{"title":"三个时代的非洲研究参考书","authors":"J. Mcilwaine","doi":"10.3366/ABIB.2006.VII","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following reflections came to mind during my work in 2005 and 2006 on producing the revised 2 edition of my Africa: guide to reference material (Lochcarron: Hans Zell, 2007), hereinafter referred to as my Guide. They also draw upon and recommend for further reading a number of perceptive articles that have been published on Africanist reference works in the last few years. The emphasis, as in my Guide, will be on reference material other than bibliographies. I have already written in these pages about African studies bibliography (McIlwaine 2001) and Peter Limb in last year’s volume gave an elegant ‘state-of-the art’ account of this field (Limb 2006). The introduction to my Guide argues that while bibliographies of Africa are comparatively well covered by existing lists such as J.D. Pearson, World bibliography of African bibliographies (Oxford: Blackwell, 1975) and Yvette Scheven, Bibliographies for African studies, 1970-1985 (Oxford: Hans Zell, 1988) and Bibliographies for African studies, 1987-1993 (London: Hans Zell, 1994), coverage of other categories of reference works is much less readily available. This lack of coverage is something that both editions of my own work and Al Kagan’s Reference guide to Africa: a bibliography of source, 2 ed., (Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2005) seek to remedy. The question that needs to be asked, of course, is: what is meant by ‘reference works’? The term is vague, especially when one has specifically excluded bibliographies. The two main defining characteristics are, firstly, that such sources are concerned primarily with providing factual data, rather than interpretation, and secondly, that their arrangement is intended to facilitate rapid consultation, rather than requiring the whole text to be scanned to locate facts. Such tidy guidelines are easy to draw and impossible to maintain. As I note in my Guide, perhaps the first ‘reference work’ for Africa that would come into many minds would be Lord Hailey’s An African survey, discussed further below, which is a volume that accompanies its extensive factual data by equally extensive comment and interpretation, and that is arranged as a straightforward monograph with chapters, rather than having a quick-reference structure. It is also, of course, wrong to suggest that collections of factual information imply no interpretation: the very process of selection of what data to include and what to exclude, and how they should be presented, obviously involves interpretation. The first edition of my Guide had no limits on the date of publication of titles included, and indeed contained many references to sources published in the 19 century. The new 2 edition only includes material published since 1938 (the year of Lord Hailey’s African survey) but this decision was taken simply to","PeriodicalId":337749,"journal":{"name":"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The three ages of African studies reference works\",\"authors\":\"J. Mcilwaine\",\"doi\":\"10.3366/ABIB.2006.VII\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following reflections came to mind during my work in 2005 and 2006 on producing the revised 2 edition of my Africa: guide to reference material (Lochcarron: Hans Zell, 2007), hereinafter referred to as my Guide. They also draw upon and recommend for further reading a number of perceptive articles that have been published on Africanist reference works in the last few years. The emphasis, as in my Guide, will be on reference material other than bibliographies. I have already written in these pages about African studies bibliography (McIlwaine 2001) and Peter Limb in last year’s volume gave an elegant ‘state-of-the art’ account of this field (Limb 2006). The introduction to my Guide argues that while bibliographies of Africa are comparatively well covered by existing lists such as J.D. Pearson, World bibliography of African bibliographies (Oxford: Blackwell, 1975) and Yvette Scheven, Bibliographies for African studies, 1970-1985 (Oxford: Hans Zell, 1988) and Bibliographies for African studies, 1987-1993 (London: Hans Zell, 1994), coverage of other categories of reference works is much less readily available. This lack of coverage is something that both editions of my own work and Al Kagan’s Reference guide to Africa: a bibliography of source, 2 ed., (Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2005) seek to remedy. The question that needs to be asked, of course, is: what is meant by ‘reference works’? The term is vague, especially when one has specifically excluded bibliographies. The two main defining characteristics are, firstly, that such sources are concerned primarily with providing factual data, rather than interpretation, and secondly, that their arrangement is intended to facilitate rapid consultation, rather than requiring the whole