你的用户是在寻找还是在收集见解?:识别跨领域的洞察力驱动因素

M. Smuc, E. Mayr, Hanna Risku
{"title":"你的用户是在寻找还是在收集见解?:识别跨领域的洞察力驱动因素","authors":"M. Smuc, E. Mayr, Hanna Risku","doi":"10.1145/2110192.2110200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, using the number of insights to benchmark visual analytics tools has become a prominent method in the Infovis community. The insight methodology has become a frequently used instrument to measure the performance of tools that are developed for highly specialized purposes for highly specialized domain-experts. But some tools have a wider target group of experts with knowledge in different domains. The utility of the insight-method for other expert user groups without specific domain knowledge has been addressed to a far lesser extent. In a case study we give an illustration of how and where insights from experts with and without domain knowledge differ, and how these findings might enrich the evaluation of visualization tools designed for usage across different domains.","PeriodicalId":235801,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is your user hunting or gathering insights?: identifying insight drivers across domains\",\"authors\":\"M. Smuc, E. Mayr, Hanna Risku\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2110192.2110200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, using the number of insights to benchmark visual analytics tools has become a prominent method in the Infovis community. The insight methodology has become a frequently used instrument to measure the performance of tools that are developed for highly specialized purposes for highly specialized domain-experts. But some tools have a wider target group of experts with knowledge in different domains. The utility of the insight-method for other expert user groups without specific domain knowledge has been addressed to a far lesser extent. In a case study we give an illustration of how and where insights from experts with and without domain knowledge differ, and how these findings might enrich the evaluation of visualization tools designed for usage across different domains.\",\"PeriodicalId\":235801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2110192.2110200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2110192.2110200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

近年来,使用洞察的数量来对可视化分析工具进行基准测试已经成为Infovis社区中的一种重要方法。洞察方法已经成为一种经常使用的工具,用于度量为高度专门化的领域专家开发的高度专门化目的的工具的性能。但有些工具有更广泛的目标群体,即拥有不同领域知识的专家。对于没有特定领域知识的其他专家用户群体,洞察方法的效用已经在较小程度上得到了解决。在一个案例研究中,我们给出了一个例子,说明有和没有领域知识的专家的见解是如何和在哪里不同的,以及这些发现如何丰富为跨不同领域使用而设计的可视化工具的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is your user hunting or gathering insights?: identifying insight drivers across domains
In recent years, using the number of insights to benchmark visual analytics tools has become a prominent method in the Infovis community. The insight methodology has become a frequently used instrument to measure the performance of tools that are developed for highly specialized purposes for highly specialized domain-experts. But some tools have a wider target group of experts with knowledge in different domains. The utility of the insight-method for other expert user groups without specific domain knowledge has been addressed to a far lesser extent. In a case study we give an illustration of how and where insights from experts with and without domain knowledge differ, and how these findings might enrich the evaluation of visualization tools designed for usage across different domains.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lowering the Barrier for Successful Replication and Evaluation A Nested Workflow Model for Visual Analytics Design and Validation Cognitive Stages in Visual Data Exploration Evaluating Information Visualization on Mobile Devices: Gaps and Challenges in the Empirical Evaluation Design Space Action Design Research and Visualization Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1