第16章通过线性混合效应模型评估相关因素作为工作与生活平衡可能的保护因素

Aimee K. Hubbard
{"title":"第16章通过线性混合效应模型评估相关因素作为工作与生活平衡可能的保护因素","authors":"Aimee K. Hubbard","doi":"10.1108/S1530-353520180000013018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThis study seeks to understand how work–life balance (WLB) changes over time, and if relational factors – relationship and sexual satisfaction – may have protective effects. Grounded in Bronfenbrenner’s (1986) family ecological theory a linear mixed effects analysis was used to analyze over 4,000 individual reports of WLB over three years. \n \nThe primary finding showed that on average, individuals rated their WLB just above average and their scores decrease over time. While relationship satisfaction did not have significant associations with WLB alone, the interaction between relationship and sexual satisfaction was found to be a protective factor, increasing WLB scores. This indicates that having higher sexual satisfaction can enhance the protective effect that relationship satisfaction has on WLB. \n \nAn intriguing finding was the significant difference in WLB scores for men compared to women. On average, men experience significantly lower WLB scores. This could be related to how WLB was measured, or possibly due to gender roles. Future research should further explore this relationship. \n \nThe results of this study provide information that researchers’ can consider as they design studies and interventions targeting WLB. An additional hope is that employers will consider these results when they create workplace policy and other initiatives. \n \nThis study is one of the first to explore WLB in association with relationship and sexual satisfaction and the interaction between sexual and relationship satisfaction. This chapter tests the interactions between mesosystems in a unique way that enhances researchers understanding of WLB.","PeriodicalId":217936,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapter 16 Evaluating Relational Factors as Possible Protective Factors for Work–Life Balance via a Linear Mixed Effects Model\",\"authors\":\"Aimee K. Hubbard\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/S1530-353520180000013018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nThis study seeks to understand how work–life balance (WLB) changes over time, and if relational factors – relationship and sexual satisfaction – may have protective effects. Grounded in Bronfenbrenner’s (1986) family ecological theory a linear mixed effects analysis was used to analyze over 4,000 individual reports of WLB over three years. \\n \\nThe primary finding showed that on average, individuals rated their WLB just above average and their scores decrease over time. While relationship satisfaction did not have significant associations with WLB alone, the interaction between relationship and sexual satisfaction was found to be a protective factor, increasing WLB scores. This indicates that having higher sexual satisfaction can enhance the protective effect that relationship satisfaction has on WLB. \\n \\nAn intriguing finding was the significant difference in WLB scores for men compared to women. On average, men experience significantly lower WLB scores. This could be related to how WLB was measured, or possibly due to gender roles. Future research should further explore this relationship. \\n \\nThe results of this study provide information that researchers’ can consider as they design studies and interventions targeting WLB. An additional hope is that employers will consider these results when they create workplace policy and other initiatives. \\n \\nThis study is one of the first to explore WLB in association with relationship and sexual satisfaction and the interaction between sexual and relationship satisfaction. This chapter tests the interactions between mesosystems in a unique way that enhances researchers understanding of WLB.\",\"PeriodicalId\":217936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1530-353520180000013018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1530-353520180000013018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在了解工作生活平衡(WLB)如何随时间变化,以及关系因素(关系和性满意度)是否可能具有保护作用。以Bronfenbrenner(1986)的家庭生态理论为基础,采用线性混合效应分析方法分析了三年来4000多份关于WLB的个体报告。研究的主要发现表明,平均而言,人们对自己体重的评价略高于平均水平,而且随着时间的推移,他们的得分会下降。虽然关系满意度单独与体重无关,但关系和性满意度之间的相互作用被发现是一个保护因素,增加了体重得分。这表明较高的性满意度可以增强关系满意度对体重的保护作用。一个有趣的发现是男性和女性在WLB得分上的显著差异。平均而言,男性的WLB得分明显较低。这可能与体重的测量方式有关,也可能与性别角色有关。未来的研究应进一步探讨这种关系。本研究的结果提供了研究人员在设计针对WLB的研究和干预措施时可以考虑的信息。另一个希望是,雇主在制定工作场所政策和其他举措时,会考虑到这些结果。本研究首次探讨体重与两性关系满意度和性满意度之间的关系,以及两性关系满意度和性满意度之间的相互作用。本章以一种独特的方式测试了中系统之间的相互作用,增强了研究人员对WLB的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chapter 16 Evaluating Relational Factors as Possible Protective Factors for Work–Life Balance via a Linear Mixed Effects Model
Abstract This study seeks to understand how work–life balance (WLB) changes over time, and if relational factors – relationship and sexual satisfaction – may have protective effects. Grounded in Bronfenbrenner’s (1986) family ecological theory a linear mixed effects analysis was used to analyze over 4,000 individual reports of WLB over three years. The primary finding showed that on average, individuals rated their WLB just above average and their scores decrease over time. While relationship satisfaction did not have significant associations with WLB alone, the interaction between relationship and sexual satisfaction was found to be a protective factor, increasing WLB scores. This indicates that having higher sexual satisfaction can enhance the protective effect that relationship satisfaction has on WLB. An intriguing finding was the significant difference in WLB scores for men compared to women. On average, men experience significantly lower WLB scores. This could be related to how WLB was measured, or possibly due to gender roles. Future research should further explore this relationship. The results of this study provide information that researchers’ can consider as they design studies and interventions targeting WLB. An additional hope is that employers will consider these results when they create workplace policy and other initiatives. This study is one of the first to explore WLB in association with relationship and sexual satisfaction and the interaction between sexual and relationship satisfaction. This chapter tests the interactions between mesosystems in a unique way that enhances researchers understanding of WLB.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Justice System and the Family: Police, Courts, and Incarceration Facing Death: Familial Responses to Illness and Death Families in Nigeria: Understanding Their Diversity, Adaptability, and Strengths Aging and the Family: Understanding Changes in Structural and Relationship Dynamics Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1