探索性分析:从非结构化学术数据中提取材料科学知识

Xintong Zhao, Jane Greenberg, V. Meschke, E. Toberer, Xiaohua Hu
{"title":"探索性分析:从非结构化学术数据中提取材料科学知识","authors":"Xintong Zhao, Jane Greenberg, V. Meschke, E. Toberer, Xiaohua Hu","doi":"10.1108/el-11-2020-0320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe output of academic literature has increased significantly due to digital technology, presenting researchers with a challenge across every discipline, including materials science, as it is impossible to manually read and extract knowledge from millions of published literature. The purpose of this study is to address this challenge by exploring knowledge extraction in materials science, as applied to digital scholarship. An overriding goal is to help inform readers about the status knowledge extraction in materials science.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors conducted a two-part analysis, comparing knowledge extraction methods applied materials science scholarship, across a sample of 22 articles; followed by a comparison of HIVE-4-MAT, an ontology-based knowledge extraction and MatScholar, a named entity recognition (NER) application. This paper covers contextual background, and a review of three tiers of knowledge extraction (ontology-based, NER and relation extraction), followed by the research goals and approach.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results indicate three key needs for researchers to consider for advancing knowledge extraction: the need for materials science focused corpora; the need for researchers to define the scope of the research being pursued, and the need to understand the tradeoffs among different knowledge extraction methods. This paper also points to future material science research potential with relation extraction and increased availability of ontologies.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, there are very few studies examining knowledge extraction in materials science. This work makes an important contribution to this underexplored research area.\n","PeriodicalId":330882,"journal":{"name":"Electron. Libr.","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An exploratory analysis: extracting materials science knowledge from unstructured scholarly data\",\"authors\":\"Xintong Zhao, Jane Greenberg, V. Meschke, E. Toberer, Xiaohua Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/el-11-2020-0320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe output of academic literature has increased significantly due to digital technology, presenting researchers with a challenge across every discipline, including materials science, as it is impossible to manually read and extract knowledge from millions of published literature. The purpose of this study is to address this challenge by exploring knowledge extraction in materials science, as applied to digital scholarship. An overriding goal is to help inform readers about the status knowledge extraction in materials science.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe authors conducted a two-part analysis, comparing knowledge extraction methods applied materials science scholarship, across a sample of 22 articles; followed by a comparison of HIVE-4-MAT, an ontology-based knowledge extraction and MatScholar, a named entity recognition (NER) application. This paper covers contextual background, and a review of three tiers of knowledge extraction (ontology-based, NER and relation extraction), followed by the research goals and approach.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results indicate three key needs for researchers to consider for advancing knowledge extraction: the need for materials science focused corpora; the need for researchers to define the scope of the research being pursued, and the need to understand the tradeoffs among different knowledge extraction methods. This paper also points to future material science research potential with relation extraction and increased availability of ontologies.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, there are very few studies examining knowledge extraction in materials science. This work makes an important contribution to this underexplored research area.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":330882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electron. Libr.\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electron. Libr.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/el-11-2020-0320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electron. Libr.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/el-11-2020-0320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

由于数字技术的发展,学术文献的产出显著增加,这给包括材料科学在内的各个学科的研究人员带来了挑战,因为不可能手动阅读和提取数百万已发表的文献中的知识。本研究的目的是通过探索材料科学中的知识提取来解决这一挑战,并将其应用于数字学术。最重要的目标是帮助读者了解材料科学中的状态知识提取。设计/方法/方法作者对22篇文章的样本进行了两部分分析,比较了材料科学奖学金的知识提取方法;然后比较了基于本体的知识抽取方法HIVE-4-MAT和命名实体识别(NER)应用程序MatScholar。本文首先介绍了知识抽取的背景,然后介绍了知识抽取的三个层次(基于本体的、NER的和关系抽取的),然后介绍了研究目标和方法。研究结果表明,研究人员需要考虑推进知识提取的三个关键需求:需要以材料科学为重点的语料库;研究人员需要确定研究的范围,需要了解不同知识提取方法之间的权衡。本文还指出了随着关系提取和本体可用性的增加,未来材料科学研究的潜力。原创性/价值据作者所知,材料科学中知识提取的研究很少。这项工作为这一尚未充分开发的研究领域做出了重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An exploratory analysis: extracting materials science knowledge from unstructured scholarly data
Purpose The output of academic literature has increased significantly due to digital technology, presenting researchers with a challenge across every discipline, including materials science, as it is impossible to manually read and extract knowledge from millions of published literature. The purpose of this study is to address this challenge by exploring knowledge extraction in materials science, as applied to digital scholarship. An overriding goal is to help inform readers about the status knowledge extraction in materials science. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a two-part analysis, comparing knowledge extraction methods applied materials science scholarship, across a sample of 22 articles; followed by a comparison of HIVE-4-MAT, an ontology-based knowledge extraction and MatScholar, a named entity recognition (NER) application. This paper covers contextual background, and a review of three tiers of knowledge extraction (ontology-based, NER and relation extraction), followed by the research goals and approach. Findings The results indicate three key needs for researchers to consider for advancing knowledge extraction: the need for materials science focused corpora; the need for researchers to define the scope of the research being pursued, and the need to understand the tradeoffs among different knowledge extraction methods. This paper also points to future material science research potential with relation extraction and increased availability of ontologies. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there are very few studies examining knowledge extraction in materials science. This work makes an important contribution to this underexplored research area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Model for integration of information and communication technologies in resource sharing practices for enhanced service delivery in academic libraries in southeast Nigeria Constructing a spatiotemporal situational awareness framework to sense the dynamic evolution of online public opinion on social media An investigation of linked data catalogue features in libraries, archives, and museums: a checklist approach Virtual and augmented reality as predictors of users' intention to use Lagos State Public Library, Lagos State, Nigeria Advanced intelligent health advice with informative summaries to facilitate treatment decision-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1