网络环境下的网络实验室:成功的指标。

Hilmi A. Lahoud, Jack P. Krichen
{"title":"网络环境下的网络实验室:成功的指标。","authors":"Hilmi A. Lahoud, Jack P. Krichen","doi":"10.21061/jots.v36i2.a.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several techniques have been used to provide hands-on educational experiences to online learners, including remote labs, simulation software, and virtual labs, which offer a more structured environment, including simulations and scheduled asynchronous access to physical resources. This exploratory study investigated how these methods can be used from the learner's perspective to enhance the online learning experience by improving its effectiveness and maintaining students’ satisfaction while keeping the same level of standards and outcomes as face-to-face courses. Current and former online learners from several community and four-year colleges were surveyed to evaluate their experiences for utilizing different networking lab techniques. An analysis of survey results highlights the importance of lab accessibility to learner satisfaction and evaluates the interaction between learner experience and preference for networking labs. These results are used to recommend the best implementation practices and to guide future studies in online networking labs. Introduction Hands-on experience with network equipment is an essential aspect of learning computer networks, and historically it has been the mode of preparing professionals for careers in this field. It reinforces the conceptual framework of this discipline and provides the real-world experience demanded by employers in these professions (Nurul, 2006). The evolution of online learning and economic constraints have prompted the development of remote computer network laboratories and network simulation programs that closely mimic the operation of corporate computer networks (Lawson & Stackpole, 2006; Wong, Wolf, Gorinsky, & Turner, 2007) . To effectively prepare learners to transfer their learning in these environments to the enterprise, it is essential to compare the traditional network learning environment and the remote and virtual “simulated” environments. In particular, the impact of using an online learning context in conjunction with these lab scenarios must be explored because of the expanding number of online networking programs. Research exists that explores these relationships from the learner outcome perspective, but does not clearly indicate what aspects of the lab environments or learner characteristics might be related to these outcomes (Lawson & Stackpole, 2006). Because the online educational context can provide a flexible environment to accommodate individual learning characteristics, discovering these characteristics and the affect they have on learning will enable the development and maturation of more effective network labs. Background From the early days of distance learning, commonly referred to as Distance Education, and current online educational environments (elearning), teaching technical courses remotely has been a challenge. Educational institutions tried different aspects of teaching remote courses using hybrid methods, including video demonstrations, offline network laboratories, and other activities utilizing both synchronous and asynchronous teaching techniques within the same course while attempting to include experiential-based learning activities. Although the importance of providing experimentally based, hands-on learning in the online environment was acknowledged, providing this experience complicated technical support, and often required that learners purchase course-related equipment to perform the activities to master network competencies (Lahoud & Tang, 2006). Therefore, it has been challenging to offer networking courses online because of the need for hands-on experience and the high cost of networking equipment, particularly if it could not be shared (Ma & Nickerson, 2006). Technological advances during the last several years have supported the development of high-quality network simulations (Boson, 2008) and the sharing of expensive network equipment through Internet-based remote labs (Network Development Group, 2009). Remote labs became more popular because of the power of personal computers and the speed of the Internet (Border, 2007; Rigby & Dark, 2006; Schumann, 2003). According to Corter, Nickerson, Esche, Chassapis, Im, & Ma (2007), remote labs proved to be an effective tool in providing hands-on laboratory experiences to students. Networking Labs in the Online Environment: Indicators for Success Hilmi A. Lahoud and Jack P. Krichen","PeriodicalId":142452,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Technology Studies","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Networking Labs in the Online Environment: Indicators for Success.\",\"authors\":\"Hilmi A. Lahoud, Jack P. Krichen\",\"doi\":\"10.21061/jots.v36i2.a.