自然本质论与形式原因问题

José Tomás Alvarado, Matthew Tugby
{"title":"自然本质论与形式原因问题","authors":"José Tomás Alvarado, Matthew Tugby","doi":"10.4324/9780429329821-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A combination of formal causation and natural-kind essentialism has good prospects. After all, natural-kind \nessentialists are under pressure to accept that natural kinds ground or formally cause the properties that \ncharacterize them. However, natural-kind essentialists are committed to the claim that natural kinds essentially \ndepend on the properties that characterize them, such as the property of unit negative charge in the case of the electron kind. We argue that, given plausible assumptions about grounding and dependence, these claims clash. \nAfter presenting the problem, we consider and criticize ways in which natural-kind essentialists could try to avoid it.","PeriodicalId":117257,"journal":{"name":"Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Formal Causation","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Problem for Natural-Kind Essentialism and Formal Causes\",\"authors\":\"José Tomás Alvarado, Matthew Tugby\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780429329821-13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A combination of formal causation and natural-kind essentialism has good prospects. After all, natural-kind \\nessentialists are under pressure to accept that natural kinds ground or formally cause the properties that \\ncharacterize them. However, natural-kind essentialists are committed to the claim that natural kinds essentially \\ndepend on the properties that characterize them, such as the property of unit negative charge in the case of the electron kind. We argue that, given plausible assumptions about grounding and dependence, these claims clash. \\nAfter presenting the problem, we consider and criticize ways in which natural-kind essentialists could try to avoid it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Formal Causation\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Formal Causation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429329821-13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Formal Causation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429329821-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

形式因果论与自然本质论的结合具有良好的前景。毕竟,自然本质论家迫于压力,不得不承认,自然种类构成或正式导致了它们的特性。然而,自然类本质主义者坚持认为,自然类本质上取决于它们的特性,比如电子类的单位负电荷的特性。我们认为,鉴于有关基础和依赖的合理假设,这些主张是相互冲突的。在提出这个问题之后,我们考虑并批评自然本质主义者可能试图避免它的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Problem for Natural-Kind Essentialism and Formal Causes
A combination of formal causation and natural-kind essentialism has good prospects. After all, natural-kind essentialists are under pressure to accept that natural kinds ground or formally cause the properties that characterize them. However, natural-kind essentialists are committed to the claim that natural kinds essentially depend on the properties that characterize them, such as the property of unit negative charge in the case of the electron kind. We argue that, given plausible assumptions about grounding and dependence, these claims clash. After presenting the problem, we consider and criticize ways in which natural-kind essentialists could try to avoid it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Formal Causes for Powers Theorists Formal Causation Functional Powers A Problem for Natural-Kind Essentialism and Formal Causes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1