text to be scanned to locate facts. Such tidy guidelines are easy to draw and impossible to maintain. As I note in my Guide, perhaps the first ‘reference work’ for Africa that would come into many minds would be Lord Hailey’s An African survey, discussed further below, which is a volume that accompanies its extensive factual data by equally extensive comment and interpretation, and that is arranged as a straightforward monograph with chapters, rather than having a quick-reference structure. It is also, of course, wrong to suggest that collections of factual information imply no interpretation: the very process of selection of what data to include and what to exclude, and how they should be presented, obviously involves interpretation. The first edition of my Guide had no limits on the date of publication of titles included, and indeed contained many references to sources published in the 19 century. The new 2 edition only includes material published since 1938 (the year of Lord Hailey’s African survey) but this decision was taken simply to\",\"PeriodicalId\":337749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3366/ABIB.2006.VII\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/ABIB.2006.VII","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在2005年和2006年编写我的《非洲:参考资料指南》修订版(Lochcarron: Hans Zell, 2007)期间,我产生了以下几点思考,以下简称《指南》。他们还借鉴并建议进一步阅读一些在过去几年出版的关于非洲主义者参考作品的有洞察力的文章。和我的指南一样,重点将放在参考资料而不是参考书目上。我已经在这些页面上写过关于非洲研究参考书目(McIlwaine 2001), Peter Limb在去年的卷中给出了这个领域的优雅的“艺术状态”描述(Limb 2006)。我的指南的引言认为,虽然现有的书目比较好地涵盖了非洲的参考书目,如J.D. Pearson的《非洲参考书目世界》(牛津:布莱克威尔,1975年)和Yvette Scheven的《非洲研究书目》,1970-1985年(牛津:汉斯·泽尔,1988年)和《非洲研究书目》,1987-1993年(伦敦:汉斯·泽尔,1994年),但对其他类别参考书目的覆盖要少得多。我自己的作品和Al Kagan的《非洲参考指南:来源参考书目,2版》(Lanham, MD:稻草人出版社,2005)都试图弥补这一缺失。当然,需要问的问题是:“参考作品”是什么意思?这个词是模糊的,特别是当一个人明确地排除书目时。两个主要的决定性特征是,第一,这些来源主要是提供事实数据,而不是解释,第二,它们的安排是为了促进快速协商,而不是要求浏览全文以确定事实。这样整洁的指导方针很容易画出来,而且不可能维护。正如我在我的指南中所指出的,也许许多人会想到的第一本关于非洲的“参考著作”是黑利勋爵的《非洲调查》,下面将进一步讨论,这是一卷书,伴随着大量的事实数据,同样广泛的评论和解释,它被安排为一个简单的专著,有章节,而不是一个快速的参考结构。当然,认为事实性信息的收集不意味着解释也是错误的:选择包括哪些数据,排除哪些数据,以及如何呈现这些数据的过程显然涉及解释。我的《指南》第一版对所包括的标题的出版日期没有限制,而且确实包含了许多19世纪出版的资料。新版只收录了自1938年(黑利勋爵非洲调查的那一年)以来出版的材料,但这个决定只是为了
The following reflections came to mind during my work in 2005 and 2006 on producing the revised 2 edition of my Africa: guide to reference material (Lochcarron: Hans Zell, 2007), hereinafter referred to as my Guide. They also draw upon and recommend for further reading a number of perceptive articles that have been published on Africanist reference works in the last few years. The emphasis, as in my Guide, will be on reference material other than bibliographies. I have already written in these pages about African studies bibliography (McIlwaine 2001) and Peter Limb in last year’s volume gave an elegant ‘state-of-the art’ account of this field (Limb 2006). The introduction to my Guide argues that while bibliographies of Africa are comparatively well covered by existing lists such as J.D. Pearson, World bibliography of African bibliographies (Oxford: Blackwell, 1975) and Yvette Scheven, Bibliographies for African studies, 1970-1985 (Oxford: Hans Zell, 1988) and Bibliographies for African studies, 1987-1993 (London: Hans Zell, 1994), coverage of other categories of reference works is much less readily available. This lack of coverage is something that both editions of my own work and Al Kagan’s Reference guide to Africa: a bibliography of source, 2 ed., (Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2005) seek to remedy. The question that needs to be asked, of course, is: what is meant by ‘reference works’? The term is vague, especially when one has specifically excluded bibliographies. The two main defining characteristics are, firstly, that such sources are concerned primarily with providing factual data, rather than interpretation, and secondly, that their arrangement is intended to facilitate rapid consultation, rather than requiring the whole text to be scanned to locate facts. Such tidy guidelines are easy to draw and impossible to maintain. As I note in my Guide, perhaps the first ‘reference work’ for Africa that would come into many minds would be Lord Hailey’s An African survey, discussed further below, which is a volume that accompanies its extensive factual data by equally extensive comment and interpretation, and that is arranged as a straightforward monograph with chapters, rather than having a quick-reference structure. It is also, of course, wrong to suggest that collections of factual information imply no interpretation: the very process of selection of what data to include and what to exclude, and how they should be presented, obviously involves interpretation. The first edition of my Guide had no limits on the date of publication of titles included, and indeed contained many references to sources published in the 19 century. The new 2 edition only includes material published since 1938 (the year of Lord Hailey’s African survey) but this decision was taken simply to