基于价值的实证研究计划评价

S. Biffl, D. Winkler
{"title":"基于价值的实证研究计划评价","authors":"S. Biffl, D. Winkler","doi":"10.1109/ESEM.2007.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The planning phase of empirical studies is a success-critical key activity in empirical research to achieve best benefits for contributing stakeholders, e.g., researchers and industry partners, and to reduce study risks, e.g., insufficient validity and unaddressed stakeholder win conditions. The design of empirical studies typically covers issues of empirical methodology, but seldom explicitly discusses tradeoffs between conflicting study goals. This work proposes a value-based empirical research planning framework for eliciting and reconciling stakeholder win conditions in order to compare the benefits and risks of empirical study variants and reports on findings from an initial feasibility study in a ISERN meeting of empirical research experts.","PeriodicalId":124420,"journal":{"name":"First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value-Based Empirical Research Plan Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"S. Biffl, D. Winkler\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ESEM.2007.50\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The planning phase of empirical studies is a success-critical key activity in empirical research to achieve best benefits for contributing stakeholders, e.g., researchers and industry partners, and to reduce study risks, e.g., insufficient validity and unaddressed stakeholder win conditions. The design of empirical studies typically covers issues of empirical methodology, but seldom explicitly discusses tradeoffs between conflicting study goals. This work proposes a value-based empirical research planning framework for eliciting and reconciling stakeholder win conditions in order to compare the benefits and risks of empirical study variants and reports on findings from an initial feasibility study in a ISERN meeting of empirical research experts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":124420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2007.50\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESEM.2007.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

实证研究的规划阶段是实证研究成功与否的关键活动,旨在为有贡献的利益相关者(如研究人员和行业合作伙伴)实现最佳效益,并降低研究风险(如有效性不足和未解决的利益相关者获胜条件)。实证研究的设计通常涵盖实证方法论的问题,但很少明确讨论冲突研究目标之间的权衡。这项工作提出了一个基于价值的实证研究规划框架,用于引出和协调利益相关者获胜条件,以便比较实证研究变量的收益和风险,并在ISERN实证研究专家会议上报告初步可行性研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Value-Based Empirical Research Plan Evaluation
The planning phase of empirical studies is a success-critical key activity in empirical research to achieve best benefits for contributing stakeholders, e.g., researchers and industry partners, and to reduce study risks, e.g., insufficient validity and unaddressed stakeholder win conditions. The design of empirical studies typically covers issues of empirical methodology, but seldom explicitly discusses tradeoffs between conflicting study goals. This work proposes a value-based empirical research planning framework for eliciting and reconciling stakeholder win conditions in order to compare the benefits and risks of empirical study variants and reports on findings from an initial feasibility study in a ISERN meeting of empirical research experts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparing Model Generated with Expert Generated IV&V Activity Plans Decision Support with EMPEROR A cost effectiveness indicator for software development Fine-Grained Software Metrics in Practice Automated Information Extraction from Empirical Software Engineering Literature: Is that possible?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1