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Several techniques have been used to provide hands-on educational experiences to online learners, including remote labs, simulation software, and virtual labs, which offer a more structured environment, including simulations and scheduled asynchronous access to physical resources. This exploratory study investigated how these methods can be used from the learner's perspective to enhance the online learning experience by improving its effectiveness and maintaining students’ satisfaction while keeping the same level of standards and outcomes as face-to-face courses. Current and former online learners from several community and four-year colleges were surveyed to evaluate their experiences for utilizing different networking lab techniques. An analysis of survey results highlights the importance of lab accessibility to learner satisfaction and evaluates the interaction between learner experience and preference for networking labs. These results are used to recommend the best implementation practices and to guide future studies in online networking labs. Introduction Hands-on experience with network equipment is an essential aspect of learning computer networks, and historically it has been the mode of preparing professionals for careers in this field. It reinforces the conceptual framework of this discipline and provides the real-world experience demanded by employers in these professions (Nurul, 2006). The evolution of online learning and economic constraints have prompted the development of remote computer network laboratories and network simulation programs that closely mimic the operation of corporate computer networks (Lawson & Stackpole, 2006; Wong, Wolf, Gorinsky, & Turner, 2007) . To effectively prepare learners to transfer their learning in these environments to the enterprise, it is essential to compare the traditional network learning environment and the remote and virtual “simulated” environments. In particular, the impact of using an online learning context in conjunction with these lab scenarios must be explored because of the expanding number of online networking programs. Research exists that explores these relationships from the learner outcome perspective, but does not clearly indicate what aspects of the lab environments or learner characteristics might be related to these outcomes (Lawson & Stackpole, 2006). Because the online educational context can provide a flexible environment to accommodate individual learning characteristics, discovering these characteristics and the affect they have on learning will enable the development and maturation of more effective network labs. Background From the early days of distance learning, commonly referred to as Distance Education, and current online educational environments (elearning), teaching technical courses remotely has been a challenge. Educational institutions tried different aspects of teaching remote courses using hybrid methods, including video demonstrations, offline network laboratories, and other activities utilizing both synchronous and asynchronous teaching techniques within the same course while attempting to include experiential-based learning activities. Although the importance of providing experimentally based, hands-on learning in the online environment was acknowledged, providing this experience complicated technical support, and often required that learners purchase course-related equipment to perform the activities to master network competencies (Lahoud & Tang, 2006). Therefore, it has been challenging to offer networking courses online because of the need for hands-on experience and the high cost of networking equipment, particularly if it could not be shared (Ma & Nickerson, 2006). Technological advances during the last several years have supported the development of high-quality network simulations (Boson, 2008) and the sharing of expensive network equipment through Internet-based remote labs (Network Development Group, 2009). Remote labs became more popular because of the power of personal computers and the speed of the Internet (Border, 2007; Rigby & Dark, 2006; Schumann, 2003). According to Corter, Nickerson, Esche, Chassapis, Im, & Ma (2007), remote labs proved to be an effective tool in providing hands-on laboratory experiences to students. Networking Labs in the Online Environment: Indicators for Success Hilmi A. Lahoud and Jack P. Krichen\",\"PeriodicalId\":142452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Technology Studies\",\"volume\":\"121 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Technology Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v36i2.a.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Technology Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v36i2.a.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

已经使用了几种技术来为在线学习者提供实践教育体验,包括远程实验室、仿真软件和虚拟实验室,它们提供了更结构化的环境,包括模拟和对物理资源的调度异步访问。本探索性研究探讨了如何从学习者的角度使用这些方法,通过提高在线学习的有效性和保持学生的满意度来增强在线学习体验,同时保持与面对面课程相同的标准和结果。来自几个社区和四年制大学的现在和以前的在线学习者接受了调查,以评估他们使用不同网络实验室技术的经验。对调查结果的分析强调了实验室可达性对学习者满意度的重要性,并评估了学习者体验与网络实验室偏好之间的相互作用。这些结果用于推荐最佳实现实践,并指导在线网络实验室的未来研究。网络设备的实践经验是学习计算机网络的一个重要方面,从历史上看,它一直是为该领域的职业生涯做好准备的专业人员的模式。它强化了这门学科的概念框架,并提供了这些职业的雇主所需要的真实世界的经验(Nurul, 2006)。在线学习的发展和经济约束促使远程计算机网络实验室和网络模拟程序的发展,这些程序密切模仿企业计算机网络的运行(Lawson & Stackpole, 2006;Wong, Wolf, Gorinsky, & Turner, 2007)。为了使学习者有效地准备将他们在这些环境中的学习转移到企业中,有必要对传统的网络学习环境与远程和虚拟的“模拟”环境进行比较。特别是,由于在线网络项目的数量不断增加,必须探索将在线学习环境与这些实验室场景结合使用的影响。已有研究从学习者结果的角度探讨了这些关系,但并没有明确指出实验室环境或学习者特征的哪些方面可能与这些结果相关(Lawson & Stackpole, 2006)。由于在线教育环境可以提供一个灵活的环境来适应个人的学习特点,发现这些特点及其对学习的影响将使更有效的网络实验室的发展和成熟。从早期的远程学习(通常被称为远程教育)到现在的在线教育环境(电子学习),远程教授技术课程一直是一个挑战。教育机构尝试了使用混合方法教授远程课程的不同方面,包括视频演示、离线网络实验室,以及在同一课程中利用同步和异步教学技术的其他活动,同时试图包括基于体验的学习活动。虽然在网络环境中提供基于实验的实践学习的重要性得到了承认,但提供这种体验需要复杂的技术支持,并且通常要求学习者购买与课程相关的设备来执行活动以掌握网络能力(Lahoud & Tang, 2006)。因此,由于需要实践经验和网络设备的高成本,特别是如果它不能共享,因此在线提供网络课程一直具有挑战性(Ma & Nickerson, 2006)。过去几年的技术进步支持了高质量网络模拟的发展(Boson, 2008)和通过基于互联网的远程实验室共享昂贵的网络设备(网络开发小组,2009)。由于个人电脑的能力和互联网的速度,远程实验室变得更受欢迎(Border, 2007;Rigby & Dark, 2006;舒曼,2003)。根据Corter、Nickerson、Esche、Chassapis、Im和Ma(2007)的研究,远程实验室被证明是为学生提供动手实验体验的有效工具。网络环境下的网络实验室:成功的指标
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Networking Labs in the Online Environment: Indicators for Success.
