俄国进军西伯利亚的历史:以第一次阿穆尔河远征为中心

Joonil Moon
{"title":"俄国进军西伯利亚的历史:以第一次阿穆尔河远征为中心","authors":"Joonil Moon","doi":"10.19170/eebs.2023.47.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After Ermak left the Siberian expedition in the 16th century, Russia had already reached the Sea of Okhotsk in the first half of the 17th century. In the process, an expedition led by V. Poyarkov and E. Khabarov surveyed vast territories in the Priamourie region and began subjugating the territory. This expansion of Russia caused a conflict with China, which was on the way to advance, and as a result, the border line was cleared by signing the Treaty of Nerchinsk with China in 1689. In the process, Russia lost sovereignty over the Amur River basin. Afterwards, the most important issue of Russian international politics in the Far East was the recovery of the Amur coastal region lost after the Treaty of Nerchinsk. The Russian government tried several times after 1689 to establish more precise borders with China, but the threat of cessation of trade with China made things difficult. The Amur River is the only passage from Siberia to the Pacific Ocean. However, in order to be able to connect the Siberian inland with the Pacific Ocean, ships must be able to operate in the Amur River estuary. This is because it must be able to navigate through the mouth of the Amur River in the Pacific Ocean to have a function as a transportation route. Prior to the 19th century exploration of Nevelskoy, several expeditions had concluded that the mouth of the Amur River was navigable and that Sakhalin was a peninsula. However, questioning this, the young officer Nebelskoy proceeds with an independent exploration without government permission and eventually makes a discovery that overturns his previous conclusions. This paper examines the process and contents of Nevelskoy’s Amur exploration, which has a very important meaning in Russia's advance into Siberia, and tries to derive its meaning.","PeriodicalId":142621,"journal":{"name":"East European and Balkan Institute","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"History of Russia’s Advance into Siberia: Focusing on the 1st Amur Expedition\",\"authors\":\"Joonil Moon\",\"doi\":\"10.19170/eebs.2023.47.2.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After Ermak left the Siberian expedition in the 16th century, Russia had already reached the Sea of Okhotsk in the first half of the 17th century. In the process, an expedition led by V. Poyarkov and E. Khabarov surveyed vast territories in the Priamourie region and began subjugating the territory. This expansion of Russia caused a conflict with China, which was on the way to advance, and as a result, the border line was cleared by signing the Treaty of Nerchinsk with China in 1689. In the process, Russia lost sovereignty over the Amur River basin. Afterwards, the most important issue of Russian international politics in the Far East was the recovery of the Amur coastal region lost after the Treaty of Nerchinsk. The Russian government tried several times after 1689 to establish more precise borders with China, but the threat of cessation of trade with China made things difficult. The Amur River is the only passage from Siberia to the Pacific Ocean. However, in order to be able to connect the Siberian inland with the Pacific Ocean, ships must be able to operate in the Amur River estuary. This is because it must be able to navigate through the mouth of the Amur River in the Pacific Ocean to have a function as a transportation route. Prior to the 19th century exploration of Nevelskoy, several expeditions had concluded that the mouth of the Amur River was navigable and that Sakhalin was a peninsula. However, questioning this, the young officer Nebelskoy proceeds with an independent exploration without government permission and eventually makes a discovery that overturns his previous conclusions. This paper examines the process and contents of Nevelskoy’s Amur exploration, which has a very important meaning in Russia's advance into Siberia, and tries to derive its meaning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East European and Balkan Institute\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East European and Balkan Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19170/eebs.2023.47.2.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European and Balkan Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19170/eebs.2023.47.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

埃尔马克在16世纪离开西伯利亚远征队后,俄罗斯在17世纪上半叶已经到达鄂霍次克海。在此过程中,v·波雅科夫和e·哈巴罗夫领导的探险队调查了普利亚莫里地区的大片领土,并开始征服这片领土。俄罗斯的扩张引起了与正在前进的中国的冲突,结果,1689年与中国签订了《尼布钦斯克条约》,从而清除了边界线。在此过程中,俄罗斯失去了对阿穆尔河流域的主权。此后,俄罗斯在远东国际政治中最重要的问题是收复《尼布钦斯克条约》后失去的阿穆尔河沿岸地区。1689年后,俄罗斯政府多次试图与中国建立更精确的边界,但停止与中国贸易的威胁使事情变得困难。阿穆尔河是从西伯利亚到太平洋的唯一通道。然而,为了能够将西伯利亚内陆与太平洋连接起来,船只必须能够在阿穆尔河河口作业。这是因为它必须能够通过太平洋的阿穆尔河入海口,才能发挥运输路线的作用。在19世纪的涅维尔斯科伊探险之前,几支探险队已经得出结论,阿穆尔河的入海口是可以通航的,库页岛是一个半岛。然而,年轻的军官涅别尔斯科伊对此表示怀疑,他在没有政府许可的情况下进行了独立的探索,最终发现了一个推翻他之前结论的发现。涅维尔斯基的阿穆尔河勘探对俄罗斯进军西伯利亚具有十分重要的意义,本文对其过程和内容进行了考察,并试图推导其意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
History of Russia’s Advance into Siberia: Focusing on the 1st Amur Expedition
After Ermak left the Siberian expedition in the 16th century, Russia had already reached the Sea of Okhotsk in the first half of the 17th century. In the process, an expedition led by V. Poyarkov and E. Khabarov surveyed vast territories in the Priamourie region and began subjugating the territory. This expansion of Russia caused a conflict with China, which was on the way to advance, and as a result, the border line was cleared by signing the Treaty of Nerchinsk with China in 1689. In the process, Russia lost sovereignty over the Amur River basin. Afterwards, the most important issue of Russian international politics in the Far East was the recovery of the Amur coastal region lost after the Treaty of Nerchinsk. The Russian government tried several times after 1689 to establish more precise borders with China, but the threat of cessation of trade with China made things difficult. The Amur River is the only passage from Siberia to the Pacific Ocean. However, in order to be able to connect the Siberian inland with the Pacific Ocean, ships must be able to operate in the Amur River estuary. This is because it must be able to navigate through the mouth of the Amur River in the Pacific Ocean to have a function as a transportation route. Prior to the 19th century exploration of Nevelskoy, several expeditions had concluded that the mouth of the Amur River was navigable and that Sakhalin was a peninsula. However, questioning this, the young officer Nebelskoy proceeds with an independent exploration without government permission and eventually makes a discovery that overturns his previous conclusions. This paper examines the process and contents of Nevelskoy’s Amur exploration, which has a very important meaning in Russia's advance into Siberia, and tries to derive its meaning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study of Key Trends in Russian Cinema for 2022~2023 The Dynamic Cohesion Of Idea And Aesthetics: Multi­layered Narrative Of Tolstoy’s Resurrection The Impact of the Russia-Ukraine War on Ukrainian Education and Future Challenges Comparative Analysis of Black and White’s Color Meaning Symbol: Analysis of Korean-Hungarian Folksong’s Text Ustaše Ethnolinguistic-Racical Ideology in ‘Croatian Purism’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1