虚拟化技术的功耗:一个实证调查

Roberto Morabito
{"title":"虚拟化技术的功耗:一个实证调查","authors":"Roberto Morabito","doi":"10.1109/UCC.2015.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Virtualization is growing rapidly as a result of the increasing number of alternative solutions in this area, and of the wide range of application field. Until now, hypervisor-based virtualization has been the de facto solution to perform server virtualization. Recently, container-based virtualization -- an alternative to hypervisors -- has gained more attention because of lightweight characteristics, attracting cloud providers that have already made use of it to deliver their services. However, a gap in the existing research on containers exists in the area of power consumption. This paper presents the results of a performance comparison in terms of power consumption of four different virtualization technologies: KVM and Xen, which are based on hypervisor virtualization, Docker and LXC which are based on container virtualization. The aim of this empirical investigation, carried out by means of a testbed, is to understand how these technologies react to particular workloads. Our initial results show how, despite of the number of virtual entities running, both kinds of virtualization alternatives behave similarly in idle state and in CPU/Memory stress test. Contrarily, the results on network performance show differences between the two technologies.","PeriodicalId":381279,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"80","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power Consumption of Virtualization Technologies: An Empirical Investigation\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Morabito\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/UCC.2015.93\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Virtualization is growing rapidly as a result of the increasing number of alternative solutions in this area, and of the wide range of application field. Until now, hypervisor-based virtualization has been the de facto solution to perform server virtualization. Recently, container-based virtualization -- an alternative to hypervisors -- has gained more attention because of lightweight characteristics, attracting cloud providers that have already made use of it to deliver their services. However, a gap in the existing research on containers exists in the area of power consumption. This paper presents the results of a performance comparison in terms of power consumption of four different virtualization technologies: KVM and Xen, which are based on hypervisor virtualization, Docker and LXC which are based on container virtualization. The aim of this empirical investigation, carried out by means of a testbed, is to understand how these technologies react to particular workloads. Our initial results show how, despite of the number of virtual entities running, both kinds of virtualization alternatives behave similarly in idle state and in CPU/Memory stress test. Contrarily, the results on network performance show differences between the two technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":381279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC)\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"80\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/UCC.2015.93\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE/ACM 8th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UCC.2015.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 80

摘要

由于该领域的替代解决方案数量不断增加,以及应用领域的广泛,虚拟化正在迅速发展。到目前为止,基于管理程序的虚拟化一直是执行服务器虚拟化的实际解决方案。最近,基于容器的虚拟化(虚拟机管理程序的一种替代方案)由于其轻量级特性而获得了更多的关注,吸引了已经使用它来交付服务的云提供商。然而,现有的集装箱研究在能耗方面存在空白。本文介绍了四种不同虚拟化技术在功耗方面的性能比较结果:基于hypervisor虚拟化的KVM和Xen,基于容器虚拟化的Docker和LXC。这个实证研究的目的是通过一个试验台来执行,了解这些技术如何对特定的工作负载作出反应。我们的初步结果显示,尽管运行的虚拟实体数量不同,两种虚拟化替代方案在空闲状态和CPU/内存压力测试中的表现相似。相反,两种技术在网络性能上的结果存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Power Consumption of Virtualization Technologies: An Empirical Investigation
Virtualization is growing rapidly as a result of the increasing number of alternative solutions in this area, and of the wide range of application field. Until now, hypervisor-based virtualization has been the de facto solution to perform server virtualization. Recently, container-based virtualization -- an alternative to hypervisors -- has gained more attention because of lightweight characteristics, attracting cloud providers that have already made use of it to deliver their services. However, a gap in the existing research on containers exists in the area of power consumption. This paper presents the results of a performance comparison in terms of power consumption of four different virtualization technologies: KVM and Xen, which are based on hypervisor virtualization, Docker and LXC which are based on container virtualization. The aim of this empirical investigation, carried out by means of a testbed, is to understand how these technologies react to particular workloads. Our initial results show how, despite of the number of virtual entities running, both kinds of virtualization alternatives behave similarly in idle state and in CPU/Memory stress test. Contrarily, the results on network performance show differences between the two technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CYCLONE Unified Deployment and Management of Federated, Multi-cloud Applications Cloud Orchestration Features: Are Tools Fit for Purpose? Efficient Update of Encrypted Files for Cloud Storage Adaptive Performance Isolation Middleware for Multi-tenant SaaS Agent-Based Modelling as a Service on Amazon EC2: Opportunities and Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1