将人为因素量化并整合到检测概率评估中的方法

M. Bertovic, J. Given, V. Rentala, M. Wall, D. Kanzler, J. Lehleitner, T. Heckel, V. Tkachenko
{"title":"将人为因素量化并整合到检测概率评估中的方法","authors":"M. Bertovic, J. Given, V. Rentala, M. Wall, D. Kanzler, J. Lehleitner, T. Heckel, V. Tkachenko","doi":"10.1784/insi.2023.65.7.364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human factors (HFs) are a frequently mentioned topic when talking about the reliability of non-destructive testing (NDT). However, probability of detection (POD), the commonly used measure of NDT reliability, only looks at the technical capability of an NDT system to detect a defect.\n After several decades of research on the influence of HFs on NDT reliability, there is still no commonly accepted approach to rendering HFs visible in reliability assessment. This paper provides an overview of possible quantitative and qualitative methods for integrating HFs into the reliability\n assessment. It is concluded that reliability assessment is best carried out using both quantifiable and non-quantifiable approaches to HFs.","PeriodicalId":344397,"journal":{"name":"Insight - Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods for quantification and integration of human factors into probability of detection assessments\",\"authors\":\"M. Bertovic, J. Given, V. Rentala, M. Wall, D. Kanzler, J. Lehleitner, T. Heckel, V. Tkachenko\",\"doi\":\"10.1784/insi.2023.65.7.364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Human factors (HFs) are a frequently mentioned topic when talking about the reliability of non-destructive testing (NDT). However, probability of detection (POD), the commonly used measure of NDT reliability, only looks at the technical capability of an NDT system to detect a defect.\\n After several decades of research on the influence of HFs on NDT reliability, there is still no commonly accepted approach to rendering HFs visible in reliability assessment. This paper provides an overview of possible quantitative and qualitative methods for integrating HFs into the reliability\\n assessment. It is concluded that reliability assessment is best carried out using both quantifiable and non-quantifiable approaches to HFs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insight - Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insight - Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2023.65.7.364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insight - Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.2023.65.7.364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在谈论无损检测(NDT)的可靠性时,人为因素(HFs)是一个经常被提及的话题。然而,检测概率(POD)是无损检测可靠性的常用度量,它只关注无损检测系统检测缺陷的技术能力。经过几十年对高频振荡对无损检测可靠性影响的研究,在可靠性评估中仍然没有普遍接受的方法来显示高频振荡。本文概述了将高频波动纳入可靠性评估的可能的定量和定性方法。结论是,可靠性评估最好同时使用可量化和不可量化的方法来进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Methods for quantification and integration of human factors into probability of detection assessments
Human factors (HFs) are a frequently mentioned topic when talking about the reliability of non-destructive testing (NDT). However, probability of detection (POD), the commonly used measure of NDT reliability, only looks at the technical capability of an NDT system to detect a defect. After several decades of research on the influence of HFs on NDT reliability, there is still no commonly accepted approach to rendering HFs visible in reliability assessment. This paper provides an overview of possible quantitative and qualitative methods for integrating HFs into the reliability assessment. It is concluded that reliability assessment is best carried out using both quantifiable and non-quantifiable approaches to HFs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multi-criterion analysis-based artificial intelligence system for condition monitoring of electrical transformers MFL detection of adjacent pipeline defects: a finite element simulation of signal characteristics A multi-frequency balanced electromagnetic field measurement for arbitrary angles of pipeline cracks with high sensitivity Ultrasonic total focusing method for internal defects in composite insulators Developments in ultrasonic and eddy current testing in the 1970s and 1980s with emphasis on the requirements of the UK nuclear power industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1