Several techniques have been used to provide hands-on educational experiences to online learners, including remote labs, simulation software, and virtual labs, which offer a more structured environment, including simulations and scheduled asynchronous access to physical resources. This exploratory study investigated how these methods can be used from the learner's perspective to enhance the online learning experience by improving its effectiveness and maintaining students’ satisfaction while keeping the same level of standards and outcomes as face-to-face courses. Current and former online learners from several community and four-year colleges were surveyed to evaluate their experiences for utilizing different networking lab techniques. An analysis of survey results highlights the importance of lab accessibility to learner satisfaction and evaluates the interaction between learner experience and preference for networking labs. These results are used to recommend the best implementation practices and to guide future studies in online networking labs. Introduction Hands-on experience with network equipment is an essential aspect of learning computer networks, and historically it has been the mode of preparing professionals for careers in this field. It reinforces the conceptual framework of this discipline and provides the real-world experience demanded by employers in these professions (Nurul, 2006). The evolution of online learning and economic constraints have prompted the development of remote computer network laboratories and network simulation programs that closely mimic the operation of corporate computer networks (Lawson & Stackpole, 2006; Wong, Wolf, Gorinsky, & Turner, 2007) . To effectively prepare learners to transfer their learning in these environments to the enterprise, it is essential to compare the traditional network learning environment and the remote and virtual “simulated” environments. In particular, the impact of using an online learning context in conjunction with these lab scenarios must be explored because of the expanding number of online networking programs. Research exists that explores these relationships from the learner outcome perspective, but does not clearly indicate what aspects of the lab environments or learner characteristics might be related to these outcomes (Lawson & Stackpole, 2006). Because the online educational context can provide a flexible environment to accommodate individual learning characteristics, discovering these characteristics and the affect they have on learning will enable the development and maturation of more effective network labs. Background From the early days of distance learning, commonly referred to as Distance Education, and current online educational environments (elearning), teaching technical courses remotely has been a challenge. Educational institutions tried different aspects of teaching remote courses using hybrid methods, including video demonstrations, offline network laboratories, and other activities utilizing both synchronous and asynchronous teaching techniques within the same course while attempting to include experiential-based learning activities. Although the importance of providing experimentally based, hands-on learning in the online environment was acknowledged, providing this experience complicated technical support, and often required that learners purchase course-related equipment to perform the activities to master network competencies (Lahoud & Tang, 2006). Therefore, it has been challenging to offer networking courses online because of the need for hands-on experience and the high cost of networking equipment, particularly if it could not be shared (Ma & Nickerson, 2006). Technological advances during the last several years have supported the development of high-quality network simulations (Boson, 2008) and the sharing of expensive network equipment through Internet-based remote labs (Network Development Group, 2009). Remote labs became more popular because of the power of personal computers and the speed of the Internet (Border, 2007; Rigby & Dark, 2006; Schumann, 2003). According to Corter, Nickerson, Esche, Chassapis, Im, & Ma (2007), remote labs proved to be an effective tool in providing hands-on laboratory experiences to students. Networking Labs in the Online Environment: Indicators for Success Hilmi A. Lahoud and Jack P. Krichen
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Technology Education in New Zealand Comparing Functions, Costs, and Rewards of Quality Engineers and Six Sigma Black Belts Immediate impact of dynamic graphics instruction on learners of varied levels of spatial ability Effects of Mobile Phones on Students’ Academic Performance in Religious Education Teacher Shortage and Alternative Licensure Solutions for Technical Educators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1