快还是慢?小型家族企业与非家族企业的决策风格

Duarte Pimentel, M. Scholten, J. Couto
{"title":"快还是慢?小型家族企业与非家族企业的决策风格","authors":"Duarte Pimentel, M. Scholten, J. Couto","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3136993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to explore differences in the decision making styles between family and nonfamily firms, while assessing how family participation relates to the use of decision making styles in family firms. The empirical evidence is provided by a sample of 155 firms, located in the Autonomous Region of the Azores, Portugal, 82 family-controlled and 73 nonfamily-controlled firms. Results suggest that there are no differences in the use of rational decision making between family and nonfamily firms. However, nonfamily firms show higher levels of experiential decision making than family firms. Results also show that family participation plays a key role in guiding the decisional process, by promoting the use experiential decisions and inhibiting the adoption of a rational decision making style in family firms. From an applied perspective, assessing the influence of family participation in the adoption of a decisional style is potentially valuable for practitioners as well as for owners and managers. Providing them with clues that may help them better understand the basis of their decisions which can benefit their relations with other family members, as with customers, partners and suppliers that play a key role in the firm’s growth, profitability and adaptability. This study responds to a gap in the literature, by exploring the use of experiential versus rational decision making styles in small family and nonfamily firms. This study also contributes to the understanding of the decision making within family firms, by assessing the role of family participation in the decisional process.","PeriodicalId":376768,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Psychology (Topic)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fast or Slow? Decision Making Styles in Small Family and Nonfamily Firms\",\"authors\":\"Duarte Pimentel, M. Scholten, J. Couto\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3136993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to explore differences in the decision making styles between family and nonfamily firms, while assessing how family participation relates to the use of decision making styles in family firms. The empirical evidence is provided by a sample of 155 firms, located in the Autonomous Region of the Azores, Portugal, 82 family-controlled and 73 nonfamily-controlled firms. Results suggest that there are no differences in the use of rational decision making between family and nonfamily firms. However, nonfamily firms show higher levels of experiential decision making than family firms. Results also show that family participation plays a key role in guiding the decisional process, by promoting the use experiential decisions and inhibiting the adoption of a rational decision making style in family firms. From an applied perspective, assessing the influence of family participation in the adoption of a decisional style is potentially valuable for practitioners as well as for owners and managers. Providing them with clues that may help them better understand the basis of their decisions which can benefit their relations with other family members, as with customers, partners and suppliers that play a key role in the firm’s growth, profitability and adaptability. This study responds to a gap in the literature, by exploring the use of experiential versus rational decision making styles in small family and nonfamily firms. This study also contributes to the understanding of the decision making within family firms, by assessing the role of family participation in the decisional process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CGN: Psychology (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CGN: Psychology (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3136993\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Psychology (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3136993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨家族企业与非家族企业决策风格的差异,同时评估家族参与与家族企业决策风格使用的关系。经验证据是由位于葡萄牙亚速尔群岛自治区的155家公司提供的,其中82家是家族控制的,73家是非家族控制的。结果表明,家族企业和非家族企业在理性决策的运用上没有差异。而非家族企业的经验决策水平高于家族企业。研究结果还表明,家族参与对家族企业的决策过程起着关键性的引导作用,促进了经验决策的使用,抑制了理性决策方式的采用。从应用的角度来看,评估家庭参与对采用决策风格的影响对从业者以及所有者和管理者都有潜在的价值。为他们提供线索,帮助他们更好地理解决策的基础,这有利于他们与其他家庭成员的关系,如与客户、合作伙伴和供应商的关系,这些关系在公司的增长、盈利能力和适应性中起着关键作用。本研究通过探索在小型家族企业和非家族企业中使用经验与理性决策风格来回应文献中的空白。本研究还通过评估家族参与决策过程的作用,有助于理解家族企业内部的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fast or Slow? Decision Making Styles in Small Family and Nonfamily Firms
The purpose of this study is to explore differences in the decision making styles between family and nonfamily firms, while assessing how family participation relates to the use of decision making styles in family firms. The empirical evidence is provided by a sample of 155 firms, located in the Autonomous Region of the Azores, Portugal, 82 family-controlled and 73 nonfamily-controlled firms. Results suggest that there are no differences in the use of rational decision making between family and nonfamily firms. However, nonfamily firms show higher levels of experiential decision making than family firms. Results also show that family participation plays a key role in guiding the decisional process, by promoting the use experiential decisions and inhibiting the adoption of a rational decision making style in family firms. From an applied perspective, assessing the influence of family participation in the adoption of a decisional style is potentially valuable for practitioners as well as for owners and managers. Providing them with clues that may help them better understand the basis of their decisions which can benefit their relations with other family members, as with customers, partners and suppliers that play a key role in the firm’s growth, profitability and adaptability. This study responds to a gap in the literature, by exploring the use of experiential versus rational decision making styles in small family and nonfamily firms. This study also contributes to the understanding of the decision making within family firms, by assessing the role of family participation in the decisional process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Managerial Overconfidence and Self-Reported Success How to Talk Down Your Stock Performance Director Overconfidence Mergers and the Market for Busy Directors: An International Analysis When Inequality is Good for Groups: The Moderating Role of Fairness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1