并行作业调度策略提高公平性:一个案例研究

V. Leung, Gerald Sabin, P. Sadayappan
{"title":"并行作业调度策略提高公平性:一个案例研究","authors":"V. Leung, Gerald Sabin, P. Sadayappan","doi":"10.1109/ICPPW.2010.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Balancing fairness, user performance, and system performance is a critical concern when developing and installing parallel schedulers. Sandia uses a customized scheduler to manage many of their parallel machines. A primary function of the scheduler is to ensure that the machines have good utilization and that users are treated in a ``fair'' manner. A separate compute process allocator (CPA) ensures that the jobs on the machines are not too fragmented in order to maximize throughput. Until recently, there has been no established technique to measure the fairness of parallel job schedulers. This paper introduces a ``hybrid'' fairness metric that is similar to recently proposed metrics. The metric uses the Sandia version of a ``fairshare'' queuing priority as the basis for fairness. The hybrid fairness metric is used to evaluate a Sandia workload. Using these results, multiple scheduling strategies are introduced to improve performance while satisfying user and system constraints.","PeriodicalId":415472,"journal":{"name":"2010 39th International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshops","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parallel Job Scheduling Policies to Improve Fairness: A Case Study\",\"authors\":\"V. Leung, Gerald Sabin, P. Sadayappan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPPW.2010.48\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Balancing fairness, user performance, and system performance is a critical concern when developing and installing parallel schedulers. Sandia uses a customized scheduler to manage many of their parallel machines. A primary function of the scheduler is to ensure that the machines have good utilization and that users are treated in a ``fair'' manner. A separate compute process allocator (CPA) ensures that the jobs on the machines are not too fragmented in order to maximize throughput. Until recently, there has been no established technique to measure the fairness of parallel job schedulers. This paper introduces a ``hybrid'' fairness metric that is similar to recently proposed metrics. The metric uses the Sandia version of a ``fairshare'' queuing priority as the basis for fairness. The hybrid fairness metric is used to evaluate a Sandia workload. Using these results, multiple scheduling strategies are introduced to improve performance while satisfying user and system constraints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":415472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 39th International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshops\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 39th International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPPW.2010.48\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 39th International Conference on Parallel Processing Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPPW.2010.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

在开发和安装并行调度器时,平衡公平性、用户性能和系统性能是一个关键问题。Sandia使用定制的调度器来管理许多并行机器。调度器的一个主要功能是确保机器具有良好的利用率,并以“公平”的方式对待用户。一个单独的计算进程分配器(CPA)确保机器上的作业不会过于分散,从而最大化吞吐量。直到最近,还没有确定的技术来衡量并行作业调度器的公平性。本文介绍了一种“混合”公平度量,它与最近提出的度量类似。该指标使用Sandia版本的“公平共享”排队优先级作为公平性的基础。混合公平性度量用于评估Sandia工作负载。利用这些结果,引入了多种调度策略来提高性能,同时满足用户和系统的约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Parallel Job Scheduling Policies to Improve Fairness: A Case Study
Balancing fairness, user performance, and system performance is a critical concern when developing and installing parallel schedulers. Sandia uses a customized scheduler to manage many of their parallel machines. A primary function of the scheduler is to ensure that the machines have good utilization and that users are treated in a ``fair'' manner. A separate compute process allocator (CPA) ensures that the jobs on the machines are not too fragmented in order to maximize throughput. Until recently, there has been no established technique to measure the fairness of parallel job schedulers. This paper introduces a ``hybrid'' fairness metric that is similar to recently proposed metrics. The metric uses the Sandia version of a ``fairshare'' queuing priority as the basis for fairness. The hybrid fairness metric is used to evaluate a Sandia workload. Using these results, multiple scheduling strategies are introduced to improve performance while satisfying user and system constraints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
GEM: Graphical Explorer of MPI Programs Predictive Space- and Time-Resource Allocation for Parallel Job Scheduling in Clusters, Grids, Clouds WS4D: Toolkits for Networked Embedded Systems Based on the Devices Profile for Web Services A Multi-hop Walkie-Talkie-Like Emergency Communication System for Catastrophic Natural Disasters Message Driven Programming with S-Net: Methodology and Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1