市场传染的因果分析:双重机器学习方法

Joseph Simonian
{"title":"市场传染的因果分析:双重机器学习方法","authors":"Joseph Simonian","doi":"10.3905/jfds.2023.1.122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Making reliable causal inferences is integral to both explaining past events and forecasting the future. Although there are various theories of economic causality, there has not yet been a wide adoption of machine learning techniques for causal inference within finance. One recently developed framework, double machine learning, is an approach to causal inference that is specifically designed to correct for bias in statistical analysis. In doing so, it allows for a more precise evaluation of treatment effects in the presence of confounders. In this article, the author uses double machine learning to study market contagion. He considers the treatment variable to be the weekly return of the S&P 500 Index below a specific threshold and the outcome to be the weekly return in a single major non-US market. In analyzing each non-US market, the other non-US markets under consideration are used as confounders. The author presents two case studies. In the first, outcomes are observed in the same week as the treatment is observed and, in the second, in the week after. His results show that, in the first case study, sizable and statistically significant contagion effects are observed but somewhat diluted due to the presence of confounders. In contrast, in the second case study, more ambiguous contagion effects are observed and the level of statistical significance is measurably lower than those observed in the first case study, indicating that contagion effects are most clearly transmitted in the same week that the dislocation in the S&P 500 occurs.","PeriodicalId":199045,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Financial Data Science","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Causal Analysis of Market Contagion: A Double Machine Learning Approach\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Simonian\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jfds.2023.1.122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Making reliable causal inferences is integral to both explaining past events and forecasting the future. Although there are various theories of economic causality, there has not yet been a wide adoption of machine learning techniques for causal inference within finance. One recently developed framework, double machine learning, is an approach to causal inference that is specifically designed to correct for bias in statistical analysis. In doing so, it allows for a more precise evaluation of treatment effects in the presence of confounders. In this article, the author uses double machine learning to study market contagion. He considers the treatment variable to be the weekly return of the S&P 500 Index below a specific threshold and the outcome to be the weekly return in a single major non-US market. In analyzing each non-US market, the other non-US markets under consideration are used as confounders. The author presents two case studies. In the first, outcomes are observed in the same week as the treatment is observed and, in the second, in the week after. His results show that, in the first case study, sizable and statistically significant contagion effects are observed but somewhat diluted due to the presence of confounders. In contrast, in the second case study, more ambiguous contagion effects are observed and the level of statistical significance is measurably lower than those observed in the first case study, indicating that contagion effects are most clearly transmitted in the same week that the dislocation in the S&P 500 occurs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":199045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Financial Data Science\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Financial Data Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jfds.2023.1.122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Financial Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jfds.2023.1.122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

做出可靠的因果推论对于解释过去的事件和预测未来都是不可或缺的。尽管有各种各样的经济因果关系理论,但尚未广泛采用机器学习技术在金融领域进行因果推理。最近开发的一个框架,双机器学习,是一种因果推理的方法,专门用于纠正统计分析中的偏差。这样,在存在混杂因素的情况下,它可以更精确地评估治疗效果。在本文中,作者使用双机器学习来研究市场传染。他认为,处理变量是标准普尔500指数(S&P 500 Index)低于某一特定阈值的周收益率,而结果是一个非美国主要市场的周收益率。在分析每个非美国市场时,考虑的其他非美国市场被用作混杂因素。作者提出了两个案例研究。在第一种情况下,在观察治疗的同一周观察结果,在第二种情况下,在治疗后的一周观察结果。他的结果表明,在第一个案例研究中,观察到相当大的和统计上显著的传染效应,但由于混杂因素的存在而有所稀释。相比之下,在第二个案例研究中,观察到更模糊的传染效应,统计显著性水平明显低于第一个案例研究中观察到的水平,这表明传染效应在标准普尔500指数出现混乱的同一周内传播得最清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Causal Analysis of Market Contagion: A Double Machine Learning Approach
Making reliable causal inferences is integral to both explaining past events and forecasting the future. Although there are various theories of economic causality, there has not yet been a wide adoption of machine learning techniques for causal inference within finance. One recently developed framework, double machine learning, is an approach to causal inference that is specifically designed to correct for bias in statistical analysis. In doing so, it allows for a more precise evaluation of treatment effects in the presence of confounders. In this article, the author uses double machine learning to study market contagion. He considers the treatment variable to be the weekly return of the S&P 500 Index below a specific threshold and the outcome to be the weekly return in a single major non-US market. In analyzing each non-US market, the other non-US markets under consideration are used as confounders. The author presents two case studies. In the first, outcomes are observed in the same week as the treatment is observed and, in the second, in the week after. His results show that, in the first case study, sizable and statistically significant contagion effects are observed but somewhat diluted due to the presence of confounders. In contrast, in the second case study, more ambiguous contagion effects are observed and the level of statistical significance is measurably lower than those observed in the first case study, indicating that contagion effects are most clearly transmitted in the same week that the dislocation in the S&P 500 occurs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Managing Editor’s Letter Explainable Machine Learning Models of Consumer Credit Risk Predicting Returns with Machine Learning across Horizons, Firm Size, and Time Deep Calibration with Artificial Neural Network: A Performance Comparison on Option-Pricing Models RIFT: Pretraining and Applications for Representations of Interrelated Financial Time Series
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1