行政行为的非法性是行政行为正当性的前提

D. Oleynik
{"title":"行政行为的非法性是行政行为正当性的前提","authors":"D. Oleynik","doi":"10.12737/jflcl.2021.062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article considers the legal regulation, content and algorithm for reviewing legality of an administrative act, taking into account that the illegality of an administrative act is one of the reasons for challenging an administrative act in court according to the law of the Federal Republic of Germany. The author, based on German legal literature and judicial practice, in particular reveals the principle of legality of public administration and describes the requirements of legality of an administrative act, stemming from this principle. The principle of legality in public administration contains two components: the principle of (1) priority of law, according to which public administration authorities must act in accordance with the law, and the principle of (2) proviso of law, according to which public administration authorities may only act if they have been authorised to do so by law. It follows that an administrative act is legal if it is based on a legal provision — authorizing administration to act this way — legal requirements regarding competence; procedure and form (formal legality) have been complied with, and the public administration body has duly considered legal preconditions for its application; as well as limitations as to the choice of legal consequences (material legality). As a legal consequence, the law may provide for a binding (bound) decision or give the public administration the freedom to choose between different courses of action (discretion). The discretion must be exercised in accordance with the purpose of the АДМИНИСТРАТИВНОЕ ПРАВО. ФИНАНСОВОЕ ПРАВО. ИНФОРМАЦИОННОЕ ПРАВО Журнал зарубежного законодательства и сравнительного правоведения. 2021. Т. 17. No 6 17 power granted and within the limits set by law, as well as those derived from the constitutional principles of proportionality, equal treatment and fundamental rights.","PeriodicalId":159173,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illegality of the Administrative Act as a Prerequisite for the Merits of the Administrative Action in German Law\",\"authors\":\"D. Oleynik\",\"doi\":\"10.12737/jflcl.2021.062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article considers the legal regulation, content and algorithm for reviewing legality of an administrative act, taking into account that the illegality of an administrative act is one of the reasons for challenging an administrative act in court according to the law of the Federal Republic of Germany. The author, based on German legal literature and judicial practice, in particular reveals the principle of legality of public administration and describes the requirements of legality of an administrative act, stemming from this principle. The principle of legality in public administration contains two components: the principle of (1) priority of law, according to which public administration authorities must act in accordance with the law, and the principle of (2) proviso of law, according to which public administration authorities may only act if they have been authorised to do so by law. It follows that an administrative act is legal if it is based on a legal provision — authorizing administration to act this way — legal requirements regarding competence; procedure and form (formal legality) have been complied with, and the public administration body has duly considered legal preconditions for its application; as well as limitations as to the choice of legal consequences (material legality). As a legal consequence, the law may provide for a binding (bound) decision or give the public administration the freedom to choose between different courses of action (discretion). The discretion must be exercised in accordance with the purpose of the АДМИНИСТРАТИВНОЕ ПРАВО. ФИНАНСОВОЕ ПРАВО. ИНФОРМАЦИОННОЕ ПРАВО Журнал зарубежного законодательства и сравнительного правоведения. 2021. Т. 17. No 6 17 power granted and within the limits set by law, as well as those derived from the constitutional principles of proportionality, equal treatment and fundamental rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12737/jflcl.2021.062\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12737/jflcl.2021.062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

考虑到行政行为的非法性是德意志联邦共和国法律对行政行为提起诉讼的理由之一,本文对行政行为合法性审查的法律规定、内容和算法进行了研究。笔者在德国法律文献和司法实践的基础上,特别揭示了公共行政的合法性原则,并阐述了由此产生的行政行为的合法性要求。公共行政的合法性原则包括两个组成部分:(1)法律优先原则,根据这一原则,公共行政当局必须依法行事;(2)法律附带条款原则,根据这一原则,公共行政当局只有在得到法律授权的情况下才能行事。因此,如果一项行政行为是基于一项法律规定——授权行政当局这样做——关于权限的法律要求,那么该行政行为就是合法的;程序和形式(正式合法性)已得到遵守,公共行政机构已适当考虑了其适用的法律先决条件;以及对法律后果选择的限制(物质合法性)。作为一种法律后果,法律可能规定一项有约束力的决定,或给予公共行政部门在不同行动方案之间进行选择的自由(酌处权)。裁量权的行使必须符合АДМИНИСТРАТИВНОЕ ПРАВО的宗旨。ФИНАНСОВОЕПРАВО。ИНФОРМАЦИОННОЕПРАВОЖурналзарубежногозаконодательстваисравнительногоправоведения。2021. Т。17. 授予和在法律规定的范围内的权力,以及从相称性、平等待遇和基本权利的宪法原则中产生的权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Illegality of the Administrative Act as a Prerequisite for the Merits of the Administrative Action in German Law
The article considers the legal regulation, content and algorithm for reviewing legality of an administrative act, taking into account that the illegality of an administrative act is one of the reasons for challenging an administrative act in court according to the law of the Federal Republic of Germany. The author, based on German legal literature and judicial practice, in particular reveals the principle of legality of public administration and describes the requirements of legality of an administrative act, stemming from this principle. The principle of legality in public administration contains two components: the principle of (1) priority of law, according to which public administration authorities must act in accordance with the law, and the principle of (2) proviso of law, according to which public administration authorities may only act if they have been authorised to do so by law. It follows that an administrative act is legal if it is based on a legal provision — authorizing administration to act this way — legal requirements regarding competence; procedure and form (formal legality) have been complied with, and the public administration body has duly considered legal preconditions for its application; as well as limitations as to the choice of legal consequences (material legality). As a legal consequence, the law may provide for a binding (bound) decision or give the public administration the freedom to choose between different courses of action (discretion). The discretion must be exercised in accordance with the purpose of the АДМИНИСТРАТИВНОЕ ПРАВО. ФИНАНСОВОЕ ПРАВО. ИНФОРМАЦИОННОЕ ПРАВО Журнал зарубежного законодательства и сравнительного правоведения. 2021. Т. 17. No 6 17 power granted and within the limits set by law, as well as those derived from the constitutional principles of proportionality, equal treatment and fundamental rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Phenomenon of the Use of Computer Technology in the Commission of Crimes Against the Person: Analysis of International Documents and Criminal Legislation of Individual Countries Professional Monopoly of Lawyers in the States of the Romano-German Legal System Constitutional Development and Constitutional Stability are Two Sides of the Same Coin Interaction of Party and Electoral Systems in the CIS Countries (Current Trends) The Ideas of Immanuel Kant on International Law and Human Rights and Their Further Development in the Modern Era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1