绿化国家

J. Meadowcroft
{"title":"绿化国家","authors":"J. Meadowcroft","doi":"10.1177/1743453X0600200203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Robyn Eckersley’s The Green State makes a notable contribution to green political theory as well as to more general debates about the evolution of the modern state, the future of democratic governance, and changing patterns of international interaction. The book’s argument is complex and multilayered, offering a normative vision of a ‘green state’ that has moved beyond existing democratic practices to embody the values of ‘ecological democracy’. Such a ‘transnational green democratic state’ is seen as constituting a critical link in a system of global ecological governance. The first part of Eckersley’s work explores three challenges to the project of greening the state. First, there is the ‘anarchic character’ of the existing state system, where insecurity and competition for resources drive states to engage in environmentally destructive behaviour. Second, there is ‘capitalist accumulation’ which leads states to endorse environmentally perverse growth-oriented policies. And third, there are the ‘democratic deficits’ of the liberal democratic state, particularly the ascendance of instrumental rationality and those liberal ‘dogmas’ that impede the protection of environmental goods. In each case Eckersley argues that it is possible to overcome these difficulties, and to transform existing realities. The normative theory of the green state is presented in more detail in the second half of the book, with an examination of the nature of ‘ecological democracy’, the role of civil society and the green public sphere, the evolution of transnational democracy, and the greening of sovereignty. Although the argument draws on many theoretical literatures – including work from international relations, liberal and neo-Marxist political theory, and environmental politics – the writings of Habermas play a particularly pivotal role. Central to Eckersley’s perspective is what she describes as the ‘ambit claim’ of ecological democracy – that all those affected by decisions about environmental risk (including people outside the territory over which the state holds","PeriodicalId":381236,"journal":{"name":"Politics and Ethics Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Greening the State\",\"authors\":\"J. Meadowcroft\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1743453X0600200203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Robyn Eckersley’s The Green State makes a notable contribution to green political theory as well as to more general debates about the evolution of the modern state, the future of democratic governance, and changing patterns of international interaction. The book’s argument is complex and multilayered, offering a normative vision of a ‘green state’ that has moved beyond existing democratic practices to embody the values of ‘ecological democracy’. Such a ‘transnational green democratic state’ is seen as constituting a critical link in a system of global ecological governance. The first part of Eckersley’s work explores three challenges to the project of greening the state. First, there is the ‘anarchic character’ of the existing state system, where insecurity and competition for resources drive states to engage in environmentally destructive behaviour. Second, there is ‘capitalist accumulation’ which leads states to endorse environmentally perverse growth-oriented policies. And third, there are the ‘democratic deficits’ of the liberal democratic state, particularly the ascendance of instrumental rationality and those liberal ‘dogmas’ that impede the protection of environmental goods. In each case Eckersley argues that it is possible to overcome these difficulties, and to transform existing realities. The normative theory of the green state is presented in more detail in the second half of the book, with an examination of the nature of ‘ecological democracy’, the role of civil society and the green public sphere, the evolution of transnational democracy, and the greening of sovereignty. Although the argument draws on many theoretical literatures – including work from international relations, liberal and neo-Marxist political theory, and environmental politics – the writings of Habermas play a particularly pivotal role. Central to Eckersley’s perspective is what she describes as the ‘ambit claim’ of ecological democracy – that all those affected by decisions about environmental risk (including people outside the territory over which the state holds\",\"PeriodicalId\":381236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politics and Ethics Review\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politics and Ethics Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1743453X0600200203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics and Ethics Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1743453X0600200203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

Robyn Eckersley的《绿色国家》对绿色政治理论做出了显著的贡献,也对现代国家的演变、民主治理的未来以及不断变化的国际互动模式进行了更广泛的讨论。这本书的论点是复杂和多层次的,提供了一个规范的“绿色国家”的愿景,超越了现有的民主实践,体现了“生态民主”的价值观。这种“跨国绿色民主国家”被视为构成全球生态治理体系的关键环节。埃克斯利作品的第一部分探讨了绿化国家项目面临的三个挑战。首先,现有国家体系具有“无政府性质”,不安全感和对资源的竞争驱使国家从事破坏环境的行为。其次,“资本主义积累”导致国家支持不利于环境的增长导向政策。第三,自由民主国家的“民主赤字”,特别是工具理性的优势和那些阻碍保护环境产品的自由主义“教条”。埃克斯利认为,在每一种情况下,都有可能克服这些困难,改变现有的现实。绿色国家的规范理论在书的后半部分更详细地介绍,并考察了“生态民主”的本质、公民社会和绿色公共领域的作用、跨国民主的演变以及主权的绿化。尽管这一论点借鉴了许多理论文献——包括来自国际关系、自由主义和新马克思主义政治理论以及环境政治的著作——但哈贝马斯的著作发挥了特别关键的作用。埃克斯利观点的核心是她所描述的生态民主的“边界主张”——所有受环境风险决策影响的人(包括国家管辖范围以外的人)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Greening the State
Robyn Eckersley’s The Green State makes a notable contribution to green political theory as well as to more general debates about the evolution of the modern state, the future of democratic governance, and changing patterns of international interaction. The book’s argument is complex and multilayered, offering a normative vision of a ‘green state’ that has moved beyond existing democratic practices to embody the values of ‘ecological democracy’. Such a ‘transnational green democratic state’ is seen as constituting a critical link in a system of global ecological governance. The first part of Eckersley’s work explores three challenges to the project of greening the state. First, there is the ‘anarchic character’ of the existing state system, where insecurity and competition for resources drive states to engage in environmentally destructive behaviour. Second, there is ‘capitalist accumulation’ which leads states to endorse environmentally perverse growth-oriented policies. And third, there are the ‘democratic deficits’ of the liberal democratic state, particularly the ascendance of instrumental rationality and those liberal ‘dogmas’ that impede the protection of environmental goods. In each case Eckersley argues that it is possible to overcome these difficulties, and to transform existing realities. The normative theory of the green state is presented in more detail in the second half of the book, with an examination of the nature of ‘ecological democracy’, the role of civil society and the green public sphere, the evolution of transnational democracy, and the greening of sovereignty. Although the argument draws on many theoretical literatures – including work from international relations, liberal and neo-Marxist political theory, and environmental politics – the writings of Habermas play a particularly pivotal role. Central to Eckersley’s perspective is what she describes as the ‘ambit claim’ of ecological democracy – that all those affected by decisions about environmental risk (including people outside the territory over which the state holds
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Genetic Profiling: Ethical Constraints upon Criminal Investigation Procedures Considering Reasonableness The Ideological Roots of Right-Wing Ethnoregionalism and the Civic Republican Critique Notes on Contributors Moral Actors and Political Spectators: On Some Virtues and Vices of Rawls's Liberalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1