石油储量估算经典体积法的数学修正

{"title":"石油储量估算经典体积法的数学修正","authors":"","doi":"10.23880/ppej-16000324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using fuzzy logic technique, this work proposes a mathematical adjustment to the classical volumetric method for estimating oil reserves to manage the level of uncertainty associated with oil reserves estimation. This technique introduces a risk factor (α) into the volumetric method equation to account for the uncertainty associated with estimating the parameters that are used in the volumetric method equation. Risk types that may affect oil reserves estimation can be considered using the risk factor (α) in the modified equation. Results showed that the amount of proven oil reserves decreases exponentially as the value of risk factor (α) increases. It also showed that the ratio of the expected proven oil reserves with respect to proven oil reserves (N*/N) goes to zero when the value of risk factor (α) reaches a value of (5). Three cases were proposed to categorize uncertainty in proven oil reserves estimation: high risk estimate, middle risk estimate and risk-free estimate. Results showed that, for the case of high-risk estimate, expected proven oil reserves (N*) was appreciably lower than the proven oil reserves (N) due to the inclusion of risk. Sources of risk may include, but not limited to, lack of expertise of the evaluator, level of integrity of the evaluator, engineering errors during measurement and calculation and governmental laws. Results also showed that the calculated amount of proven oil reserves (N*), for the middle risk estimate case, is much higher than that for high risk estimate case. As for the riskfree estimate case, the calculated proven oil reserves (N*) using the modified formula equals to the proven oil reserves (N) calculated by the classical volumetric formula. This case reflects 100% confidence and reliability in the parameters’ estimation which also places great trust in the evaluator’s integrity and expertise.","PeriodicalId":282073,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mathematical Modification to the Classical Volumetric Method for Estimating Oil Reserves\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.23880/ppej-16000324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using fuzzy logic technique, this work proposes a mathematical adjustment to the classical volumetric method for estimating oil reserves to manage the level of uncertainty associated with oil reserves estimation. This technique introduces a risk factor (α) into the volumetric method equation to account for the uncertainty associated with estimating the parameters that are used in the volumetric method equation. Risk types that may affect oil reserves estimation can be considered using the risk factor (α) in the modified equation. Results showed that the amount of proven oil reserves decreases exponentially as the value of risk factor (α) increases. It also showed that the ratio of the expected proven oil reserves with respect to proven oil reserves (N*/N) goes to zero when the value of risk factor (α) reaches a value of (5). Three cases were proposed to categorize uncertainty in proven oil reserves estimation: high risk estimate, middle risk estimate and risk-free estimate. Results showed that, for the case of high-risk estimate, expected proven oil reserves (N*) was appreciably lower than the proven oil reserves (N) due to the inclusion of risk. Sources of risk may include, but not limited to, lack of expertise of the evaluator, level of integrity of the evaluator, engineering errors during measurement and calculation and governmental laws. Results also showed that the calculated amount of proven oil reserves (N*), for the middle risk estimate case, is much higher than that for high risk estimate case. As for the riskfree estimate case, the calculated proven oil reserves (N*) using the modified formula equals to the proven oil reserves (N) calculated by the classical volumetric formula. This case reflects 100% confidence and reliability in the parameters’ estimation which also places great trust in the evaluator’s integrity and expertise.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23880/ppej-16000324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/ppej-16000324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用模糊逻辑技术,本文提出了一种数学上的调整,用于估计石油储量的经典体积方法,以管理与石油储量估计相关的不确定性水平。该技术在容积法方程中引入了一个风险因子(α),以解释与估算容积法方程中使用的参数相关的不确定性。可以用修正方程中的风险因子(α)来考虑可能影响石油储量估算的风险类型。结果表明,随着风险因子(α)值的增大,探明储量呈指数递减。当风险因子(α)值达到(5)时,期望探明储量与探明储量之比(N*/N)趋于零。将探明储量估算中的不确定性划分为三种情况:高风险估算、中等风险估算和无风险估算。结果表明,在高风险估计的情况下,由于纳入了风险,预期探明储量(N*)明显低于实际探明储量(N)。风险的来源可能包括,但不限于,评估人员缺乏专业知识,评估人员的诚信水平,测量和计算过程中的工程错误以及政府法律。结果还表明,中等风险估计情况下计算的探明石油储量(N*)远高于高风险估计情况。在无风险估计情况下,修正公式计算出的探明石油储量N*等于经典体积公式计算出的探明石油储量N。本案例反映了对参数估计的100%置信度和可靠性,也对评估者的诚信和专业知识给予了极大的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mathematical Modification to the Classical Volumetric Method for Estimating Oil Reserves
Using fuzzy logic technique, this work proposes a mathematical adjustment to the classical volumetric method for estimating oil reserves to manage the level of uncertainty associated with oil reserves estimation. This technique introduces a risk factor (α) into the volumetric method equation to account for the uncertainty associated with estimating the parameters that are used in the volumetric method equation. Risk types that may affect oil reserves estimation can be considered using the risk factor (α) in the modified equation. Results showed that the amount of proven oil reserves decreases exponentially as the value of risk factor (α) increases. It also showed that the ratio of the expected proven oil reserves with respect to proven oil reserves (N*/N) goes to zero when the value of risk factor (α) reaches a value of (5). Three cases were proposed to categorize uncertainty in proven oil reserves estimation: high risk estimate, middle risk estimate and risk-free estimate. Results showed that, for the case of high-risk estimate, expected proven oil reserves (N*) was appreciably lower than the proven oil reserves (N) due to the inclusion of risk. Sources of risk may include, but not limited to, lack of expertise of the evaluator, level of integrity of the evaluator, engineering errors during measurement and calculation and governmental laws. Results also showed that the calculated amount of proven oil reserves (N*), for the middle risk estimate case, is much higher than that for high risk estimate case. As for the riskfree estimate case, the calculated proven oil reserves (N*) using the modified formula equals to the proven oil reserves (N) calculated by the classical volumetric formula. This case reflects 100% confidence and reliability in the parameters’ estimation which also places great trust in the evaluator’s integrity and expertise.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Absorption of Crude Oil from Water Surface Using Shells of Periwinkle, Thales (Ngolo) and Oyster Exploitation and Development of Oil/Gas Marginal Fields in Nigeria and Romania: Technology, Rising Market Development Challenges & Sustainable Energy Transition Development of a New Correlation for Predicting Initial Water Saturation in Carbonate Reservoirs Review of the Technical and Economic Evaluation of the Use of Means of Simultaneous Independent Operation for Solving Technical Problems Advancing Reservoir Performance Optimization through UserFriendly Excel VBA Software Development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1