就业法与知识产权法:试图解决趋同点上的问题

Ann Monotti
{"title":"就业法与知识产权法:试图解决趋同点上的问题","authors":"Ann Monotti","doi":"10.4337/9781785366420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter introduces a collection of published articles and book chapters from a range of jurisdictions in the area of employment law and intellectual property law. The chapter explains that the collection adopts a thematic approach through the lens of varied perspectives: contextual, historical and theoretical. The overall contextual perspective is that of intellectual property rights in both public (government and universities) and private sector employment. A separate section is dedicated to historical perspectives on ownership of employee inventions to reflect the extent of classic scholarship on this topic. However, historical perspectives also appear more broadly within each theme, especially where they present and analyse the legal, theoretical and practical issues that necessitated and catalysed change. Although there is extensive theoretical scholarship that examines justifications for each of the different forms of intellectual property, the research uncovered limited theoretical analysis of the legal principles that apply at the union of employment law and intellectual property law. Nevertheless, a collection of this kind is incomplete without some theoretical reflections. This collection is enriched by the contributions of both employment law and intellectual property law scholars. The authors’ principal discipline has a direct impact on the selection of issues, the point from which they commence their analysis, the perspective they take and the themes that interest them. In broad terms, an intellectual property scholar might frame the questions and conduct the analysis from the perspective of the creation of intellectual property rights during employment with particular attention to patents, confidential information and to duties of employment. What balance of rights between employer and employee will most effectively and efficiently create incentives for production of knowledge that has the relevant attributes for protection? An employment law scholar, on the other hand, might frame the questions from the perspective of safeguarding the employee’s ability to continue to use her skills and knowledge after leaving employment to work elsewhere. Their focus may not be on the creation of intellectual property rights during employment but on the evaluation of restraints that an employer might impose under contract law on departing employees. Employment law scholars in particular might question the extent to which contractual restraints undermine the balance that intellectual property laws seek to maintain between monopolised information and the public domain. They may be concerned to constrain the parameters of what knowledge might have protection as a trade secret and support the imposition of restraints on a departing employee. This chapter considers the points of convergence and the attempts to resolve the issues that arise at those points. The chapter takes the reader on a personal voyage of discovery across the literature and hopefully entices scholars in each field to delve further into each theme, reflect on their own understanding of the connections between employment law and intellectual property law and add to the existing body of scholarship.","PeriodicalId":357008,"journal":{"name":"Employment Law eJournal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employment Law and Intellectual Property Law: Attempts to Resolve Issues at the Points of Convergence\",\"authors\":\"Ann Monotti\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781785366420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter introduces a collection of published articles and book chapters from a range of jurisdictions in the area of employment law and intellectual property law. The chapter explains that the collection adopts a thematic approach through the lens of varied perspectives: contextual, historical and theoretical. The overall contextual perspective is that of intellectual property rights in both public (government and universities) and private sector employment. A separate section is dedicated to historical perspectives on ownership of employee inventions to reflect the extent of classic scholarship on this topic. However, historical perspectives also appear more broadly within each theme, especially where they present and analyse the legal, theoretical and practical issues that necessitated and catalysed change. Although there is extensive theoretical scholarship that examines justifications for each of the different forms of intellectual property, the research uncovered limited theoretical analysis of the legal principles that apply at the union of employment law and intellectual property law. Nevertheless, a collection of this kind is incomplete without some theoretical reflections. This collection is enriched by the contributions of both employment law and intellectual property law scholars. The authors’ principal discipline has a direct impact on the selection of issues, the point from which they commence their analysis, the perspective they take and the themes that interest them. In broad terms, an intellectual property scholar might frame the questions and conduct the analysis from the perspective of the creation of intellectual property rights during employment with particular attention to patents, confidential information and to duties of employment. What balance of rights between employer and employee will most effectively and efficiently create incentives for production of knowledge that has the relevant attributes for protection? An employment law scholar, on the other hand, might frame the questions from the perspective of safeguarding the employee’s ability to continue to use her skills and knowledge after leaving employment to work elsewhere. Their focus may not be on the creation of intellectual property rights during employment but on the evaluation of restraints