机构投资者监督动机与CEO薪酬

Cai Liu, Chao Yin
{"title":"机构投资者监督动机与CEO薪酬","authors":"Cai Liu, Chao Yin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3726115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines whether the motivation of institutional investors in monitoring a firm can influence CEO compensation. We find that greater motivated monitoring institutional ownership is associated with a higher pay-performance sensitivity of CEO compensation, which cannot be explained by traditional measures of institutional ownership. Further, we find that the economic effect of institutional monitoring on the pay-performance sensitivity falls with decreasing institutions’ monitoring motivation. Finally, we document that CEO pay– performance sensitivity is more, if not only, related to the unsystematic component of corporate performance in firms with greater motivated monitoring IO. These results suggest that how well the institutions can serve their monitoring role and mitigate the agency problem between shareholders and managers depends on the proportion of ownership held by motivated monitoring institutions.","PeriodicalId":378721,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Other Comparative Capitalism (Topic)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional Investor Monitoring Motivation and CEO Compensation\",\"authors\":\"Cai Liu, Chao Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3726115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines whether the motivation of institutional investors in monitoring a firm can influence CEO compensation. We find that greater motivated monitoring institutional ownership is associated with a higher pay-performance sensitivity of CEO compensation, which cannot be explained by traditional measures of institutional ownership. Further, we find that the economic effect of institutional monitoring on the pay-performance sensitivity falls with decreasing institutions’ monitoring motivation. Finally, we document that CEO pay– performance sensitivity is more, if not only, related to the unsystematic component of corporate performance in firms with greater motivated monitoring IO. These results suggest that how well the institutions can serve their monitoring role and mitigate the agency problem between shareholders and managers depends on the proportion of ownership held by motivated monitoring institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Other Comparative Capitalism (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Other Comparative Capitalism (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3726115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Other Comparative Capitalism (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3726115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了机构投资者监督公司的动机是否会影响CEO薪酬。我们发现,更大的激励监督机构所有权与CEO薪酬更高的薪酬绩效敏感性相关,这无法用传统的机构所有权指标来解释。此外,我们发现机构监督对薪酬绩效敏感性的经济效应随着机构监督动机的降低而下降。最后,我们证明,在具有更强激励监控的公司中,CEO薪酬-绩效敏感性与公司绩效的非系统性成分关系更大(如果不是唯一的话)。这些结果表明,机构能否很好地发挥监督作用,缓解股东和管理者之间的代理问题,取决于有动机的监督机构所持有的股权比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Institutional Investor Monitoring Motivation and CEO Compensation
This paper examines whether the motivation of institutional investors in monitoring a firm can influence CEO compensation. We find that greater motivated monitoring institutional ownership is associated with a higher pay-performance sensitivity of CEO compensation, which cannot be explained by traditional measures of institutional ownership. Further, we find that the economic effect of institutional monitoring on the pay-performance sensitivity falls with decreasing institutions’ monitoring motivation. Finally, we document that CEO pay– performance sensitivity is more, if not only, related to the unsystematic component of corporate performance in firms with greater motivated monitoring IO. These results suggest that how well the institutions can serve their monitoring role and mitigate the agency problem between shareholders and managers depends on the proportion of ownership held by motivated monitoring institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Income and Consumption over the Business Cycle: Evidence from Matched Administrative Data Unemployment Hysteresis in Asian Countries: Findings Based on Flexible Fourier Form and Structural Break Unit Root Tests How Americans Respond to Idiosyncratic and Exogenous Changes in Household Wealth and Unearned Income Do Mutual Funds Represent Individual Investors? Global or Country Business Cycles: Developed versus Developing Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1