初级保健中的动态心电图监测

G. Kassianos
{"title":"初级保健中的动态心电图监测","authors":"G. Kassianos","doi":"10.3132/PCCJ.2008.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Investigating symptoms suggestive of cardiac arrhythmia in primary care requires a strategy beyond the resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), as the test is generally only of use while the patient is experiencing discomfort during the recording. This study assessed the use of automated ambulatory ECG monitors in diagnosing cardiac arrhythmias. Design: A retrospective review of patients at one general practice. Participants: 52 consecutive patients (73% female; age 52+18 years, range 22 to 93 years) with symptoms suggestive of cardiac arrhythmia. Method: Automated ECG was recorded for 24 hours. Patients were also given a diary to record symptoms. The ECG reports were examined at the end of the test and correlated with symptoms, patient notes, and history before a decision to refer to secondary care was made. Results: Episodes (> 30 s) of tachycardia (> 120 bpm) were present in 52% of patients and bradycardia (< 50 bpm) in 19%. The most common supraventricular arrhythmia was atrial ectopics, detected in 52% of patients. Three patients (6%) were found to have atrial fibrillation (AF) during the 24-hour test. Ventricular arrhythmia was detected in 71% of patients, with an average ectopic rate of 28+88 per hour (range < 1 to 397 per hour). Overall, 73% of patients were symptomatic during the 24-hour test, with 10% experiencing symptoms on at least 10 occasions. Conclusions: Use of ambulatory ECG in patients with symptoms of cardiac arrhythmia proved feasible and useful in primary care. Results were used as the basis of referrals for 50% of patients tested, and to inform initiation or changes of medication in a further 24% of patients.","PeriodicalId":308856,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Cardiovascular Journal (pccj)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ambulatory ECG monitoring in primary care\",\"authors\":\"G. Kassianos\",\"doi\":\"10.3132/PCCJ.2008.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Investigating symptoms suggestive of cardiac arrhythmia in primary care requires a strategy beyond the resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), as the test is generally only of use while the patient is experiencing discomfort during the recording. This study assessed the use of automated ambulatory ECG monitors in diagnosing cardiac arrhythmias. Design: A retrospective review of patients at one general practice. Participants: 52 consecutive patients (73% female; age 52+18 years, range 22 to 93 years) with symptoms suggestive of cardiac arrhythmia. Method: Automated ECG was recorded for 24 hours. Patients were also given a diary to record symptoms. The ECG reports were examined at the end of the test and correlated with symptoms, patient notes, and history before a decision to refer to secondary care was made. Results: Episodes (> 30 s) of tachycardia (> 120 bpm) were present in 52% of patients and bradycardia (< 50 bpm) in 19%. The most common supraventricular arrhythmia was atrial ectopics, detected in 52% of patients. Three patients (6%) were found to have atrial fibrillation (AF) during the 24-hour test. Ventricular arrhythmia was detected in 71% of patients, with an average ectopic rate of 28+88 per hour (range < 1 to 397 per hour). Overall, 73% of patients were symptomatic during the 24-hour test, with 10% experiencing symptoms on at least 10 occasions. Conclusions: Use of ambulatory ECG in patients with symptoms of cardiac arrhythmia proved feasible and useful in primary care. Results were used as the basis of referrals for 50% of patients tested, and to inform initiation or changes of medication in a further 24% of patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary Care Cardiovascular Journal (pccj)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary Care Cardiovascular Journal (pccj)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3132/PCCJ.2008.027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care Cardiovascular Journal (pccj)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3132/PCCJ.2008.027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在初级保健中调查提示心律失常的症状需要一种超越静息12导联心电图(ECG)的策略,因为该测试通常仅在患者在记录过程中感到不适时使用。本研究评估了自动动态心电图监护仪在心律失常诊断中的应用。设计:对一所全科医院的患者进行回顾性研究。参与者:52例连续患者(73%为女性;年龄52+18岁,年龄22 ~ 93岁,有心律失常症状。方法:自动心电图记录24小时。患者还被给予日记以记录症状。在检查结束时检查心电图报告,并将其与症状、患者记录和病史相关联,然后再决定是否转诊。结果:52%的患者出现心动过速(> 120 bpm)发作(> 30 s), 19%的患者出现心动过缓(< 50 bpm)。最常见的室上性心律失常是房异位,在52%的患者中检测到。3例患者(6%)在24小时的测试中发现心房颤动(AF)。71%的患者检测到室性心律失常,平均异位率为28+88 / h(范围< 1 ~ 397 / h)。总体而言,73%的患者在24小时的测试中出现症状,10%的患者至少出现10次症状。结论:在有心律失常症状的患者中使用动态心电图在初级保健中是可行和有用的。结果被用作50%的患者转诊的基础,并告知24%的患者开始或改变药物治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ambulatory ECG monitoring in primary care
Objective: Investigating symptoms suggestive of cardiac arrhythmia in primary care requires a strategy beyond the resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), as the test is generally only of use while the patient is experiencing discomfort during the recording. This study assessed the use of automated ambulatory ECG monitors in diagnosing cardiac arrhythmias. Design: A retrospective review of patients at one general practice. Participants: 52 consecutive patients (73% female; age 52+18 years, range 22 to 93 years) with symptoms suggestive of cardiac arrhythmia. Method: Automated ECG was recorded for 24 hours. Patients were also given a diary to record symptoms. The ECG reports were examined at the end of the test and correlated with symptoms, patient notes, and history before a decision to refer to secondary care was made. Results: Episodes (> 30 s) of tachycardia (> 120 bpm) were present in 52% of patients and bradycardia (< 50 bpm) in 19%. The most common supraventricular arrhythmia was atrial ectopics, detected in 52% of patients. Three patients (6%) were found to have atrial fibrillation (AF) during the 24-hour test. Ventricular arrhythmia was detected in 71% of patients, with an average ectopic rate of 28+88 per hour (range < 1 to 397 per hour). Overall, 73% of patients were symptomatic during the 24-hour test, with 10% experiencing symptoms on at least 10 occasions. Conclusions: Use of ambulatory ECG in patients with symptoms of cardiac arrhythmia proved feasible and useful in primary care. Results were used as the basis of referrals for 50% of patients tested, and to inform initiation or changes of medication in a further 24% of patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statin prescribing in Europe: A comparison of differences and potential impact on health outcomes Atrial fibrillation: which patients should be managed in primary, secondary and tertiary care? How well are we doing in lipid management Assessing cardiovascular risk in the 10-minute consultation Smoking cessation 1: Choosing the right pharmacotherapy for each patient
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1