that an employer might impose under contract law on departing employees. Employment law scholars in particular might question the extent to which contractual restraints undermine the balance that intellectual property laws seek to maintain between monopolised information and the public domain. They may be concerned to constrain the parameters of what knowledge might have protection as a trade secret and support the imposition of restraints on a departing employee. This chapter considers the points of convergence and the attempts to resolve the issues that arise at those points. The chapter takes the reader on a personal voyage of discovery across the literature and hopefully entices scholars in each field to delve further into each theme, reflect on their own understanding of the connections between employment law and intellectual property law and add to the existing body of scholarship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":357008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Employment Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Employment Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785366420\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employment Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785366420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章介绍了一系列在就业法和知识产权法领域的司法管辖区发表的文章和书籍章节的集合。本章解释了该系列通过不同视角的镜头采用主题方法:语境,历史和理论。总体背景观点是公共(政府和大学)和私营部门就业中的知识产权问题。一个单独的部分致力于对员工发明所有权的历史观点,以反映在这个主题上的经典奖学金的程度。然而,历史观点也在每个主题中更广泛地出现,特别是在它们提出和分析需要和催化变革的法律、理论和实践问题的地方。尽管有广泛的理论研究考察了每一种不同形式的知识产权的正当性,但研究发现,对适用于就业法和知识产权法的法律原则的理论分析有限。然而,没有一些理论反思,这样的集合是不完整的。就业法和知识产权法学者的贡献丰富了这本文集。作者的主要学科对问题的选择、他们开始分析的观点、他们采取的观点和他们感兴趣的主题有直接的影响。从广义上讲,知识产权学者可以从雇佣期间知识产权创造的角度来构建问题并进行分析,特别关注专利、保密信息和雇佣义务。雇主和雇员之间怎样的权利平衡才能最有效地为知识的生产创造激励,而知识的生产具有相关的保护属性?另一方面,就业法学者可能会从保护雇员在离职后继续使用其技能和知识的能力的角度来提出问题。它们的重点可能不是在雇佣期间创造知识产权,而是评估雇主根据合同法可能对离职雇员施加的限制。尤其是就业法学者可能会质疑,合同限制在多大程度上破坏了知识产权法试图在垄断信息和公共领域之间维持的平衡。他们可能会考虑限制哪些知识可以作为商业秘密受到保护的参数,并支持对离职员工施加限制。这一章考虑了汇合点和解决这些汇合点上出现的问题的尝试。本章将带领读者进行一次跨越文献的个人探索之旅,并希望吸引各个领域的学者进一步深入研究每个主题,反思他们自己对就业法和知识产权法之间联系的理解,并为现有的学术机构增添新的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Employment Law and Intellectual Property Law: Attempts to Resolve Issues at the Points of Convergence
This chapter introduces a collection of published articles and book chapters from a range of jurisdictions in the area of employment law and intellectual property law. The chapter explains that the collection adopts a thematic approach through the lens of varied perspectives: contextual, historical and theoretical. The overall contextual perspective is that of intellectual property rights in both public (government and universities) and private sector employment. A separate section is dedicated to historical perspectives on ownership of employee inventions to reflect the extent of classic scholarship on this topic. However, historical perspectives also appear more broadly within each theme, especially where they present and analyse the legal, theoretical and practical issues that necessitated and catalysed change. Although there is extensive theoretical scholarship that examines justifications for each of the different forms of intellectual property, the research uncovered limited theoretical analysis of the legal principles that apply at the union of employment law and intellectual property law. Nevertheless, a collection of this kind is incomplete without some theoretical reflections. This collection is enriched by the contributions of both employment law and intellectual property law scholars. The authors’ principal discipline has a direct impact on the selection of issues, the point from which they commence their analysis, the perspective they take and the themes that interest them. In broad terms, an intellectual property scholar might frame the questions and conduct the analysis from the perspective of the creation of intellectual property rights during employment with particular attention to patents, confidential information and to duties of employment. What balance of rights between employer and employee will most effectively and efficiently create incentives for production of knowledge that has the relevant attributes for protection? An employment law scholar, on the other hand, might frame the questions from the perspective of safeguarding the employee’s ability to continue to use her skills and knowledge after leaving employment to work elsewhere. Their focus may not be on the creation of intellectual property rights during employment but on the evaluation of restraints that an employer might impose under contract law on departing employees. Employment law scholars in particular might question the extent to which contractual restraints undermine the balance that intellectual property laws seek to maintain between monopolised information and the public domain. They may be concerned to constrain the parameters of what knowledge might have protection as a trade secret and support the imposition of restraints on a departing employee. This chapter considers the points of convergence and the attempts to resolve the issues that arise at those points. The chapter takes the reader on a personal voyage of discovery across the literature and hopefully entices scholars in each field to delve further into each theme, reflect on their own understanding of the connections between employment law and intellectual property law and add to the existing body of scholarship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work from/for Home: Recommendations to Ease Post-Pandemic Multiple Burden on Women Teleworking in the Aftermath of the Covid-19 Pandemic: Enabling Conditions for a Successful Transition A Summary of the Statistical Aspects of the Procedures for Resolving Potential Employment Discrimination Recently Issued by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Along with a Commentary Creative Labour in the Era of Covid-19: The Case of Freelancers Non-Competes and Other Contracts of Dispossession
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1