大学评价体系中的使用价值与变化价值。两所机构的分析:古巴马坦萨斯大学和墨西哥CIUDAD juarez自治大学

Sofía Guadalupe Corral Soto
{"title":"大学评价体系中的使用价值与变化价值。两所机构的分析:古巴马坦萨斯大学和墨西哥CIUDAD juarez自治大学","authors":"Sofía Guadalupe Corral Soto","doi":"10.15366/jospoe2020.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyze the dynamics of evaluation of the academic and scientific production of the universities as an integral part of the social relations of production which are inherent in the capitalistic system. The role of researchers as knowledge workers is located, and scientific work, as an economic and political activity determined by social and historical interests. The objective of this article is the recognition of academic and scientific production as a source of value, and of the place that subjects occupy as producers of knowledge, within the capitalist scheme. For this, a methodology based on Marxist critical theory has been followed, in an exercise of transposition of the classic categories of use value and exchange value, applied to the university environment of knowledge production. The contributions of Ernest Mandel, Antonio Negri and Bolívar Echeverría are taken for a broaden understanding of the concept of Marxist value. As a result of this approach, two antagonistic models of knowledge assessment are identified; on one hand, a progressively restrictive and capitalizing logic of knowledge is observed, and on the other, a greater autonomy for subjects prevails against the lucrative imposition of capital.","PeriodicalId":431657,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Supranational Policies of Education","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"VALOR DE USO Y VALOR DE CAMBIO EN LOS SISTEMAS EVALUATIVOS UNIVERSITARIOS. ANÁLISIS DE DOS INSTITUCIONES: UNIVERSIDAD DE MATANZAS, CUBA Y UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE CIUDAD JUÁREZ, MÉXICO\",\"authors\":\"Sofía Guadalupe Corral Soto\",\"doi\":\"10.15366/jospoe2020.11.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyze the dynamics of evaluation of the academic and scientific production of the universities as an integral part of the social relations of production which are inherent in the capitalistic system. The role of researchers as knowledge workers is located, and scientific work, as an economic and political activity determined by social and historical interests. The objective of this article is the recognition of academic and scientific production as a source of value, and of the place that subjects occupy as producers of knowledge, within the capitalist scheme. For this, a methodology based on Marxist critical theory has been followed, in an exercise of transposition of the classic categories of use value and exchange value, applied to the university environment of knowledge production. The contributions of Ernest Mandel, Antonio Negri and Bolívar Echeverría are taken for a broaden understanding of the concept of Marxist value. As a result of this approach, two antagonistic models of knowledge assessment are identified; on one hand, a progressively restrictive and capitalizing logic of knowledge is observed, and on the other, a greater autonomy for subjects prevails against the lucrative imposition of capital.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Supranational Policies of Education\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Supranational Policies of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15366/jospoe2020.11.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Supranational Policies of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15366/jospoe2020.11.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了作为资本主义制度固有的社会生产关系组成部分的大学学术和科学生产评价的动态。研究人员作为知识工作者的角色被定位为,科学工作作为一种由社会和历史利益决定的经济和政治活动。本文的目的是承认学术和科学生产是价值的来源,以及主体在资本主义体系中作为知识生产者所占据的地位。为此,我们遵循了一种基于马克思主义批判理论的方法论,对使用价值和交换价值的经典范畴进行了转换,并将其应用于知识生产的大学环境。欧内斯特·曼德尔、安东尼奥·内格里和Bolívar Echeverría的贡献被认为是对马克思主义价值概念的拓宽理解。基于这种方法,我们确定了两种对立的知识评估模型;一方面,观察到知识的逐渐限制和资本化逻辑,另一方面,主体的更大自主权战胜了利润丰厚的资本强加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
VALOR DE USO Y VALOR DE CAMBIO EN LOS SISTEMAS EVALUATIVOS UNIVERSITARIOS. ANÁLISIS DE DOS INSTITUCIONES: UNIVERSIDAD DE MATANZAS, CUBA Y UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE CIUDAD JUÁREZ, MÉXICO
This article analyze the dynamics of evaluation of the academic and scientific production of the universities as an integral part of the social relations of production which are inherent in the capitalistic system. The role of researchers as knowledge workers is located, and scientific work, as an economic and political activity determined by social and historical interests. The objective of this article is the recognition of academic and scientific production as a source of value, and of the place that subjects occupy as producers of knowledge, within the capitalist scheme. For this, a methodology based on Marxist critical theory has been followed, in an exercise of transposition of the classic categories of use value and exchange value, applied to the university environment of knowledge production. The contributions of Ernest Mandel, Antonio Negri and Bolívar Echeverría are taken for a broaden understanding of the concept of Marxist value. As a result of this approach, two antagonistic models of knowledge assessment are identified; on one hand, a progressively restrictive and capitalizing logic of knowledge is observed, and on the other, a greater autonomy for subjects prevails against the lucrative imposition of capital.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SPANISH LEGISLATION AND IB PYP LANGUAGE POLICY DEVELOPMENT ENTREPRENEURSHIP COMPETENCE FOR SOCIETY AND SCHOOLS IN TIME OF CRISIS. A SYSTEMATIC BIBLIOGRAPHIC REVIEW IB DIPLOMA PROGRAMME CORE AS A SUPPLIER OF GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION CONVERGÊNCIAS E DIVERGÊNCIAS NA FORMAÇÃO INICIAL DO PROFESSOR NO BRASIL E PORTUGAL POLÍTICAS DE EVALUACIÓN ESTANDARIZADA Y GOBERNANZA “EMPRESARIAL” EN EDUCACIÓN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1