常规放疗治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的可行性回顾性分析

Prakash Bhagat, Sanjoy Roy, D. Lahiri, T. Maji, D. Ray, J. Biswas, P. Chaudhuri
{"title":"常规放疗治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的可行性回顾性分析","authors":"Prakash Bhagat, Sanjoy Roy, D. Lahiri, T. Maji, D. Ray, J. Biswas, P. Chaudhuri","doi":"10.4103/2348-3113.152322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Analysis was done to assess the implications of total radiation treatment duration towards locally advanced cervical cancer. Methods: A comparative study was conducted in CNCI, Kolkata. A total of 38 patients were studied with interdigited brachyttherapy during the course of conventional teleradiotherapy and they were compared to a total of 39 patients with conventional sequential teletherapy and brachytherapy. Results: In the experimental arm all the patients had complete response to treatment whereas, 24 patients (85.7%) in the conventional arm had complete response [P = 0.08]. At the last follow up 28 patients (73.68%) in the study arm and 17 patients (43.58%) in the control arm were free of disease. The failure rate in the conventional control arm was significantly higher [P = 0.035]. Test of proportion derived from data also showed that the proportion of patients with no evidence of disease at the time of last follow-up was significantly higher in the study arm compared to the control arm [P < 0.05] and the proportion of patients with persistent disease was significantly less in the stuwdy arm compared to the control arm [P < 0.05]. The probability of disease-free survival in percentage according to the curve at the time of median follow-up was approximately 70% for study arm and 60% for control arm [log-rank test, P = 0.2463]. Conclusion: we should hence minimize treatment time and avoid any planned or unplanned interruptions or delays by timely integration of external beam and intra-cavitary irradiation that may yield a better local control in locally advanced cervical cancer.","PeriodicalId":166206,"journal":{"name":"Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Reports","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expedience of conventional radiotherapy in locally advanced cervix cancer: A retrospective analysis\",\"authors\":\"Prakash Bhagat, Sanjoy Roy, D. Lahiri, T. Maji, D. Ray, J. Biswas, P. Chaudhuri\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/2348-3113.152322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Analysis was done to assess the implications of total radiation treatment duration towards locally advanced cervical cancer. Methods: A comparative study was conducted in CNCI, Kolkata. A total of 38 patients were studied with interdigited brachyttherapy during the course of conventional teleradiotherapy and they were compared to a total of 39 patients with conventional sequential teletherapy and brachytherapy. Results: In the experimental arm all the patients had complete response to treatment whereas, 24 patients (85.7%) in the conventional arm had complete response [P = 0.08]. At the last follow up 28 patients (73.68%) in the study arm and 17 patients (43.58%) in the control arm were free of disease. The failure rate in the conventional control arm was significantly higher [P = 0.035]. Test of proportion derived from data also showed that the proportion of patients with no evidence of disease at the time of last follow-up was significantly higher in the study arm compared to the control arm [P < 0.05] and the proportion of patients with persistent disease was significantly less in the stuwdy arm compared to the control arm [P < 0.05]. The probability of disease-free survival in percentage according to the curve at the time of median follow-up was approximately 70% for study arm and 60% for control arm [log-rank test, P = 0.2463]. Conclusion: we should hence minimize treatment time and avoid any planned or unplanned interruptions or delays by timely integration of external beam and intra-cavitary irradiation that may yield a better local control in locally advanced cervical cancer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Reports\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/2348-3113.152322\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2348-3113.152322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析总放射治疗时间对局部晚期宫颈癌的影响。方法:在加尔各答CNCI进行比较研究。在常规远程放射治疗过程中,共对38例患者进行了指间近距离放射治疗,并与常规顺序远程治疗和近距离放射治疗的39例患者进行了比较。结果:实验组全部患者完全缓解,常规组24例(85.7%)患者完全缓解[P = 0.08]。最后随访时,研究组28例(73.68%)无疾病,对照组17例(43.58%)无疾病。常规控制臂的失败率明显高于对照组[P = 0.035]。根据资料进行的比例检验也显示,研究组末次随访时无疾病证据的患者比例显著高于对照组[P < 0.05],持续疾病的患者比例显著低于对照组[P < 0.05]。根据中位随访时曲线,研究组的无病生存率百分比约为70%,对照组为60% [log-rank检验,P = 0.2463]。结论:对于局部晚期宫颈癌,及时结合外照射和腔内照射,可减少治疗时间,避免任何计划或计划外的中断或延误,使局部晚期宫颈癌得到更好的局部控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Expedience of conventional radiotherapy in locally advanced cervix cancer: A retrospective analysis
Objective: Analysis was done to assess the implications of total radiation treatment duration towards locally advanced cervical cancer. Methods: A comparative study was conducted in CNCI, Kolkata. A total of 38 patients were studied with interdigited brachyttherapy during the course of conventional teleradiotherapy and they were compared to a total of 39 patients with conventional sequential teletherapy and brachytherapy. Results: In the experimental arm all the patients had complete response to treatment whereas, 24 patients (85.7%) in the conventional arm had complete response [P = 0.08]. At the last follow up 28 patients (73.68%) in the study arm and 17 patients (43.58%) in the control arm were free of disease. The failure rate in the conventional control arm was significantly higher [P = 0.035]. Test of proportion derived from data also showed that the proportion of patients with no evidence of disease at the time of last follow-up was significantly higher in the study arm compared to the control arm [P < 0.05] and the proportion of patients with persistent disease was significantly less in the stuwdy arm compared to the control arm [P < 0.05]. The probability of disease-free survival in percentage according to the curve at the time of median follow-up was approximately 70% for study arm and 60% for control arm [log-rank test, P = 0.2463]. Conclusion: we should hence minimize treatment time and avoid any planned or unplanned interruptions or delays by timely integration of external beam and intra-cavitary irradiation that may yield a better local control in locally advanced cervical cancer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Metachronous Bilateral Breast Invasive Lobular Carcinoma with Metastasis to an Unusual Site Squamous Cell Carcinoma Arising from Perianal Fistula in HIV Positive Patient An Unusual Case of Painless Obstructive Jaundice and Cholangitis: Lemmel’s Syndrome- A Case Report Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Tumor Thrombus in the Inferior Vena Cava and Right Atrium Adding Low Dose Chemotherapy to Preoperative Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Retrospective Analysis of an Institutional Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1