{"title":"目的比较数字平板x线摄影检波器","authors":"V. Ostojic, Djordje Starcevic, V. Petrovic","doi":"10.1109/INDEL.2016.7797796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital flat-panel radiography detectors have become a standard part of modern digital radiography systems. Performance of a detector can be evaluated through three major indicators: noise, contrast and spatial resolution. Signal-to-noise ratio was employed to evaluate noise presence, contrast-to-noise ratio was utilized for contrast characteristic estimate while modulation transfer function and visual inspection of resolution phantom image were used for spatial resolution evaluation. In this paper, we present an extensive comparison of eight different flat-panel detectors using aforementioned evaluation methods. Comparison results are presented both numerically and graphically.","PeriodicalId":273613,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (INDEL)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Objective comparison of digital flat-panel radiography detectors\",\"authors\":\"V. Ostojic, Djordje Starcevic, V. Petrovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INDEL.2016.7797796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digital flat-panel radiography detectors have become a standard part of modern digital radiography systems. Performance of a detector can be evaluated through three major indicators: noise, contrast and spatial resolution. Signal-to-noise ratio was employed to evaluate noise presence, contrast-to-noise ratio was utilized for contrast characteristic estimate while modulation transfer function and visual inspection of resolution phantom image were used for spatial resolution evaluation. In this paper, we present an extensive comparison of eight different flat-panel detectors using aforementioned evaluation methods. Comparison results are presented both numerically and graphically.\",\"PeriodicalId\":273613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (INDEL)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (INDEL)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDEL.2016.7797796\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (INDEL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDEL.2016.7797796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective comparison of digital flat-panel radiography detectors
Digital flat-panel radiography detectors have become a standard part of modern digital radiography systems. Performance of a detector can be evaluated through three major indicators: noise, contrast and spatial resolution. Signal-to-noise ratio was employed to evaluate noise presence, contrast-to-noise ratio was utilized for contrast characteristic estimate while modulation transfer function and visual inspection of resolution phantom image were used for spatial resolution evaluation. In this paper, we present an extensive comparison of eight different flat-panel detectors using aforementioned evaluation methods. Comparison results are presented both numerically and graphically.