study will be useful in designing greener remediation strategies and for predicting loss of hydrocarbons via leaching during remediation.","PeriodicalId":231256,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Science & Technoledge","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of Bacterial Response to Nutrient Amendments and Hydrocarbon Removal through Leaching During Remediation\",\"authors\":\"E. Ughala, C. Ogugbue, G. Okpokwasili\",\"doi\":\"10.24940/theijst/2019/v7/i12/st1912-005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Introduction: Hydrocarbon pollution is of global concern because of it deleterious effect on the environment and on biodiversity. This study investigated the percentage of hydrocarbon loss through leaching during remediation and how organic-based nutrients impact leaching and the rate of hydrocarbon degradation. Methods: The investigation involved both microbiological and chemical methods. Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) was monitored using Gas chromatography – Flame ionization detection (GC - FID). Other physicochemical parameters analysed included, total organic carbon, nitrate, phosphate and the soil pH. Bacterial monitoring was based on a culture dependent assessment of both heterotrophic and hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria. The nutrients used as biostimulant were: soy bean waste, poultry droppings, NPK and a combined treatment of all nutrient sources. Results: Initial concentrations of TPH and PAHs in the oil-polluted leachate were 2648.3 mg/l and 6320 mg/l respectively while the baseline TPH concentration in the polluted soil was 48, 501 mg/kg. The baseline pH of 7.6 was optimal for microbial multiplication, however nutrient concentrations of nitrate (1.39 mg/kg) and phosphate (2.16 mg/kg) was low.HUB counts in the contaminated leachate was 8.5 x 10 6 (cfu/ml) while that of the pristine soil was 6.1 x 10 6 (cfu/ml). Approximately 6% of TPH and 6.7% of PAHs was lost through leaching from across all the setups during remediation. Nutrient amendment had no direct or significant (p ≤ 0.05) effect on the rate of hydrocarbon loss via leaching. Treatment C had the fastest rate of hydrocarbon loss (0.0207 d -1 ) while the least rate of TPH removal (0.0144 d 1 ) was observed in the unamended control. Analysis of variance revealed there were significant differences (p = 0.001) in HUB counts between the nutrient amended treatments and the unamended control treatment. Also, HUB counts significantly correlated (p = 0.05 and R = - 0.83) with TPH removal in all the nutrient amended treatments Conclusion: The findings from this study will be useful in designing greener remediation strategies and for predicting loss of hydrocarbons via leaching during remediation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal of Science & Technoledge\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal of Science & Technoledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24940/theijst/2019/v7/i12/st1912-005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Science & Technoledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24940/theijst/2019/v7/i12/st1912-005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
烃类污染因其对环境和生物多样性的有害影响而受到全球关注。本研究考察了修复过程中烃类通过浸出损失的百分比,以及有机营养物如何影响浸出和烃类降解的速率。方法:采用微生物法和化学法进行调查。采用气相色谱-火焰电离检测法(GC - FID)对总石油烃(TPH)和多环芳烃(PAHs)进行了监测。分析的其他理化参数包括总有机碳、硝酸盐、磷酸盐和土壤ph。细菌监测是基于对异养细菌和利用烃细菌的培养依赖评估。用作生物刺激素的营养物为:大豆废料、家禽粪便、氮磷钾和所有营养源的联合处理。结果:油类污染渗滤液中TPH和PAHs初始浓度分别为2648.3 mg/l和6320 mg/l,污染土壤中TPH基线浓度分别为48、501 mg/kg。基线pH为7.6是微生物繁殖的最佳条件,但硝酸盐(1.39 mg/kg)和磷酸盐(2.16 mg/kg)的营养浓度较低。污染渗滤液中HUB含量为8.5 × 10.6 (cfu/ml),而原始土壤中HUB含量为6.1 × 10.6 (cfu/ml)。在修复过程中,大约6%的TPH和6.7%的多环芳烃通过浸出损失。养分修正对浸出烃类损失率无直接或显著影响(p≤0.05)。处理C的烃类损失率最高(0.0207 d -1),而未处理C的TPH去除率最低(0.0144 d -1)。方差分析显示,营养改良处理与未改良对照处理之间的HUB计数有显著差异(p = 0.001)。此外,在所有营养物处理中,HUB计数与TPH去除显著相关(p = 0.05, R = - 0.83)。结论:本研究的发现将有助于设计更环保的修复策略,并预测修复过程中碳氢化合物的浸出损失。
Comparative Study of Bacterial Response to Nutrient Amendments and Hydrocarbon Removal through Leaching During Remediation
: Introduction: Hydrocarbon pollution is of global concern because of it deleterious effect on the environment and on biodiversity. This study investigated the percentage of hydrocarbon loss through leaching during remediation and how organic-based nutrients impact leaching and the rate of hydrocarbon degradation. Methods: The investigation involved both microbiological and chemical methods. Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) was monitored using Gas chromatography – Flame ionization detection (GC - FID). Other physicochemical parameters analysed included, total organic carbon, nitrate, phosphate and the soil pH. Bacterial monitoring was based on a culture dependent assessment of both heterotrophic and hydrocarbon utilizing bacteria. The nutrients used as biostimulant were: soy bean waste, poultry droppings, NPK and a combined treatment of all nutrient sources. Results: Initial concentrations of TPH and PAHs in the oil-polluted leachate were 2648.3 mg/l and 6320 mg/l respectively while the baseline TPH concentration in the polluted soil was 48, 501 mg/kg. The baseline pH of 7.6 was optimal for microbial multiplication, however nutrient concentrations of nitrate (1.39 mg/kg) and phosphate (2.16 mg/kg) was low.HUB counts in the contaminated leachate was 8.5 x 10 6 (cfu/ml) while that of the pristine soil was 6.1 x 10 6 (cfu/ml). Approximately 6% of TPH and 6.7% of PAHs was lost through leaching from across all the setups during remediation. Nutrient amendment had no direct or significant (p ≤ 0.05) effect on the rate of hydrocarbon loss via leaching. Treatment C had the fastest rate of hydrocarbon loss (0.0207 d -1 ) while the least rate of TPH removal (0.0144 d 1 ) was observed in the unamended control. Analysis of variance revealed there were significant differences (p = 0.001) in HUB counts between the nutrient amended treatments and the unamended control treatment. Also, HUB counts significantly correlated (p = 0.05 and R = - 0.83) with TPH removal in all the nutrient amended treatments Conclusion: The findings from this study will be useful in designing greener remediation strategies and for predicting loss of hydrocarbons via leaching during remediation.