利用生理和行为指标对驾驶员睡意进行高精度预测的可能性探讨

A. Murata
{"title":"利用生理和行为指标对驾驶员睡意进行高精度预测的可能性探讨","authors":"A. Murata","doi":"10.54941/ahfe100155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of physiological and behavioral evaluation measures for predicting drivers’ subjective drowsiness. EEG, heart rate variability (RRV3), and blink frequency were physiological measures. Behavioral measures included neck vending angle (horizontal and vertical), back pressure, foot pressure, COP on sitting surface, frequency of body movement, tracking error in driving simulator task, and standard deviation of quantity of pedal operation. Drowsy states were predicted by using multinomial logistic regression model where physiological and behavioral measures and subjective evaluation of drowsiness corresponded to independent variables and a dependent variable, respectively. The prediction accuracy was obtained for a variety of combinations of the evaluation measures above. The maximum and minimum prediction accuracies were 0.962 and 0.876, respectively. Almost all combinations led to the prediction accuracy of more than 0.9. Moreover, it has been made clear that the proper interval used for attaining higher prediction accuracy is a 20-s interval between 20s and 40s before prediction.","PeriodicalId":259265,"journal":{"name":"AHFE International","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of Possibility of Driver’s Drowsiness Prediction with High Accuracy using Both Physiological and Behavioral Measures\",\"authors\":\"A. Murata\",\"doi\":\"10.54941/ahfe100155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of physiological and behavioral evaluation measures for predicting drivers’ subjective drowsiness. EEG, heart rate variability (RRV3), and blink frequency were physiological measures. Behavioral measures included neck vending angle (horizontal and vertical), back pressure, foot pressure, COP on sitting surface, frequency of body movement, tracking error in driving simulator task, and standard deviation of quantity of pedal operation. Drowsy states were predicted by using multinomial logistic regression model where physiological and behavioral measures and subjective evaluation of drowsiness corresponded to independent variables and a dependent variable, respectively. The prediction accuracy was obtained for a variety of combinations of the evaluation measures above. The maximum and minimum prediction accuracies were 0.962 and 0.876, respectively. Almost all combinations led to the prediction accuracy of more than 0.9. Moreover, it has been made clear that the proper interval used for attaining higher prediction accuracy is a 20-s interval between 20s and 40s before prediction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":259265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AHFE International\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AHFE International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe100155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AHFE International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe100155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在探讨驾驶人主观困倦的生理和行为评价方法的有效性。脑电图、心率变异性(RRV3)和眨眼频率是生理测量。行为学测量包括颈垂角(水平和垂直)、背压、足压、坐面COP、身体运动频率、驾驶模拟器任务跟踪误差、踏板操作次数标准差。困倦状态的预测采用多项逻辑回归模型,其中生理和行为测量以及困倦的主观评价分别对应于自变量和因变量。对上述评价指标的多种组合得到了预测精度。最大、最小预测精度分别为0.962和0.876。几乎所有组合的预测精度都在0.9以上。此外,还明确了预测前20s和40s之间的20-s间隔是获得较高预测精度的适当间隔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploration of Possibility of Driver’s Drowsiness Prediction with High Accuracy using Both Physiological and Behavioral Measures
The aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of physiological and behavioral evaluation measures for predicting drivers’ subjective drowsiness. EEG, heart rate variability (RRV3), and blink frequency were physiological measures. Behavioral measures included neck vending angle (horizontal and vertical), back pressure, foot pressure, COP on sitting surface, frequency of body movement, tracking error in driving simulator task, and standard deviation of quantity of pedal operation. Drowsy states were predicted by using multinomial logistic regression model where physiological and behavioral measures and subjective evaluation of drowsiness corresponded to independent variables and a dependent variable, respectively. The prediction accuracy was obtained for a variety of combinations of the evaluation measures above. The maximum and minimum prediction accuracies were 0.962 and 0.876, respectively. Almost all combinations led to the prediction accuracy of more than 0.9. Moreover, it has been made clear that the proper interval used for attaining higher prediction accuracy is a 20-s interval between 20s and 40s before prediction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Revitalizing The National Folk Play: The Tiger Hunting Folk Play Promoting Occupational Safety, Health, and Well-Being in SME Manufacturing Companies A Multi-Criteria and Multi-Actor Perspective for the Evaluation of Sustainability Services Open Innovation and Prospective Ergonomics for Smart Clothes Time Study and Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1