{"title":"奥斯勒床边图书馆:医学生的最新必需品","authors":"I. Macdonald, J. Blacklaws","doi":"10.15273/dmj.vol46no1.9831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over 100 years ago Sir William Osler made a list of ten readings that should be at the bedside of every medical student reflecting Osler’s broad and prolific reading habits. Time has continued to flow since Osler’s reading list was proposed and thus, its place in current day medical education warrants reflection. Fundamental questions in this respect include: do medical students still read in the same capacity as their century-old counterparts? If so, how widely does Osler’s original reading list apply to current medical students? Finally, what works would today’s medical students recommend having at the bedside? Students representing the classes of 2016 to 2020 were surveyed at Dalhousie Medical School, constituting one of the largest student efforts in the literature to date to provide per- spectives on Osler’s bedside reading list as well as consensus towards an updated library.This study highlights the considerable disconnect between Osler’s original bedside list and reading tendencies of current medical students. Dalhousie medical students predominantly read and are influenced largely by works pertaining to the medical field and physicians, as opposed to the broad selections set forth by Osler.Although this may reflect the changing medical field or the immersive nature of current training, it also urges reflection as to the value Osler saw in his original bedside library and whether these lessons may be lost on future generations of physicians.","PeriodicalId":293977,"journal":{"name":"Dalhousie Medical Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Osler’s bedside library: Updated essentials from medical students\",\"authors\":\"I. Macdonald, J. Blacklaws\",\"doi\":\"10.15273/dmj.vol46no1.9831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over 100 years ago Sir William Osler made a list of ten readings that should be at the bedside of every medical student reflecting Osler’s broad and prolific reading habits. Time has continued to flow since Osler’s reading list was proposed and thus, its place in current day medical education warrants reflection. Fundamental questions in this respect include: do medical students still read in the same capacity as their century-old counterparts? If so, how widely does Osler’s original reading list apply to current medical students? Finally, what works would today’s medical students recommend having at the bedside? Students representing the classes of 2016 to 2020 were surveyed at Dalhousie Medical School, constituting one of the largest student efforts in the literature to date to provide per- spectives on Osler’s bedside reading list as well as consensus towards an updated library.This study highlights the considerable disconnect between Osler’s original bedside list and reading tendencies of current medical students. Dalhousie medical students predominantly read and are influenced largely by works pertaining to the medical field and physicians, as opposed to the broad selections set forth by Osler.Although this may reflect the changing medical field or the immersive nature of current training, it also urges reflection as to the value Osler saw in his original bedside library and whether these lessons may be lost on future generations of physicians.\",\"PeriodicalId\":293977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dalhousie Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dalhousie Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15273/dmj.vol46no1.9831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dalhousie Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15273/dmj.vol46no1.9831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
100多年前,威廉·奥斯勒爵士(Sir William Osler)列出了十本应放在每个医学院学生床边的读物,这反映了奥斯勒广泛而多产的阅读习惯。自从奥斯勒的阅读清单被提出以来,时间一直在流逝,因此,它在当今医学教育中的地位值得反思。这方面的基本问题包括:医学院学生的阅读能力和他们的百年前辈一样吗?如果是这样的话,奥斯勒最初的阅读清单在医科学生中适用的范围有多大?最后,今天的医科学生会建议在床边使用什么方法?达尔豪斯医学院(Dalhousie Medical School)对2016年至2020年的学生进行了调查,这是迄今为止最大的学生文献调查之一,旨在提供奥斯勒床边阅读清单的观点,以及对更新图书馆的共识。这项研究突出了奥斯勒最初的床边清单与当前医科学生的阅读倾向之间的相当大的脱节。达尔豪斯医学院的学生主要阅读并受到与医学领域和医生有关的作品的影响,而不是奥斯勒所提出的广泛选择。虽然这可能反映了医学领域的变化或当前培训的沉浸性,但它也促使人们反思奥斯勒在他最初的床边图书馆中看到的价值,以及这些教训是否会在未来几代医生身上丢失。
Osler’s bedside library: Updated essentials from medical students
Over 100 years ago Sir William Osler made a list of ten readings that should be at the bedside of every medical student reflecting Osler’s broad and prolific reading habits. Time has continued to flow since Osler’s reading list was proposed and thus, its place in current day medical education warrants reflection. Fundamental questions in this respect include: do medical students still read in the same capacity as their century-old counterparts? If so, how widely does Osler’s original reading list apply to current medical students? Finally, what works would today’s medical students recommend having at the bedside? Students representing the classes of 2016 to 2020 were surveyed at Dalhousie Medical School, constituting one of the largest student efforts in the literature to date to provide per- spectives on Osler’s bedside reading list as well as consensus towards an updated library.This study highlights the considerable disconnect between Osler’s original bedside list and reading tendencies of current medical students. Dalhousie medical students predominantly read and are influenced largely by works pertaining to the medical field and physicians, as opposed to the broad selections set forth by Osler.Although this may reflect the changing medical field or the immersive nature of current training, it also urges reflection as to the value Osler saw in his original bedside library and whether these lessons may be lost on future generations of physicians.