使用焦点+上下文技术进行文档探索的视觉质量指南

Qi Han, Dennis Thom, M. John, Steffen Koch, T. Ertl, Florian Heimerl
{"title":"使用焦点+上下文技术进行文档探索的视觉质量指南","authors":"Qi Han, Dennis Thom, M. John, Steffen Koch, T. Ertl, Florian Heimerl","doi":"10.1109/PacificVis.2019.00026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Magic lens based focus+context techniques are powerful means for exploring document spatializations. Typically, they only offer additional summarized or abstracted views on focused documents. As a consequence, users might miss important information that is either not shown in aggregated form or that never happens to get focused. In this work, we present the design process and user study results for improving a magic lens based document exploration approach with exemplary visual quality cues to guide users in steering the exploration and support them in interpreting the summarization results. We contribute a thorough analysis of potential sources of information loss involved in these techniques, which include the visual spatialization of text documents, user-steered exploration, and the visual summarization. With lessons learned from previous research, we highlight the various ways those information losses could hamper the exploration. Furthermore, we formally define measures for the aforementioned different types of information losses and bias. Finally, we present the visual cues to depict these quality measures that are seamlessly integrated into the exploration approach. These visual cues guide users during the exploration and reduce the risk of misinterpretation and accelerate insight generation. We conclude with the results of a controlled user study and discuss the benefits and challenges of integrating quality guidance in exploration techniques.","PeriodicalId":208856,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visual Quality Guidance for Document Exploration with Focus+Context Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Qi Han, Dennis Thom, M. John, Steffen Koch, T. Ertl, Florian Heimerl\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PacificVis.2019.00026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Magic lens based focus+context techniques are powerful means for exploring document spatializations. Typically, they only offer additional summarized or abstracted views on focused documents. As a consequence, users might miss important information that is either not shown in aggregated form or that never happens to get focused. In this work, we present the design process and user study results for improving a magic lens based document exploration approach with exemplary visual quality cues to guide users in steering the exploration and support them in interpreting the summarization results. We contribute a thorough analysis of potential sources of information loss involved in these techniques, which include the visual spatialization of text documents, user-steered exploration, and the visual summarization. With lessons learned from previous research, we highlight the various ways those information losses could hamper the exploration. Furthermore, we formally define measures for the aforementioned different types of information losses and bias. Finally, we present the visual cues to depict these quality measures that are seamlessly integrated into the exploration approach. These visual cues guide users during the exploration and reduce the risk of misinterpretation and accelerate insight generation. We conclude with the results of a controlled user study and discuss the benefits and challenges of integrating quality guidance in exploration techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":208856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PacificVis.2019.00026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PacificVis.2019.00026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于Magic lens的焦点+上下文技术是探索文档空间化的强大手段。通常,它们只提供对重点文档的附加摘要或抽象视图。因此,用户可能会错过重要的信息,这些信息要么没有以聚合形式显示,要么从来没有得到关注。在这项工作中,我们展示了设计过程和用户研究结果,以改进基于魔术透镜的文档探索方法,并提供示例性的视觉质量线索,以指导用户指导探索并支持他们解释总结结果。我们对这些技术中涉及的信息丢失的潜在来源进行了全面的分析,这些技术包括文本文档的视觉空间化、用户导向的探索和视觉摘要。从以前的研究中吸取教训,我们强调了这些信息丢失可能阻碍探索的各种方式。此外,我们正式定义了上述不同类型的信息损失和偏差的度量。最后,我们提供了视觉线索来描述这些无缝集成到勘探方法中的质量度量。这些视觉线索在探索过程中引导用户,减少误解的风险,加速洞察力的产生。我们总结了一项受控用户研究的结果,并讨论了在勘探技术中整合质量指导的好处和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Visual Quality Guidance for Document Exploration with Focus+Context Techniques
Magic lens based focus+context techniques are powerful means for exploring document spatializations. Typically, they only offer additional summarized or abstracted views on focused documents. As a consequence, users might miss important information that is either not shown in aggregated form or that never happens to get focused. In this work, we present the design process and user study results for improving a magic lens based document exploration approach with exemplary visual quality cues to guide users in steering the exploration and support them in interpreting the summarization results. We contribute a thorough analysis of potential sources of information loss involved in these techniques, which include the visual spatialization of text documents, user-steered exploration, and the visual summarization. With lessons learned from previous research, we highlight the various ways those information losses could hamper the exploration. Furthermore, we formally define measures for the aforementioned different types of information losses and bias. Finally, we present the visual cues to depict these quality measures that are seamlessly integrated into the exploration approach. These visual cues guide users during the exploration and reduce the risk of misinterpretation and accelerate insight generation. We conclude with the results of a controlled user study and discuss the benefits and challenges of integrating quality guidance in exploration techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visual Analysis of Ligand Trajectories in Molecular Dynamics Object-in-Hand Feature Displacement with Physically-Based Deformation Visual Exploration of Circulation Rolls in Convective Heat Flows Analysis of Coupled Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Simulations of a Generic Nuclear Waste Repository in Clay Rock Using Fiber Surfaces Space-Time Slicing: Visualizing Object Detector Performance in Driving Video Sequences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1